When the eyes have it and when not: How multiple sources of activation combine to guide eye movements during multi-attribute decision- making.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Universität Zürich (UZH)
  • University of Bremen
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1394-1418
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume151
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Memory plays a major but underexplored role in judgment and decision making (JDM). Studying eye movements—especially how people look at empty spatial locations when retrieving from memory information previously associated with those locations—provides useful information about how memory influences JDM. This so-called looking-at-nothing behavior is thought to reflect memory-driven allocation of attention. However, eye movements are also guided toward salient visual stimuli, such as test items presented on a screen. It is unclear how these multiple sources of activation combine to guide looking-at-nothing in JDM. We investigated this question in two experiments in which participants solved multiattribute categorization tasks using an exemplar-based decision strategy. In the first experiment, we tested how the occurrence and the strength of looking-at-nothing vary with the presentation format and the amount of training participants received. Looking-at-nothing occurred during categorizations when test-item information was presented auditorily and visually, but for the latter only after visual information was removed from the screen. It occurred both when training items were learned by heart and when they were presented 10 times on the screen. A second experiment revealed that an explicit instruction to imagine retrieval-relevant information during categorizations increased looking-at-nothing but did not change the decision-making process. The results shed light on the interaction between eye movements and attention to information in memory during JDM that can be explained in light of a shared priority map in memory. A detailed understanding of this interaction forms the basis for using eye movements to study memory processes in JDM.

Keywords

    Attention, Decision making, Eye movements, Memory, Similarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

When the eyes have it and when not: How multiple sources of activation combine to guide eye movements during multi-attribute decision- making. / Rosner, Agnes; Schaffner, Michael; von Helversen, Bettina.
In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 151, No. 6, 2021, p. 1394-1418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{eaf04d4bb71542d08e9b29d363f6392a,
title = "When the eyes have it and when not: How multiple sources of activation combine to guide eye movements during multi-attribute decision- making.",
abstract = "Memory plays a major but underexplored role in judgment and decision making (JDM). Studying eye movements—especially how people look at empty spatial locations when retrieving from memory information previously associated with those locations—provides useful information about how memory influences JDM. This so-called looking-at-nothing behavior is thought to reflect memory-driven allocation of attention. However, eye movements are also guided toward salient visual stimuli, such as test items presented on a screen. It is unclear how these multiple sources of activation combine to guide looking-at-nothing in JDM. We investigated this question in two experiments in which participants solved multiattribute categorization tasks using an exemplar-based decision strategy. In the first experiment, we tested how the occurrence and the strength of looking-at-nothing vary with the presentation format and the amount of training participants received. Looking-at-nothing occurred during categorizations when test-item information was presented auditorily and visually, but for the latter only after visual information was removed from the screen. It occurred both when training items were learned by heart and when they were presented 10 times on the screen. A second experiment revealed that an explicit instruction to imagine retrieval-relevant information during categorizations increased looking-at-nothing but did not change the decision-making process. The results shed light on the interaction between eye movements and attention to information in memory during JDM that can be explained in light of a shared priority map in memory. A detailed understanding of this interaction forms the basis for using eye movements to study memory processes in JDM.",
keywords = "Attention, Decision making, Eye movements, Memory, Similarity",
author = "Agnes Rosner and Michael Schaffner and {von Helversen}, Bettina",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021. American Psychological Association",
year = "2021",
doi = "doi.org/10.1037/xge0000833",
language = "English",
volume = "151",
pages = "1394--1418",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the eyes have it and when not: How multiple sources of activation combine to guide eye movements during multi-attribute decision- making.

AU - Rosner, Agnes

AU - Schaffner, Michael

AU - von Helversen, Bettina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021. American Psychological Association

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Memory plays a major but underexplored role in judgment and decision making (JDM). Studying eye movements—especially how people look at empty spatial locations when retrieving from memory information previously associated with those locations—provides useful information about how memory influences JDM. This so-called looking-at-nothing behavior is thought to reflect memory-driven allocation of attention. However, eye movements are also guided toward salient visual stimuli, such as test items presented on a screen. It is unclear how these multiple sources of activation combine to guide looking-at-nothing in JDM. We investigated this question in two experiments in which participants solved multiattribute categorization tasks using an exemplar-based decision strategy. In the first experiment, we tested how the occurrence and the strength of looking-at-nothing vary with the presentation format and the amount of training participants received. Looking-at-nothing occurred during categorizations when test-item information was presented auditorily and visually, but for the latter only after visual information was removed from the screen. It occurred both when training items were learned by heart and when they were presented 10 times on the screen. A second experiment revealed that an explicit instruction to imagine retrieval-relevant information during categorizations increased looking-at-nothing but did not change the decision-making process. The results shed light on the interaction between eye movements and attention to information in memory during JDM that can be explained in light of a shared priority map in memory. A detailed understanding of this interaction forms the basis for using eye movements to study memory processes in JDM.

AB - Memory plays a major but underexplored role in judgment and decision making (JDM). Studying eye movements—especially how people look at empty spatial locations when retrieving from memory information previously associated with those locations—provides useful information about how memory influences JDM. This so-called looking-at-nothing behavior is thought to reflect memory-driven allocation of attention. However, eye movements are also guided toward salient visual stimuli, such as test items presented on a screen. It is unclear how these multiple sources of activation combine to guide looking-at-nothing in JDM. We investigated this question in two experiments in which participants solved multiattribute categorization tasks using an exemplar-based decision strategy. In the first experiment, we tested how the occurrence and the strength of looking-at-nothing vary with the presentation format and the amount of training participants received. Looking-at-nothing occurred during categorizations when test-item information was presented auditorily and visually, but for the latter only after visual information was removed from the screen. It occurred both when training items were learned by heart and when they were presented 10 times on the screen. A second experiment revealed that an explicit instruction to imagine retrieval-relevant information during categorizations increased looking-at-nothing but did not change the decision-making process. The results shed light on the interaction between eye movements and attention to information in memory during JDM that can be explained in light of a shared priority map in memory. A detailed understanding of this interaction forms the basis for using eye movements to study memory processes in JDM.

KW - Attention

KW - Decision making

KW - Eye movements

KW - Memory

KW - Similarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119272155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - doi.org/10.1037/xge0000833

DO - doi.org/10.1037/xge0000833

M3 - Article

VL - 151

SP - 1394

EP - 1418

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 6

ER -

By the same author(s)