Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1185–1206 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 6-7 |
Early online date | 9 May 2023 |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2023 |
Abstract
In this work, the systematic validation of a deterministic finite element (FE) model updating procedure for damage assessment is presented using a self-developed modular laboratory experiment. A fundamental, systematic validation of damage assessment methods is rarely conducted and in many experimental investigations, only one type of defect is introduced at only one position. Often, the damage inserted is irreversible and inspections are only performed visually. Thus, the damage introduced and, with it, the results of the damage assessment method considered are often not entirely analyzed in terms of quantity and quality. To address this shortcoming, a modular steel cantilever beam is designed with nine reversible damage positions and the option to insert different damage scenarios in a controlled manner. The measurement data are made available in open-access form which enables a systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods. To demonstrate such a systematic validation using the modular laboratory experiment, a deterministic FE model updating procedure previously introduced by the authors is applied and extended. The FE model updating approach uses different parameterized damage distribution functions to update the stiffness properties of the structure considered. The mathematical formulation allows for an updating procedure that is independent of the FE mesh resolution and free of assumptions about the defect location while only needing few design variables. In this work, the FE model updating procedure is based only on eigenfrequency deviations. The results show a precise localization within ±0.05m of the nine different damage positions and a correct relative quantification of the three different damage scenarios considered. With that, first, it is shown that the deterministic FE model updating procedure presented is suitable for precise damage assessment. Second, this work demonstrates that the opportunity to introduce several reversible damage positions and distinctly defined types and severities of damage into the laboratory experiment presented generally enables the systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods.
Keywords
- Damage assessment, Experimental validation, FE model updating, Modal analysis, Numerical optimization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Engineering(all)
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 13, No. 6-7, 10.2023, p. 1185–1206.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of an FE model updating procedure for damage assessment using a modular laboratory experiment with a reversible damage mechanism
AU - Wolniak, Marlene
AU - Hofmeister, Benedikt
AU - Jonscher, Clemens
AU - Fankhänel, Matthias
AU - Loose, Ansgar
AU - Hübler, Clemens
AU - Rolfes, Raimund
N1 - Funding Information: We greatly acknowledge the financial support of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (research project Multivariates Schadensmonitoring von Rotorblättern, FKZ 0324157A) and Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (research project Gebrauchstauglichkeit und Komfort von dynamisch beanspruchten Holztragwerken im urbanen mehrgeschossigen Hochbau, AZ 34548/01-25) that enabled this work. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - SFB-1463-434502799.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - In this work, the systematic validation of a deterministic finite element (FE) model updating procedure for damage assessment is presented using a self-developed modular laboratory experiment. A fundamental, systematic validation of damage assessment methods is rarely conducted and in many experimental investigations, only one type of defect is introduced at only one position. Often, the damage inserted is irreversible and inspections are only performed visually. Thus, the damage introduced and, with it, the results of the damage assessment method considered are often not entirely analyzed in terms of quantity and quality. To address this shortcoming, a modular steel cantilever beam is designed with nine reversible damage positions and the option to insert different damage scenarios in a controlled manner. The measurement data are made available in open-access form which enables a systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods. To demonstrate such a systematic validation using the modular laboratory experiment, a deterministic FE model updating procedure previously introduced by the authors is applied and extended. The FE model updating approach uses different parameterized damage distribution functions to update the stiffness properties of the structure considered. The mathematical formulation allows for an updating procedure that is independent of the FE mesh resolution and free of assumptions about the defect location while only needing few design variables. In this work, the FE model updating procedure is based only on eigenfrequency deviations. The results show a precise localization within ±0.05m of the nine different damage positions and a correct relative quantification of the three different damage scenarios considered. With that, first, it is shown that the deterministic FE model updating procedure presented is suitable for precise damage assessment. Second, this work demonstrates that the opportunity to introduce several reversible damage positions and distinctly defined types and severities of damage into the laboratory experiment presented generally enables the systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods.
AB - In this work, the systematic validation of a deterministic finite element (FE) model updating procedure for damage assessment is presented using a self-developed modular laboratory experiment. A fundamental, systematic validation of damage assessment methods is rarely conducted and in many experimental investigations, only one type of defect is introduced at only one position. Often, the damage inserted is irreversible and inspections are only performed visually. Thus, the damage introduced and, with it, the results of the damage assessment method considered are often not entirely analyzed in terms of quantity and quality. To address this shortcoming, a modular steel cantilever beam is designed with nine reversible damage positions and the option to insert different damage scenarios in a controlled manner. The measurement data are made available in open-access form which enables a systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods. To demonstrate such a systematic validation using the modular laboratory experiment, a deterministic FE model updating procedure previously introduced by the authors is applied and extended. The FE model updating approach uses different parameterized damage distribution functions to update the stiffness properties of the structure considered. The mathematical formulation allows for an updating procedure that is independent of the FE mesh resolution and free of assumptions about the defect location while only needing few design variables. In this work, the FE model updating procedure is based only on eigenfrequency deviations. The results show a precise localization within ±0.05m of the nine different damage positions and a correct relative quantification of the three different damage scenarios considered. With that, first, it is shown that the deterministic FE model updating procedure presented is suitable for precise damage assessment. Second, this work demonstrates that the opportunity to introduce several reversible damage positions and distinctly defined types and severities of damage into the laboratory experiment presented generally enables the systematic experimental validation of damage assessment methods.
KW - Damage assessment
KW - Experimental validation
KW - FE model updating
KW - Modal analysis
KW - Numerical optimization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158861302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13349-023-00701-9
DO - 10.1007/s13349-023-00701-9
M3 - Article
VL - 13
SP - 1185
EP - 1206
JO - Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
JF - Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
IS - 6-7
ER -