Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • University of Cologne

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalSemantics and Pragmatics
Volume10
Publication statusPublished - 20 Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.

Cite this

Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system. / Claus, Berry; Meijer, A. Marlijn ; Repp, Sophie et al.
In: Semantics and Pragmatics, Vol. 10, 20.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Claus B, Meijer AM, Repp S, Krifka M. Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system. Semantics and Pragmatics. 2017 Dec 20;10. doi: 10.3765/sp.10.19
Claus, Berry ; Meijer, A. Marlijn ; Repp, Sophie et al. / Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system. In: Semantics and Pragmatics. 2017 ; Vol. 10.
Download
@article{6d6110b78b9a42c89bae3d51a63d4122,
title = "Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system",
abstract = "This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.",
author = "Berry Claus and Meijer, {A. Marlijn} and Sophie Repp and Manfred Krifka",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "20",
doi = "10.3765/sp.10.19",
language = "English",
volume = "10",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Puzzling response particles: An experimental study on the German answering system

AU - Claus, Berry

AU - Meijer, A. Marlijn

AU - Repp, Sophie

AU - Krifka, Manfred

PY - 2017/12/20

Y1 - 2017/12/20

N2 - This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.

AB - This paper addresses the use and interpretation of the German response particles ja, nein, and doch. In four experiments, we collected acceptability-judgement data for the full paradigm of standard German particles in responses to positive and negative assertions. The experiments were designed to test the empirical validity of two recent accounts of response particles, Roelofsen & Farkas (2015) and Krifka (2013), which view response particles as propositional anaphors. The results for responses to negative antecedents were unpredicted and inconsistent with either account. A further unexpected finding was that there was large interindividual variation in the acceptability patterns for affirming responses to negative antecedents to the extent that most speakers found ja more acceptable whereas some found nein more acceptable. We discuss possible revisions of the two accounts to model the findings, and explore in how far the findings can be accounted for in alternative, ellipsis accounts of response particles.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.10.19

U2 - 10.3765/sp.10.19

DO - 10.3765/sp.10.19

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Semantics and Pragmatics

JF - Semantics and Pragmatics

SN - 1937-8912

ER -

By the same author(s)