Modeling and Error Analysis in Camera-Based Jump Height Measurement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)624-627
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Volume8
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sept 2022

Abstract

Introduction: In this work, we use simulated data to quantify the different failure mechanisms of a previously presented low-cost jump height measurement system, based on widely available consumer smartphone technology. Methods: In order to assess the importance of the different preconditions of the jump height measurement algorithm, we generate a synthetic dataset of 2000 random jump parabolas for 2000 randomly generated persons without real-world artifacts. We then selectively add different perturbations to the parabolas and reconstruct the jump height using the evaluated algorithm. The degree to which the manipulations influence the reconstructed jump height gives us insights into how critical each precondition is for the method’s accuracy. Results: For a subject-to-camera distance of 2.5 meters, we found the most important influences to be tracking inaccuracies and distance changes (non-vertical jumps). These are also the most difficult factors to control. Camera angle and lens distortion are easier to handle in practice and have a very low impact on the reconstructed jump height. The intraclass correlation value ICC(3,1) between true jump height and the reconstruction from distorted data ranges between 0.999 for mild and 0.988 for more severe distortions. Conclusion: Our results support the design of future studies and tools for accurate and affordable jump height measurement, which can be used in individual fitness, sports medicine, and rehabilitation applications.

Keywords

    camera calibration, gravity, parabola, simulation, sports, vertical jump height

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Modeling and Error Analysis in Camera-Based Jump Height Measurement. / Webering, Fritz; Emamzadehei, Leili; Blume, Holger.
In: Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 2, 02.09.2022, p. 624-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Webering F, Emamzadehei L, Blume H. Modeling and Error Analysis in Camera-Based Jump Height Measurement. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering. 2022 Sept 2;8(2):624-627. doi: 10.1515/cdbme-2022-1159, 10.15488/13577
Webering, Fritz ; Emamzadehei, Leili ; Blume, Holger. / Modeling and Error Analysis in Camera-Based Jump Height Measurement. In: Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering. 2022 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 624-627.
Download
@article{26dce44c4d9041b2a5267f910d4a58bd,
title = "Modeling and Error Analysis in Camera-Based Jump Height Measurement",
abstract = "Introduction: In this work, we use simulated data to quantify the different failure mechanisms of a previously presented low-cost jump height measurement system, based on widely available consumer smartphone technology. Methods: In order to assess the importance of the different preconditions of the jump height measurement algorithm, we generate a synthetic dataset of 2000 random jump parabolas for 2000 randomly generated persons without real-world artifacts. We then selectively add different perturbations to the parabolas and reconstruct the jump height using the evaluated algorithm. The degree to which the manipulations influence the reconstructed jump height gives us insights into how critical each precondition is for the method{\textquoteright}s accuracy. Results: For a subject-to-camera distance of 2.5 meters, we found the most important influences to be tracking inaccuracies and distance changes (non-vertical jumps). These are also the most difficult factors to control. Camera angle and lens distortion are easier to handle in practice and have a very low impact on the reconstructed jump height. The intraclass correlation value ICC(3,1) between true jump height and the reconstruction from distorted data ranges between 0.999 for mild and 0.988 for more severe distortions. Conclusion: Our results support the design of future studies and tools for accurate and affordable jump height measurement, which can be used in individual fitness, sports medicine, and rehabilitation applications.",
keywords = "camera calibration, gravity, parabola, simulation, sports, vertical jump height",
author = "Fritz Webering and Leili Emamzadehei and Holger Blume",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1515/cdbme-2022-1159",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "624--627",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling and Error Analysis in Camera-Based Jump Height Measurement

AU - Webering, Fritz

AU - Emamzadehei, Leili

AU - Blume, Holger

PY - 2022/9/2

Y1 - 2022/9/2

N2 - Introduction: In this work, we use simulated data to quantify the different failure mechanisms of a previously presented low-cost jump height measurement system, based on widely available consumer smartphone technology. Methods: In order to assess the importance of the different preconditions of the jump height measurement algorithm, we generate a synthetic dataset of 2000 random jump parabolas for 2000 randomly generated persons without real-world artifacts. We then selectively add different perturbations to the parabolas and reconstruct the jump height using the evaluated algorithm. The degree to which the manipulations influence the reconstructed jump height gives us insights into how critical each precondition is for the method’s accuracy. Results: For a subject-to-camera distance of 2.5 meters, we found the most important influences to be tracking inaccuracies and distance changes (non-vertical jumps). These are also the most difficult factors to control. Camera angle and lens distortion are easier to handle in practice and have a very low impact on the reconstructed jump height. The intraclass correlation value ICC(3,1) between true jump height and the reconstruction from distorted data ranges between 0.999 for mild and 0.988 for more severe distortions. Conclusion: Our results support the design of future studies and tools for accurate and affordable jump height measurement, which can be used in individual fitness, sports medicine, and rehabilitation applications.

AB - Introduction: In this work, we use simulated data to quantify the different failure mechanisms of a previously presented low-cost jump height measurement system, based on widely available consumer smartphone technology. Methods: In order to assess the importance of the different preconditions of the jump height measurement algorithm, we generate a synthetic dataset of 2000 random jump parabolas for 2000 randomly generated persons without real-world artifacts. We then selectively add different perturbations to the parabolas and reconstruct the jump height using the evaluated algorithm. The degree to which the manipulations influence the reconstructed jump height gives us insights into how critical each precondition is for the method’s accuracy. Results: For a subject-to-camera distance of 2.5 meters, we found the most important influences to be tracking inaccuracies and distance changes (non-vertical jumps). These are also the most difficult factors to control. Camera angle and lens distortion are easier to handle in practice and have a very low impact on the reconstructed jump height. The intraclass correlation value ICC(3,1) between true jump height and the reconstruction from distorted data ranges between 0.999 for mild and 0.988 for more severe distortions. Conclusion: Our results support the design of future studies and tools for accurate and affordable jump height measurement, which can be used in individual fitness, sports medicine, and rehabilitation applications.

KW - camera calibration

KW - gravity

KW - parabola

KW - simulation

KW - sports

KW - vertical jump height

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137876077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/cdbme-2022-1159

DO - 10.1515/cdbme-2022-1159

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85137876077

VL - 8

SP - 624

EP - 627

JO - Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering

JF - Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering

IS - 2

ER -

By the same author(s)