Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 352–367 |
| Seitenumfang | 16 |
| Fachzeitschrift | American psychologist |
| Jahrgang | 79 |
| Ausgabenummer | 3 |
| Publikationsstatus | Elektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 2024 |
Abstract
Journal analyses have documented the historical neglect of research pertaining to theMajorityWorld in psychological science, and the need for inclusivity is clearly articulated to ensure a science that is comprehensive and globally applicable. However, no systematic efforts have explored the perspectives of researchers working with Majority World communities regarding the challenges they experience in conducting and disseminating research and ways to address them. Our aim was to explore these challenges from the perspective of these researchers using an embeddedmixed-methods design. Based on responses of 232 researchers who engage in psychological research with Majority World communities (68.1% from Africa, Asia, or Latin America, remaining from the Minority World), we identified challenges in three areas: (a) stemming from an inherent bias against Majority World research, (b) experienced by all researchers, which nonetheless are heightened for those engaging in research with Majority World populations, and (c) specific to researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions. Based on the findings, we recommend journal editorial teams and funding agencies: (a) acknowledge and address the bias inherent in the publication and funding process, (b) recruit editorial teammembers, program officers, and reviewers from the Majority World, (c) train editorial team members, program officers, and reviewers from the Minority World to thoughtfully evaluate Majority World research, and (d) provide resources for researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: American psychologist, Jahrgang 79, Nr. 3, 2024, S. 352–367.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Perspectives of Researchers Engaging in Majority World Research to Promote Diverse and Global Psychological Science
AU - Raval, Vaishali V.
AU - Baiden, Philip
AU - Espinosa-Hernandez, Graciela
AU - Magis-Weinberg, Lucía
AU - Nguyen, Amanda J.
AU - Titzmann, Peter F.
AU - Zheng, Yao
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Journal analyses have documented the historical neglect of research pertaining to theMajorityWorld in psychological science, and the need for inclusivity is clearly articulated to ensure a science that is comprehensive and globally applicable. However, no systematic efforts have explored the perspectives of researchers working with Majority World communities regarding the challenges they experience in conducting and disseminating research and ways to address them. Our aim was to explore these challenges from the perspective of these researchers using an embeddedmixed-methods design. Based on responses of 232 researchers who engage in psychological research with Majority World communities (68.1% from Africa, Asia, or Latin America, remaining from the Minority World), we identified challenges in three areas: (a) stemming from an inherent bias against Majority World research, (b) experienced by all researchers, which nonetheless are heightened for those engaging in research with Majority World populations, and (c) specific to researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions. Based on the findings, we recommend journal editorial teams and funding agencies: (a) acknowledge and address the bias inherent in the publication and funding process, (b) recruit editorial teammembers, program officers, and reviewers from the Majority World, (c) train editorial team members, program officers, and reviewers from the Minority World to thoughtfully evaluate Majority World research, and (d) provide resources for researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions.
AB - Journal analyses have documented the historical neglect of research pertaining to theMajorityWorld in psychological science, and the need for inclusivity is clearly articulated to ensure a science that is comprehensive and globally applicable. However, no systematic efforts have explored the perspectives of researchers working with Majority World communities regarding the challenges they experience in conducting and disseminating research and ways to address them. Our aim was to explore these challenges from the perspective of these researchers using an embeddedmixed-methods design. Based on responses of 232 researchers who engage in psychological research with Majority World communities (68.1% from Africa, Asia, or Latin America, remaining from the Minority World), we identified challenges in three areas: (a) stemming from an inherent bias against Majority World research, (b) experienced by all researchers, which nonetheless are heightened for those engaging in research with Majority World populations, and (c) specific to researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions. Based on the findings, we recommend journal editorial teams and funding agencies: (a) acknowledge and address the bias inherent in the publication and funding process, (b) recruit editorial teammembers, program officers, and reviewers from the Majority World, (c) train editorial team members, program officers, and reviewers from the Minority World to thoughtfully evaluate Majority World research, and (d) provide resources for researchers affiliated with Majority World institutions.
KW - barriers
KW - embeddedmixed-methods design
KW - global psychological science
KW - Majority World
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183410071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/amp0001229
DO - 10.1037/amp0001229
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183410071
VL - 79
SP - 352
EP - 367
JO - American psychologist
JF - American psychologist
SN - 0003-066X
IS - 3
ER -