Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | 119052 |
Fachzeitschrift | Applied energy |
Jahrgang | 316 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 19 Apr. 2022 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 15 Juni 2022 |
Abstract
In the shipping industry, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are a much-discussed technology due to their high energy efficiency, fuel versatility, and emissions reduction potential. In contrast to internal combustion engines, modular SOFC units allow for distributed system configurations without drastically reducing the overall efficiency. Decentralizing the power system with regard to the electrical consumers’ demands reduces both grid size and transmission losses, leading to a reduction of investment and operating costs. Additionally, a modular approach significantly benefits required redundancy aspects. A case study based on a cruise ship with nine fire zones is used to quantify the advantages of a distributed approach from an economic point of view. For this, a design optimization with variable installation location is conducted both with and without component failure considerations. Compared to a central configuration, annual transmission system costs in a distributed approach are reduced by 76% without and 55% with component failure consideration. However, the cost reduction potential proves to be small compared to other matters of expense. The modular system characteristic ensures that minor modifications suffice for component redundancy, resulting in an investment cost increase of less than 2% for both central and distributed configurations.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Bauwesen
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Maschinenbau
- Energie (insg.)
- Allgemeine Energie
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Management, Monitoring, Politik und Recht
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Applied energy, Jahrgang 316, 119052, 15.06.2022.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal Design of a Distributed Ship Power System with Solid Oxide Fuel Cells under the Consideration of Component Malfunctions
AU - Kistner, Lukas
AU - Bensmann, Astrid
AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, Richard
N1 - Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI, funding code 03B10605H ) and the coordination of the “MultiSchIBZ” project by the National Organisation Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology (NOW GmbH). The results presented were achieved by computations carried out on the cluster system at the Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany. Funding Information: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI, funding code 03B10605H) and the coordination of the ?MultiSchIBZ? project by the National Organisation Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology (NOW GmbH). The results presented were achieved by computations carried out on the cluster system at the Leibniz Universit?t Hannover, Germany.
PY - 2022/6/15
Y1 - 2022/6/15
N2 - In the shipping industry, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are a much-discussed technology due to their high energy efficiency, fuel versatility, and emissions reduction potential. In contrast to internal combustion engines, modular SOFC units allow for distributed system configurations without drastically reducing the overall efficiency. Decentralizing the power system with regard to the electrical consumers’ demands reduces both grid size and transmission losses, leading to a reduction of investment and operating costs. Additionally, a modular approach significantly benefits required redundancy aspects. A case study based on a cruise ship with nine fire zones is used to quantify the advantages of a distributed approach from an economic point of view. For this, a design optimization with variable installation location is conducted both with and without component failure considerations. Compared to a central configuration, annual transmission system costs in a distributed approach are reduced by 76% without and 55% with component failure consideration. However, the cost reduction potential proves to be small compared to other matters of expense. The modular system characteristic ensures that minor modifications suffice for component redundancy, resulting in an investment cost increase of less than 2% for both central and distributed configurations.
AB - In the shipping industry, solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) are a much-discussed technology due to their high energy efficiency, fuel versatility, and emissions reduction potential. In contrast to internal combustion engines, modular SOFC units allow for distributed system configurations without drastically reducing the overall efficiency. Decentralizing the power system with regard to the electrical consumers’ demands reduces both grid size and transmission losses, leading to a reduction of investment and operating costs. Additionally, a modular approach significantly benefits required redundancy aspects. A case study based on a cruise ship with nine fire zones is used to quantify the advantages of a distributed approach from an economic point of view. For this, a design optimization with variable installation location is conducted both with and without component failure considerations. Compared to a central configuration, annual transmission system costs in a distributed approach are reduced by 76% without and 55% with component failure consideration. However, the cost reduction potential proves to be small compared to other matters of expense. The modular system characteristic ensures that minor modifications suffice for component redundancy, resulting in an investment cost increase of less than 2% for both central and distributed configurations.
KW - Component redundancy
KW - Distributed ship power system
KW - Energy system design optimization
KW - Modular power system
KW - Shipboard microgrid
KW - Solid oxide fuel cells
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128705583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119052
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119052
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85128705583
VL - 316
JO - Applied energy
JF - Applied energy
SN - 0306-2619
M1 - 119052
ER -