When to use a metaphor: Metaphors in dialogical explanations with addressees of different expertise

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Paderborn University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number1474924
JournalFrontiers in Language Sciences
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2024

Abstract

The present study aims to understand how metaphors are used in explanations. According to many current theories, metaphors have a conceptual function for the understanding of abstract objects. From this theoretical assumption, we derived the hypothesis that the lower the expertise of the addressee of an explanation, the more metaphors should be used. We tested this hypothesis on a relatively natural data set of 24 published videos with close to 100,000 words overall in which experts explain abstract, mostly scientific concepts to persons of different expertise, varying from minimal (children) to profound (expert). Contrary to our expectations, the frequency of metaphors did not decrease with expertise, but actually increased. This increase could be statistically substantiated with higher differences in expertise. The study contributes to a better understanding of the use of metaphors in actual explanatory processes and how metaphor use depends on contextual factors. It thus supports the expansion of the conceptual and linguistic perspective on metaphors to include the aspect of how metaphors are used by speakers.

Keywords

    conceptual metaphor, conceptual metaphor theory, explaining, explanation, metaphor, metaphor usage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

When to use a metaphor: Metaphors in dialogical explanations with addressees of different expertise. / Scharlau, Ingrid; Körber, Miriam; Sengupta, Meghdut et al.
In: Frontiers in Language Sciences, Vol. 3, 1474924, 18.12.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Scharlau I, Körber M, Sengupta M, Wachsmuth H. When to use a metaphor: Metaphors in dialogical explanations with addressees of different expertise. Frontiers in Language Sciences. 2024 Dec 18;3:1474924. doi: 10.3389/flang.2024.1474924
Scharlau, Ingrid ; Körber, Miriam ; Sengupta, Meghdut et al. / When to use a metaphor : Metaphors in dialogical explanations with addressees of different expertise. In: Frontiers in Language Sciences. 2024 ; Vol. 3.
Download
@article{6d1f2482c8794613a4906f3bd3bf6d58,
title = "When to use a metaphor: Metaphors in dialogical explanations with addressees of different expertise",
abstract = "The present study aims to understand how metaphors are used in explanations. According to many current theories, metaphors have a conceptual function for the understanding of abstract objects. From this theoretical assumption, we derived the hypothesis that the lower the expertise of the addressee of an explanation, the more metaphors should be used. We tested this hypothesis on a relatively natural data set of 24 published videos with close to 100,000 words overall in which experts explain abstract, mostly scientific concepts to persons of different expertise, varying from minimal (children) to profound (expert). Contrary to our expectations, the frequency of metaphors did not decrease with expertise, but actually increased. This increase could be statistically substantiated with higher differences in expertise. The study contributes to a better understanding of the use of metaphors in actual explanatory processes and how metaphor use depends on contextual factors. It thus supports the expansion of the conceptual and linguistic perspective on metaphors to include the aspect of how metaphors are used by speakers.",
keywords = "conceptual metaphor, conceptual metaphor theory, explaining, explanation, metaphor, metaphor usage",
author = "Ingrid Scharlau and Miriam K{\"o}rber and Meghdut Sengupta and Henning Wachsmuth",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2024 Scharlau, K{\"o}rber, Sengupta and Wachsmuth.",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
day = "18",
doi = "10.3389/flang.2024.1474924",
language = "English",
volume = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - When to use a metaphor

T2 - Metaphors in dialogical explanations with addressees of different expertise

AU - Scharlau, Ingrid

AU - Körber, Miriam

AU - Sengupta, Meghdut

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2024 Scharlau, Körber, Sengupta and Wachsmuth.

PY - 2024/12/18

Y1 - 2024/12/18

N2 - The present study aims to understand how metaphors are used in explanations. According to many current theories, metaphors have a conceptual function for the understanding of abstract objects. From this theoretical assumption, we derived the hypothesis that the lower the expertise of the addressee of an explanation, the more metaphors should be used. We tested this hypothesis on a relatively natural data set of 24 published videos with close to 100,000 words overall in which experts explain abstract, mostly scientific concepts to persons of different expertise, varying from minimal (children) to profound (expert). Contrary to our expectations, the frequency of metaphors did not decrease with expertise, but actually increased. This increase could be statistically substantiated with higher differences in expertise. The study contributes to a better understanding of the use of metaphors in actual explanatory processes and how metaphor use depends on contextual factors. It thus supports the expansion of the conceptual and linguistic perspective on metaphors to include the aspect of how metaphors are used by speakers.

AB - The present study aims to understand how metaphors are used in explanations. According to many current theories, metaphors have a conceptual function for the understanding of abstract objects. From this theoretical assumption, we derived the hypothesis that the lower the expertise of the addressee of an explanation, the more metaphors should be used. We tested this hypothesis on a relatively natural data set of 24 published videos with close to 100,000 words overall in which experts explain abstract, mostly scientific concepts to persons of different expertise, varying from minimal (children) to profound (expert). Contrary to our expectations, the frequency of metaphors did not decrease with expertise, but actually increased. This increase could be statistically substantiated with higher differences in expertise. The study contributes to a better understanding of the use of metaphors in actual explanatory processes and how metaphor use depends on contextual factors. It thus supports the expansion of the conceptual and linguistic perspective on metaphors to include the aspect of how metaphors are used by speakers.

KW - conceptual metaphor

KW - conceptual metaphor theory

KW - explaining

KW - explanation

KW - metaphor

KW - metaphor usage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105013897635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/flang.2024.1474924

DO - 10.3389/flang.2024.1474924

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Frontiers in Language Sciences

JF - Frontiers in Language Sciences

M1 - 1474924

ER -

By the same author(s)