Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Thought styles

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Nicola Mößner

Research Organisations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationElgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages524-528
Number of pages5
ISBN (electronic)9781035317967
ISBN (print)9781035317950
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2024

Abstract

In this entry, the origin of the concept ‘thought style’ will be traced back to Karl Mannheim’s work in the sociology of knowledge. Afterwards, the most influential version today—Ludwik Fleck’s concept of thought styles—will be discussed in detail. This entry will examine: (1) the different elements of which a thought style is composed, and (2) its epistemological and ontological consequences. In this context, it will be pointed out that problems of understanding between adherents of different thought styles can arise due to their different ontological commitments. Furthermore, (3), the virtues and vices of thought styles as an analytical tool for examining scientific activities will be analysed. Here, the apparent relativistic consequences of thought styles and Fleck’s puzzling stance regarding relativistic claims concerning his theory will be discussed. Finally, (4), a closer look will be taken at the relation between art and science that the term ‘style’ brings to the fore.

Keywords

    Art and science, Karl Mannheim, Ludwik Fleck, Philosophy of science, Progress, Relativism, Sociology of knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Thought styles. / Mößner, Nicola.
Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2024. p. 524-528.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Mößner, N 2024, Thought styles. in Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., pp. 524-528. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317967.ch115
Mößner, N. (2024). Thought styles. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity (pp. 524-528). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035317967.ch115
Mößner N. Thought styles. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2024. p. 524-528 doi: 10.4337/9781035317967.ch115
Mößner, Nicola. / Thought styles. Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2024. pp. 524-528
Download
@inbook{c808d26aafd546a6910b4d19b8c19e31,
title = "Thought styles",
abstract = "In this entry, the origin of the concept {\textquoteleft}thought style{\textquoteright} will be traced back to Karl Mannheim{\textquoteright}s work in the sociology of knowledge. Afterwards, the most influential version today—Ludwik Fleck{\textquoteright}s concept of thought styles—will be discussed in detail. This entry will examine: (1) the different elements of which a thought style is composed, and (2) its epistemological and ontological consequences. In this context, it will be pointed out that problems of understanding between adherents of different thought styles can arise due to their different ontological commitments. Furthermore, (3), the virtues and vices of thought styles as an analytical tool for examining scientific activities will be analysed. Here, the apparent relativistic consequences of thought styles and Fleck{\textquoteright}s puzzling stance regarding relativistic claims concerning his theory will be discussed. Finally, (4), a closer look will be taken at the relation between art and science that the term {\textquoteleft}style{\textquoteright} brings to the fore.",
keywords = "Art and science, Karl Mannheim, Ludwik Fleck, Philosophy of science, Progress, Relativism, Sociology of knowledge",
author = "Nicola M{\"o}{\ss}ner",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Editor and Contributing Authors Severally 2024.",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
day = "20",
doi = "10.4337/9781035317967.ch115",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781035317950",
pages = "524--528",
booktitle = "Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.",
address = "United Kingdom (UK)",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Thought styles

AU - Mößner, Nicola

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Editor and Contributing Authors Severally 2024.

PY - 2024/6/20

Y1 - 2024/6/20

N2 - In this entry, the origin of the concept ‘thought style’ will be traced back to Karl Mannheim’s work in the sociology of knowledge. Afterwards, the most influential version today—Ludwik Fleck’s concept of thought styles—will be discussed in detail. This entry will examine: (1) the different elements of which a thought style is composed, and (2) its epistemological and ontological consequences. In this context, it will be pointed out that problems of understanding between adherents of different thought styles can arise due to their different ontological commitments. Furthermore, (3), the virtues and vices of thought styles as an analytical tool for examining scientific activities will be analysed. Here, the apparent relativistic consequences of thought styles and Fleck’s puzzling stance regarding relativistic claims concerning his theory will be discussed. Finally, (4), a closer look will be taken at the relation between art and science that the term ‘style’ brings to the fore.

AB - In this entry, the origin of the concept ‘thought style’ will be traced back to Karl Mannheim’s work in the sociology of knowledge. Afterwards, the most influential version today—Ludwik Fleck’s concept of thought styles—will be discussed in detail. This entry will examine: (1) the different elements of which a thought style is composed, and (2) its epistemological and ontological consequences. In this context, it will be pointed out that problems of understanding between adherents of different thought styles can arise due to their different ontological commitments. Furthermore, (3), the virtues and vices of thought styles as an analytical tool for examining scientific activities will be analysed. Here, the apparent relativistic consequences of thought styles and Fleck’s puzzling stance regarding relativistic claims concerning his theory will be discussed. Finally, (4), a closer look will be taken at the relation between art and science that the term ‘style’ brings to the fore.

KW - Art and science

KW - Karl Mannheim

KW - Ludwik Fleck

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Progress

KW - Relativism

KW - Sociology of knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213172024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4337/9781035317967.ch115

DO - 10.4337/9781035317967.ch115

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

AN - SCOPUS:85213172024

SN - 9781035317950

SP - 524

EP - 528

BT - Elgar Encyclopedia of Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

ER -