The probability of type I and type II errors in imprecise hypothesis testing with an application to geodetic deformation analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-306
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Reliability and Safety
Volume3
Issue number1-3
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Jun 2009

Abstract

In many engineering disciplines the interesting model parameters are estimated from a large number of heterogeneous and redundant observations by a least-squares adjustment. The significance of the model parameters, outlier detection and the model selection itself are checked within statistical hypothesis tests. The acceptance and the rejection of the hypothesis are strongly related with two types of errors. A type I error occurs if the null hypothesis is rejected, although it is true. A type II error occurs if the null hypothesis is accepted, although it is false. This paper proposes a general procedure to hypothesis testing in linear parameter estimation, if the uncertainty is considered by random variability and interval/fuzzy errors. The study focuses on the probability of type I and type II errors. The applied procedure is outlined in detail showing both theory and numerical examples for the parameterisation of a geodetic monitoring network (deformation analysis).

Keywords

    Fuzzy, Hypothesis testing, Imprecision, Linear models, Probability, Type I error, Type II error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

The probability of type I and type II errors in imprecise hypothesis testing with an application to geodetic deformation analysis. / Neumann, Ingo; Kutterer, Hansjörg.
In: International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Vol. 3, No. 1-3, 27.06.2009, p. 286-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Neumann I, Kutterer H. The probability of type I and type II errors in imprecise hypothesis testing with an application to geodetic deformation analysis. International Journal of Reliability and Safety. 2009 Jun 27;3(1-3):286-306. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
Neumann, Ingo ; Kutterer, Hansjörg. / The probability of type I and type II errors in imprecise hypothesis testing with an application to geodetic deformation analysis. In: International Journal of Reliability and Safety. 2009 ; Vol. 3, No. 1-3. pp. 286-306.
Download
@article{39d9336d4d6d4acf9f8c7838c261d919,
title = "The probability of type I and type II errors in imprecise hypothesis testing with an application to geodetic deformation analysis",
abstract = "In many engineering disciplines the interesting model parameters are estimated from a large number of heterogeneous and redundant observations by a least-squares adjustment. The significance of the model parameters, outlier detection and the model selection itself are checked within statistical hypothesis tests. The acceptance and the rejection of the hypothesis are strongly related with two types of errors. A type I error occurs if the null hypothesis is rejected, although it is true. A type II error occurs if the null hypothesis is accepted, although it is false. This paper proposes a general procedure to hypothesis testing in linear parameter estimation, if the uncertainty is considered by random variability and interval/fuzzy errors. The study focuses on the probability of type I and type II errors. The applied procedure is outlined in detail showing both theory and numerical examples for the parameterisation of a geodetic monitoring network (deformation analysis).",
keywords = "Fuzzy, Hypothesis testing, Imprecision, Linear models, Probability, Type I error, Type II error",
author = "Ingo Neumann and Hansj{\"o}rg Kutterer",
year = "2009",
month = jun,
day = "27",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "286--306",
number = "1-3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The probability of type I and type II errors in imprecise hypothesis testing with an application to geodetic deformation analysis

AU - Neumann, Ingo

AU - Kutterer, Hansjörg

PY - 2009/6/27

Y1 - 2009/6/27

N2 - In many engineering disciplines the interesting model parameters are estimated from a large number of heterogeneous and redundant observations by a least-squares adjustment. The significance of the model parameters, outlier detection and the model selection itself are checked within statistical hypothesis tests. The acceptance and the rejection of the hypothesis are strongly related with two types of errors. A type I error occurs if the null hypothesis is rejected, although it is true. A type II error occurs if the null hypothesis is accepted, although it is false. This paper proposes a general procedure to hypothesis testing in linear parameter estimation, if the uncertainty is considered by random variability and interval/fuzzy errors. The study focuses on the probability of type I and type II errors. The applied procedure is outlined in detail showing both theory and numerical examples for the parameterisation of a geodetic monitoring network (deformation analysis).

AB - In many engineering disciplines the interesting model parameters are estimated from a large number of heterogeneous and redundant observations by a least-squares adjustment. The significance of the model parameters, outlier detection and the model selection itself are checked within statistical hypothesis tests. The acceptance and the rejection of the hypothesis are strongly related with two types of errors. A type I error occurs if the null hypothesis is rejected, although it is true. A type II error occurs if the null hypothesis is accepted, although it is false. This paper proposes a general procedure to hypothesis testing in linear parameter estimation, if the uncertainty is considered by random variability and interval/fuzzy errors. The study focuses on the probability of type I and type II errors. The applied procedure is outlined in detail showing both theory and numerical examples for the parameterisation of a geodetic monitoring network (deformation analysis).

KW - Fuzzy

KW - Hypothesis testing

KW - Imprecision

KW - Linear models

KW - Probability

KW - Type I error

KW - Type II error

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651591317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78651591317

VL - 3

SP - 286

EP - 306

JO - International Journal of Reliability and Safety

JF - International Journal of Reliability and Safety

SN - 1479-389X

IS - 1-3

ER -

By the same author(s)