The economic relevance of sustainable agroforestry practices - An empirical analysis from Tanzania

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Anja Faße
  • Ulrike Grote
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-96
Number of pages11
JournalEcological economics
Volume94
Early online date13 Aug 2013
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

Abstract

This paper investigates the economic relevance of sustainable behavior of agroforestry practices for smallholders using the example of firewood exploitation in rural Tanzania. Three questions are addressed: (1) To what extent do households behave sustainably regarding firewood extraction from agroforestry? (2) Which factors determine the likelihood of households practicing sustainable agroforestry? (3) Are sustainably behaving households better off in terms of income compared to households practicing unsustainable agroforestry? The analysis is based on cross-sectional data of 314 households. A sustainability indicator shows that the share of sustainable households varies between 14 and 41% depending on the underlying wood growth rate. The results of the logistic regression indicate that property rights regarding the ownership of agricultural land and environmental awareness increase the likelihood of sustainable firewood extraction. Empirical evidence from the quantile regression reveals that poorest households generate higher income if they extract firewood unsustainably. The opposite is true for households of upper income percentiles. Thus, the poor are likely to increase environmental degradation to generate more income causing a 'downward spiral' of the poverty-environment trap resulting in income losses in the long run. Households with a per capita income of 524 TZS or more manage their tree stocks sustainably.

Keywords

    Agroforestry, Impact assessment, Logistic regression, Quantile regression, Tanzania

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

The economic relevance of sustainable agroforestry practices - An empirical analysis from Tanzania. / Faße, Anja; Grote, Ulrike.
In: Ecological economics, Vol. 94, 10.2013, p. 86-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Faße A, Grote U. The economic relevance of sustainable agroforestry practices - An empirical analysis from Tanzania. Ecological economics. 2013 Oct;94:86-96. Epub 2013 Aug 13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.008
Download
@article{3ee6f721b81649d0bad6958274920fc5,
title = "The economic relevance of sustainable agroforestry practices - An empirical analysis from Tanzania",
abstract = "This paper investigates the economic relevance of sustainable behavior of agroforestry practices for smallholders using the example of firewood exploitation in rural Tanzania. Three questions are addressed: (1) To what extent do households behave sustainably regarding firewood extraction from agroforestry? (2) Which factors determine the likelihood of households practicing sustainable agroforestry? (3) Are sustainably behaving households better off in terms of income compared to households practicing unsustainable agroforestry? The analysis is based on cross-sectional data of 314 households. A sustainability indicator shows that the share of sustainable households varies between 14 and 41% depending on the underlying wood growth rate. The results of the logistic regression indicate that property rights regarding the ownership of agricultural land and environmental awareness increase the likelihood of sustainable firewood extraction. Empirical evidence from the quantile regression reveals that poorest households generate higher income if they extract firewood unsustainably. The opposite is true for households of upper income percentiles. Thus, the poor are likely to increase environmental degradation to generate more income causing a 'downward spiral' of the poverty-environment trap resulting in income losses in the long run. Households with a per capita income of 524 TZS or more manage their tree stocks sustainably.",
keywords = "Agroforestry, Impact assessment, Logistic regression, Quantile regression, Tanzania",
author = "Anja Fa{\ss}e and Ulrike Grote",
note = "Funding Information: The paper has been written in the context of the project “Strategies to use Biofuel Value Chain Potential in Sub-Saharan Africa to respond to Global Change — Enhancing low-productivity Farming in Tanzania and linking to SMEs” ( http://www.better-is.com/ ). The project was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) under the umbrella of the GIZ (former GTZ) project “Advisory Service on Agricultural Research for Development” (BEAF). ",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.008",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "86--96",
journal = "Ecological economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The economic relevance of sustainable agroforestry practices - An empirical analysis from Tanzania

AU - Faße, Anja

AU - Grote, Ulrike

N1 - Funding Information: The paper has been written in the context of the project “Strategies to use Biofuel Value Chain Potential in Sub-Saharan Africa to respond to Global Change — Enhancing low-productivity Farming in Tanzania and linking to SMEs” ( http://www.better-is.com/ ). The project was funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) under the umbrella of the GIZ (former GTZ) project “Advisory Service on Agricultural Research for Development” (BEAF).

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - This paper investigates the economic relevance of sustainable behavior of agroforestry practices for smallholders using the example of firewood exploitation in rural Tanzania. Three questions are addressed: (1) To what extent do households behave sustainably regarding firewood extraction from agroforestry? (2) Which factors determine the likelihood of households practicing sustainable agroforestry? (3) Are sustainably behaving households better off in terms of income compared to households practicing unsustainable agroforestry? The analysis is based on cross-sectional data of 314 households. A sustainability indicator shows that the share of sustainable households varies between 14 and 41% depending on the underlying wood growth rate. The results of the logistic regression indicate that property rights regarding the ownership of agricultural land and environmental awareness increase the likelihood of sustainable firewood extraction. Empirical evidence from the quantile regression reveals that poorest households generate higher income if they extract firewood unsustainably. The opposite is true for households of upper income percentiles. Thus, the poor are likely to increase environmental degradation to generate more income causing a 'downward spiral' of the poverty-environment trap resulting in income losses in the long run. Households with a per capita income of 524 TZS or more manage their tree stocks sustainably.

AB - This paper investigates the economic relevance of sustainable behavior of agroforestry practices for smallholders using the example of firewood exploitation in rural Tanzania. Three questions are addressed: (1) To what extent do households behave sustainably regarding firewood extraction from agroforestry? (2) Which factors determine the likelihood of households practicing sustainable agroforestry? (3) Are sustainably behaving households better off in terms of income compared to households practicing unsustainable agroforestry? The analysis is based on cross-sectional data of 314 households. A sustainability indicator shows that the share of sustainable households varies between 14 and 41% depending on the underlying wood growth rate. The results of the logistic regression indicate that property rights regarding the ownership of agricultural land and environmental awareness increase the likelihood of sustainable firewood extraction. Empirical evidence from the quantile regression reveals that poorest households generate higher income if they extract firewood unsustainably. The opposite is true for households of upper income percentiles. Thus, the poor are likely to increase environmental degradation to generate more income causing a 'downward spiral' of the poverty-environment trap resulting in income losses in the long run. Households with a per capita income of 524 TZS or more manage their tree stocks sustainably.

KW - Agroforestry

KW - Impact assessment

KW - Logistic regression

KW - Quantile regression

KW - Tanzania

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882786902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84882786902

VL - 94

SP - 86

EP - 96

JO - Ecological economics

JF - Ecological economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -