Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 102746 |
| Journal | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction |
| Volume | 70 |
| Early online date | 27 Dec 2021 |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Feb 2022 |
Abstract
Focusing on the Fukushima Daiich nuclear power plant (NPP) disaster, as well experience from other NPP disasters, this paper describes what off-site arrangements for protecting the population were in place prior to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP disaster, what response actions were taken and identifies important insights related to protecting the population in a multifaceted technological disaster. This paper particularly focuses on urgent protective actions, which need to be taken promptly in order to be effective in reducing the risk to the population from ionising radiation: evacuation, sheltering and iodine thyroid blocking (ITB). Many national response arrangements for NPP disasters continue – even 10 years after the Fukushima Daiich NPP disaster – to rely on decision support systems, such as dose projection models, to inform off-site decision-making during the response to a disaster. This is despite experience demonstrating that such models would probably, in most cases, be ineffective early on in the response. The fundamental problem is not the improvement of decision support systems, but the strategy to ensure the effective protection of the population and reduce their risk. This research will help policymakers, environmental scientists, and disaster response planners to focus and prioritise resources on those high-level insights that need to be addressed to ensure effective protection of the population living in the vicinity of an NPP.
Keywords
- Dose projection models, Evacuation, Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant disaster, Iodine thyroid blocking, Protective action strategies, Protective actions, Risk reduction, Sheltering, Technological disasters
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
- Social Sciences(all)
- Safety Research
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geology
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 70, 102746, 15.02.2022.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ten years since the Fukushima Daiichi NPP disaster
T2 - What's important when protecting the population from a multifaceted technological disaster
AU - Callen-Kovtunova, Jessica
AU - Homma, Toshimitsu
PY - 2022/2/15
Y1 - 2022/2/15
N2 - Focusing on the Fukushima Daiich nuclear power plant (NPP) disaster, as well experience from other NPP disasters, this paper describes what off-site arrangements for protecting the population were in place prior to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP disaster, what response actions were taken and identifies important insights related to protecting the population in a multifaceted technological disaster. This paper particularly focuses on urgent protective actions, which need to be taken promptly in order to be effective in reducing the risk to the population from ionising radiation: evacuation, sheltering and iodine thyroid blocking (ITB). Many national response arrangements for NPP disasters continue – even 10 years after the Fukushima Daiich NPP disaster – to rely on decision support systems, such as dose projection models, to inform off-site decision-making during the response to a disaster. This is despite experience demonstrating that such models would probably, in most cases, be ineffective early on in the response. The fundamental problem is not the improvement of decision support systems, but the strategy to ensure the effective protection of the population and reduce their risk. This research will help policymakers, environmental scientists, and disaster response planners to focus and prioritise resources on those high-level insights that need to be addressed to ensure effective protection of the population living in the vicinity of an NPP.
AB - Focusing on the Fukushima Daiich nuclear power plant (NPP) disaster, as well experience from other NPP disasters, this paper describes what off-site arrangements for protecting the population were in place prior to the Fukushima Daiichi NPP disaster, what response actions were taken and identifies important insights related to protecting the population in a multifaceted technological disaster. This paper particularly focuses on urgent protective actions, which need to be taken promptly in order to be effective in reducing the risk to the population from ionising radiation: evacuation, sheltering and iodine thyroid blocking (ITB). Many national response arrangements for NPP disasters continue – even 10 years after the Fukushima Daiich NPP disaster – to rely on decision support systems, such as dose projection models, to inform off-site decision-making during the response to a disaster. This is despite experience demonstrating that such models would probably, in most cases, be ineffective early on in the response. The fundamental problem is not the improvement of decision support systems, but the strategy to ensure the effective protection of the population and reduce their risk. This research will help policymakers, environmental scientists, and disaster response planners to focus and prioritise resources on those high-level insights that need to be addressed to ensure effective protection of the population living in the vicinity of an NPP.
KW - Dose projection models
KW - Evacuation
KW - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant disaster
KW - Iodine thyroid blocking
KW - Protective action strategies
KW - Protective actions
KW - Risk reduction
KW - Sheltering
KW - Technological disasters
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122068950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102746
DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102746
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122068950
VL - 70
JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
SN - 2212-4209
M1 - 102746
ER -