Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 45-54 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of hydrology |
Volume | 484 |
Publication status | Published - 25 Mar 2013 |
Abstract
Despite growing knowledge about water repellent soils it is not well investigated how soil water repellency (SWR) of a lower level influences the in situ water infiltration into soils. Hence, we investigated a sandy soil where we found subcritical water repellency and unexpected stable (persistent) contact angles (CAs) in the subsoil characterized by CA measurements in the laboratory. To characterize the influence of this persistence on in situ water infiltration, a ponded tracer infiltration experiment was carried out. During the infiltration, hydraulic sensors revealed a slight saturation at the wetting front which is a sign for unstable flow. The excavated dye-stained infiltration zone was conical and its lateral extent decreased with increasing depth, showing characteristics of a macro-finger. We suggest the subsoil to exhibit a strong hysteretic water retention characteristic governing the infiltration process, but we could not verify this by standard laboratory measurements, as strongly persistent SWR prevented the fast wetting of the soil samples. Close to saturation the persistence of SWR led to a wetting period of soil samples of at least 56. days to overcome SWR and reaching an equilibrium state. There are three major conclusions of this study: 1. In contrast to many other studies we found persistent SWR also in the subsoil and not only in the humic topsoil, 2. The shape of the wetting front is contrary to common expectations for homogeneous sandy soils and 3. The wettability characteristics found might also be relevant for assessing infiltration dynamics at other sites regarding the fact that those observations are not obvious.
Keywords
- Macro-finger, Ponded infiltration, Stable contact angles, Unstable flow, Water repellency
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Water Science and Technology
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of hydrology, Vol. 484, 25.03.2013, p. 45-54.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Specific processes during in situ infiltration into a sandy soil with low-level water repellency
AU - Ganz, Christina
AU - Bachmann, Jörg
AU - Lamparter, Axel
AU - Woche, Susanne K.
AU - Duijnisveld, Wilhelmus H.M.
AU - Göbel, Marc O.
N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/3/25
Y1 - 2013/3/25
N2 - Despite growing knowledge about water repellent soils it is not well investigated how soil water repellency (SWR) of a lower level influences the in situ water infiltration into soils. Hence, we investigated a sandy soil where we found subcritical water repellency and unexpected stable (persistent) contact angles (CAs) in the subsoil characterized by CA measurements in the laboratory. To characterize the influence of this persistence on in situ water infiltration, a ponded tracer infiltration experiment was carried out. During the infiltration, hydraulic sensors revealed a slight saturation at the wetting front which is a sign for unstable flow. The excavated dye-stained infiltration zone was conical and its lateral extent decreased with increasing depth, showing characteristics of a macro-finger. We suggest the subsoil to exhibit a strong hysteretic water retention characteristic governing the infiltration process, but we could not verify this by standard laboratory measurements, as strongly persistent SWR prevented the fast wetting of the soil samples. Close to saturation the persistence of SWR led to a wetting period of soil samples of at least 56. days to overcome SWR and reaching an equilibrium state. There are three major conclusions of this study: 1. In contrast to many other studies we found persistent SWR also in the subsoil and not only in the humic topsoil, 2. The shape of the wetting front is contrary to common expectations for homogeneous sandy soils and 3. The wettability characteristics found might also be relevant for assessing infiltration dynamics at other sites regarding the fact that those observations are not obvious.
AB - Despite growing knowledge about water repellent soils it is not well investigated how soil water repellency (SWR) of a lower level influences the in situ water infiltration into soils. Hence, we investigated a sandy soil where we found subcritical water repellency and unexpected stable (persistent) contact angles (CAs) in the subsoil characterized by CA measurements in the laboratory. To characterize the influence of this persistence on in situ water infiltration, a ponded tracer infiltration experiment was carried out. During the infiltration, hydraulic sensors revealed a slight saturation at the wetting front which is a sign for unstable flow. The excavated dye-stained infiltration zone was conical and its lateral extent decreased with increasing depth, showing characteristics of a macro-finger. We suggest the subsoil to exhibit a strong hysteretic water retention characteristic governing the infiltration process, but we could not verify this by standard laboratory measurements, as strongly persistent SWR prevented the fast wetting of the soil samples. Close to saturation the persistence of SWR led to a wetting period of soil samples of at least 56. days to overcome SWR and reaching an equilibrium state. There are three major conclusions of this study: 1. In contrast to many other studies we found persistent SWR also in the subsoil and not only in the humic topsoil, 2. The shape of the wetting front is contrary to common expectations for homogeneous sandy soils and 3. The wettability characteristics found might also be relevant for assessing infiltration dynamics at other sites regarding the fact that those observations are not obvious.
KW - Macro-finger
KW - Ponded infiltration
KW - Stable contact angles
KW - Unstable flow
KW - Water repellency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875397552&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84875397552
VL - 484
SP - 45
EP - 54
JO - Journal of hydrology
JF - Journal of hydrology
SN - 0022-1694
ER -