Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Andras Polyak
  • Heidi Harting
  • Nina Angrisani
  • Timo Herrmann
  • Nina Ehlert
  • Jessica Meißner
  • Michael Willmann
  • Silav Al-Bazaz
  • Tobias L. Ross
  • Jens P. Bankstahl
  • Janin Reifenrath

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • NIFE - Lower Saxony Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development
  • Hannover Medical School (MHH)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine of Hannover, Foundation
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number270
JournalJournal of nanobiotechnology
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date17 Aug 2023
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Abstract

Background: Implant infections caused by biofilm forming bacteria are a major threat in orthopedic surgery. Delivering antibiotics directly to an implant affected by a bacterial biofilm via superparamagnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles could present a promising approach. Nevertheless, short blood circulation half-life because of rapid interactions of nanoparticles with the host’s immune system hinder them from being clinically used. The aim of this study was to determine the temporal in vivo resolution of magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticle (MNPSNP) distribution and the effect of PEGylation and clodronate application using PET/CT imaging and gamma counting in an implant mouse model. Methods: PEGylated and non-PEGylated MNPSNPs were radiolabeled with gallium-68 (68Ga), implementing the chelator tris(hydroxypyridinone). 36 mice were included in the study, 24 mice received a magnetic implant subcutaneously on the left and a titanium implant on the right hind leg. MNPSNP pharmacokinetics and implant accumulation was analyzed in dependence on PEGylation and additional clodronate application. Subsequently gamma counting was performed for further final analysis. Results: The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of all radiolabeled nanoparticles could clearly be visualized and followed by dynamic PET/CT imaging. Both variants of 68Ga-labeled MNPSNP accumulated mainly in liver and spleen. PEGylation of the nanoparticles already resulted in lower liver uptakes. Combination with macrophage depletion led to a highly significant effect whereas macrophage depletion alone could not reveal significant differences. Although MNPSNP accumulation around implants was low in comparison to the inner organs in PET/CT imaging, gamma counting displayed a significantly higher %I.D./g for the tissue surrounding the magnetic implants compared to the titanium control. Additional PEGylation and/or macrophage depletion revealed no significant differences regarding nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site. Conclusion: Tracking of 68Ga-labeled nanoparticles in a mouse model in the first critical hours post-injection by PET/CT imaging provided a better understanding of MNPSNP distribution, elimination and accumulation. Although PEGylation increases circulation time, nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site was still insufficient for infection treatment and additional efforts are needed to increase local accumulation.

Keywords

    Core–shell nanoparticles, Drug delivery systems, Implant imaging, Macrophage depletion, Magnetic targeting, PEGylation, PET imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles. / Polyak, Andras; Harting, Heidi; Angrisani, Nina et al.
In: Journal of nanobiotechnology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 270, 12.2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Polyak, A, Harting, H, Angrisani, N, Herrmann, T, Ehlert, N, Meißner, J, Willmann, M, Al-Bazaz, S, Ross, TL, Bankstahl, JP & Reifenrath, J 2023, 'Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles', Journal of nanobiotechnology, vol. 21, no. 1, 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02041-8
Polyak, A., Harting, H., Angrisani, N., Herrmann, T., Ehlert, N., Meißner, J., Willmann, M., Al-Bazaz, S., Ross, T. L., Bankstahl, J. P., & Reifenrath, J. (2023). Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of nanobiotechnology, 21(1), Article 270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02041-8
Polyak A, Harting H, Angrisani N, Herrmann T, Ehlert N, Meißner J et al. Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of nanobiotechnology. 2023 Dec;21(1):270. Epub 2023 Aug 17. doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-02041-8
Polyak, Andras ; Harting, Heidi ; Angrisani, Nina et al. / Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles. In: Journal of nanobiotechnology. 2023 ; Vol. 21, No. 1.
Download
@article{e670b3c066b447ae8058a0dfe9f32f57,
title = "Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles",
abstract = "Background: Implant infections caused by biofilm forming bacteria are a major threat in orthopedic surgery. Delivering antibiotics directly to an implant affected by a bacterial biofilm via superparamagnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles could present a promising approach. Nevertheless, short blood circulation half-life because of rapid interactions of nanoparticles with the host{\textquoteright}s immune system hinder them from being clinically used. The aim of this study was to determine the temporal in vivo resolution of magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticle (MNPSNP) distribution and the effect of PEGylation and clodronate application using PET/CT imaging and gamma counting in an implant mouse model. Methods: PEGylated and non-PEGylated MNPSNPs were radiolabeled with gallium-68 (68Ga), implementing the chelator tris(hydroxypyridinone). 36 mice were included in the study, 24 mice received a magnetic implant subcutaneously on the left and a titanium implant on the right hind leg. MNPSNP pharmacokinetics and implant accumulation was analyzed in dependence on PEGylation and additional clodronate application. Subsequently gamma counting was performed for further final analysis. Results: The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of all radiolabeled nanoparticles could clearly be visualized and followed by dynamic PET/CT imaging. Both variants of 68Ga-labeled MNPSNP accumulated mainly in liver and spleen. PEGylation of the nanoparticles already resulted in lower liver uptakes. Combination with macrophage depletion led to a highly significant effect whereas macrophage depletion alone could not reveal significant differences. Although MNPSNP accumulation around implants was low in comparison to the inner organs in PET/CT imaging, gamma counting displayed a significantly higher %I.D./g for the tissue surrounding the magnetic implants compared to the titanium control. Additional PEGylation and/or macrophage depletion revealed no significant differences regarding nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site. Conclusion: Tracking of 68Ga-labeled nanoparticles in a mouse model in the first critical hours post-injection by PET/CT imaging provided a better understanding of MNPSNP distribution, elimination and accumulation. Although PEGylation increases circulation time, nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site was still insufficient for infection treatment and additional efforts are needed to increase local accumulation.",
keywords = "Core–shell nanoparticles, Drug delivery systems, Implant imaging, Macrophage depletion, Magnetic targeting, PEGylation, PET imaging",
author = "Andras Polyak and Heidi Harting and Nina Angrisani and Timo Herrmann and Nina Ehlert and Jessica Mei{\ss}ner and Michael Willmann and Silav Al-Bazaz and Ross, {Tobias L.} and Bankstahl, {Jens P.} and Janin Reifenrath",
note = "Funding Information: First of all, the authors would like to remember Prof. Peter Behrens. Who was always full of new ideas and without whom this study would not have been possible. The authors would like to thank the LNQE (Laboratory of Nano- and Quantum Engineering, Leibniz University Hannover) for the use of their TEM equipment. Further the authors would like to thank Song{\"u}l Noyun for nitrogen physisorption measurements and Katharina Nolte for thermogravimetric analysis. The authors would like to thank Anja Sander, Petra Felsch and Daniel Ahrens for their excellent technical support. Additionally, the authors would like to thank Dr. Bastian Welke for 3D printing of the placeholders. Funding Information: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the DFG project “Implant-Directed Magnetic Drug Targeting: Antibiotic therapy of peri-implant infections”, project number: 280642759. ",
year = "2023",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1186/s12951-023-02041-8",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Journal of nanobiotechnology",
issn = "1477-3155",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparation and PET/CT imaging of implant directed 68Ga-labeled magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles

AU - Polyak, Andras

AU - Harting, Heidi

AU - Angrisani, Nina

AU - Herrmann, Timo

AU - Ehlert, Nina

AU - Meißner, Jessica

AU - Willmann, Michael

AU - Al-Bazaz, Silav

AU - Ross, Tobias L.

AU - Bankstahl, Jens P.

AU - Reifenrath, Janin

N1 - Funding Information: First of all, the authors would like to remember Prof. Peter Behrens. Who was always full of new ideas and without whom this study would not have been possible. The authors would like to thank the LNQE (Laboratory of Nano- and Quantum Engineering, Leibniz University Hannover) for the use of their TEM equipment. Further the authors would like to thank Songül Noyun for nitrogen physisorption measurements and Katharina Nolte for thermogravimetric analysis. The authors would like to thank Anja Sander, Petra Felsch and Daniel Ahrens for their excellent technical support. Additionally, the authors would like to thank Dr. Bastian Welke for 3D printing of the placeholders. Funding Information: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the DFG project “Implant-Directed Magnetic Drug Targeting: Antibiotic therapy of peri-implant infections”, project number: 280642759.

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - Background: Implant infections caused by biofilm forming bacteria are a major threat in orthopedic surgery. Delivering antibiotics directly to an implant affected by a bacterial biofilm via superparamagnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles could present a promising approach. Nevertheless, short blood circulation half-life because of rapid interactions of nanoparticles with the host’s immune system hinder them from being clinically used. The aim of this study was to determine the temporal in vivo resolution of magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticle (MNPSNP) distribution and the effect of PEGylation and clodronate application using PET/CT imaging and gamma counting in an implant mouse model. Methods: PEGylated and non-PEGylated MNPSNPs were radiolabeled with gallium-68 (68Ga), implementing the chelator tris(hydroxypyridinone). 36 mice were included in the study, 24 mice received a magnetic implant subcutaneously on the left and a titanium implant on the right hind leg. MNPSNP pharmacokinetics and implant accumulation was analyzed in dependence on PEGylation and additional clodronate application. Subsequently gamma counting was performed for further final analysis. Results: The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of all radiolabeled nanoparticles could clearly be visualized and followed by dynamic PET/CT imaging. Both variants of 68Ga-labeled MNPSNP accumulated mainly in liver and spleen. PEGylation of the nanoparticles already resulted in lower liver uptakes. Combination with macrophage depletion led to a highly significant effect whereas macrophage depletion alone could not reveal significant differences. Although MNPSNP accumulation around implants was low in comparison to the inner organs in PET/CT imaging, gamma counting displayed a significantly higher %I.D./g for the tissue surrounding the magnetic implants compared to the titanium control. Additional PEGylation and/or macrophage depletion revealed no significant differences regarding nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site. Conclusion: Tracking of 68Ga-labeled nanoparticles in a mouse model in the first critical hours post-injection by PET/CT imaging provided a better understanding of MNPSNP distribution, elimination and accumulation. Although PEGylation increases circulation time, nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site was still insufficient for infection treatment and additional efforts are needed to increase local accumulation.

AB - Background: Implant infections caused by biofilm forming bacteria are a major threat in orthopedic surgery. Delivering antibiotics directly to an implant affected by a bacterial biofilm via superparamagnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticles could present a promising approach. Nevertheless, short blood circulation half-life because of rapid interactions of nanoparticles with the host’s immune system hinder them from being clinically used. The aim of this study was to determine the temporal in vivo resolution of magnetic nanoporous silica nanoparticle (MNPSNP) distribution and the effect of PEGylation and clodronate application using PET/CT imaging and gamma counting in an implant mouse model. Methods: PEGylated and non-PEGylated MNPSNPs were radiolabeled with gallium-68 (68Ga), implementing the chelator tris(hydroxypyridinone). 36 mice were included in the study, 24 mice received a magnetic implant subcutaneously on the left and a titanium implant on the right hind leg. MNPSNP pharmacokinetics and implant accumulation was analyzed in dependence on PEGylation and additional clodronate application. Subsequently gamma counting was performed for further final analysis. Results: The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of all radiolabeled nanoparticles could clearly be visualized and followed by dynamic PET/CT imaging. Both variants of 68Ga-labeled MNPSNP accumulated mainly in liver and spleen. PEGylation of the nanoparticles already resulted in lower liver uptakes. Combination with macrophage depletion led to a highly significant effect whereas macrophage depletion alone could not reveal significant differences. Although MNPSNP accumulation around implants was low in comparison to the inner organs in PET/CT imaging, gamma counting displayed a significantly higher %I.D./g for the tissue surrounding the magnetic implants compared to the titanium control. Additional PEGylation and/or macrophage depletion revealed no significant differences regarding nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site. Conclusion: Tracking of 68Ga-labeled nanoparticles in a mouse model in the first critical hours post-injection by PET/CT imaging provided a better understanding of MNPSNP distribution, elimination and accumulation. Although PEGylation increases circulation time, nanoparticle accumulation at the implantation site was still insufficient for infection treatment and additional efforts are needed to increase local accumulation.

KW - Core–shell nanoparticles

KW - Drug delivery systems

KW - Implant imaging

KW - Macrophage depletion

KW - Magnetic targeting

KW - PEGylation

KW - PET imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168258003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12951-023-02041-8

DO - 10.1186/s12951-023-02041-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 37592318

AN - SCOPUS:85168258003

VL - 21

JO - Journal of nanobiotechnology

JF - Journal of nanobiotechnology

SN - 1477-3155

IS - 1

M1 - 270

ER -