Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | A5 |
Journal | JCAP |
Volume | 2020 |
Issue number | 10 |
Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |
Abstract
Planck's residuals of the CMB temperature power spectrum present a curious oscillatory shape that resembles an extra smoothing effect of lensing and is the source of the lensing anomaly. The smoothing effect of lensing to the CMB temperature power spectrum is, to some extent, degenerate with oscillatory modulations of the primordial power spectrum, in particular if the frequency is close to that of the acoustic peaks. We consider the possibility that the lensing anomaly reported by the latest Planck 2018 results may be hinting at an oscillatory modulation generated by a massive scalar field during an alternative scenario to ination or by a sharp feature during ination. We use the full TTTEEE+low E CMB likelihood from Planck to derive constraints on these two types of models. We obtain that in both cases the AL anomaly is mildly reduced to slightly less than 2σ, to be compared with the 2:8σ deviation from AL = 1 in ΛCDM. Although the oscillatory features are not able to satisfactorily ease the lensing anomaly, we find that the oscillatory modulation generated during an alternative scenario alone, i.e. with AL = 1, presents the lowest value of χ2, with Δχ2 = -13 compared to ΛCDM. Furthermore, the Akaike Information Criterion suggests that such an oscillation constitutes an attractive candidate since it has a value ΔAIC = -5 with respect to ΛCDM, comparable to the AL parameter. We also obtain that the equation of state parameter in the alternative scenario is given at 1σ by w = 0:13±0:17. Interestingly, the matter bounce and radiation bounce scenarios are compatible with our results. We discuss how these models of oscillatory features can be tested with future observations.
Keywords
- Alternatives to ination, Gravitational lensing, Ination, Physics of the early universe
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physics and Astronomy(all)
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: JCAP, Vol. 2020, No. 10, A5, 02.10.2020.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Planck residuals anomaly as a fingerprint of alternative scenarios to ination
AU - Domènech, Guillem
AU - Chen, Xingang
AU - Kamionkowski, Marc
AU - Loeb, Abraham
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd and Sissa Medialab.
PY - 2020/10/2
Y1 - 2020/10/2
N2 - Planck's residuals of the CMB temperature power spectrum present a curious oscillatory shape that resembles an extra smoothing effect of lensing and is the source of the lensing anomaly. The smoothing effect of lensing to the CMB temperature power spectrum is, to some extent, degenerate with oscillatory modulations of the primordial power spectrum, in particular if the frequency is close to that of the acoustic peaks. We consider the possibility that the lensing anomaly reported by the latest Planck 2018 results may be hinting at an oscillatory modulation generated by a massive scalar field during an alternative scenario to ination or by a sharp feature during ination. We use the full TTTEEE+low E CMB likelihood from Planck to derive constraints on these two types of models. We obtain that in both cases the AL anomaly is mildly reduced to slightly less than 2σ, to be compared with the 2:8σ deviation from AL = 1 in ΛCDM. Although the oscillatory features are not able to satisfactorily ease the lensing anomaly, we find that the oscillatory modulation generated during an alternative scenario alone, i.e. with AL = 1, presents the lowest value of χ2, with Δχ2 = -13 compared to ΛCDM. Furthermore, the Akaike Information Criterion suggests that such an oscillation constitutes an attractive candidate since it has a value ΔAIC = -5 with respect to ΛCDM, comparable to the AL parameter. We also obtain that the equation of state parameter in the alternative scenario is given at 1σ by w = 0:13±0:17. Interestingly, the matter bounce and radiation bounce scenarios are compatible with our results. We discuss how these models of oscillatory features can be tested with future observations.
AB - Planck's residuals of the CMB temperature power spectrum present a curious oscillatory shape that resembles an extra smoothing effect of lensing and is the source of the lensing anomaly. The smoothing effect of lensing to the CMB temperature power spectrum is, to some extent, degenerate with oscillatory modulations of the primordial power spectrum, in particular if the frequency is close to that of the acoustic peaks. We consider the possibility that the lensing anomaly reported by the latest Planck 2018 results may be hinting at an oscillatory modulation generated by a massive scalar field during an alternative scenario to ination or by a sharp feature during ination. We use the full TTTEEE+low E CMB likelihood from Planck to derive constraints on these two types of models. We obtain that in both cases the AL anomaly is mildly reduced to slightly less than 2σ, to be compared with the 2:8σ deviation from AL = 1 in ΛCDM. Although the oscillatory features are not able to satisfactorily ease the lensing anomaly, we find that the oscillatory modulation generated during an alternative scenario alone, i.e. with AL = 1, presents the lowest value of χ2, with Δχ2 = -13 compared to ΛCDM. Furthermore, the Akaike Information Criterion suggests that such an oscillation constitutes an attractive candidate since it has a value ΔAIC = -5 with respect to ΛCDM, comparable to the AL parameter. We also obtain that the equation of state parameter in the alternative scenario is given at 1σ by w = 0:13±0:17. Interestingly, the matter bounce and radiation bounce scenarios are compatible with our results. We discuss how these models of oscillatory features can be tested with future observations.
KW - Alternatives to ination
KW - Gravitational lensing
KW - Ination
KW - Physics of the early universe
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092907221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/005
DO - 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/005
M3 - Article
VL - 2020
JO - JCAP
JF - JCAP
IS - 10
M1 - A5
ER -