Details
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 699-708 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Engineering in life sciences |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Early online date | 4 Nov 2022 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2022 |
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D-printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also their sterility. The most common method for sterilizing 3D-printed parts is heat steam sterilization—but most commercially available 3D printing materials cannot withstand high temperatures. In this study, a novel heat-resistant polyacrylate material for high-resolution 3D Multijet printing was evaluated for the first time for its resistance to heat steam sterilization and in vitro biocompatibility with mouse fibroblasts (L929), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293E), and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)). Analysis of the growth and viability of L929 cells and the growth of S. cerevisiae confirmed that the extraction media obtained from 3D-printed parts had no negative effect on the aforementioned cell types, while, in contrast, viability and growth of HEK 293E cells were affected. No different effects of the material on the cells were found when comparing heat steam sterilization and disinfection with ethanol (70%, v/v). In principle, the investigated material shows great potential for high-resolution 3D printing of novel cell culture systems that are highly complex in design, customized and easily sterilizable—however, the biocompatibility of the material for other cell types needs to be re-evaluated.
Keywords
- 3D printing, biocompatibility, cell culture, heat steam sterilization, rapid prototyping
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
- Biotechnology
- Environmental Science(all)
- Environmental Engineering
- Chemical Engineering(all)
- Bioengineering
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Engineering in life sciences, Vol. 22, No. 11, 11.2022, p. 699-708.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of a heat-resistant 3D printing material for use in customized cell culture devices
AU - Winkler, Steffen
AU - Meyer, Katharina V.
AU - Heuer, Christopher
AU - Kortmann, Carlotta
AU - Dehne, Michaela
AU - Bahnemann, Janina
N1 - Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the financial support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) via the Emmy Noether Programme (346772917). Furthermore the authors would like to thank the Open Access fund of Leibniz Universität Hannover for the funding of the publication of this article. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D-printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also their sterility. The most common method for sterilizing 3D-printed parts is heat steam sterilization—but most commercially available 3D printing materials cannot withstand high temperatures. In this study, a novel heat-resistant polyacrylate material for high-resolution 3D Multijet printing was evaluated for the first time for its resistance to heat steam sterilization and in vitro biocompatibility with mouse fibroblasts (L929), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293E), and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)). Analysis of the growth and viability of L929 cells and the growth of S. cerevisiae confirmed that the extraction media obtained from 3D-printed parts had no negative effect on the aforementioned cell types, while, in contrast, viability and growth of HEK 293E cells were affected. No different effects of the material on the cells were found when comparing heat steam sterilization and disinfection with ethanol (70%, v/v). In principle, the investigated material shows great potential for high-resolution 3D printing of novel cell culture systems that are highly complex in design, customized and easily sterilizable—however, the biocompatibility of the material for other cell types needs to be re-evaluated.
AB - Additive manufacturing (3D printing) enables the fabrication of highly customized and complex devices and is therefore increasingly used in the field of life sciences and biotechnology. However, the application of 3D-printed parts in these fields requires not only their biocompatibility but also their sterility. The most common method for sterilizing 3D-printed parts is heat steam sterilization—but most commercially available 3D printing materials cannot withstand high temperatures. In this study, a novel heat-resistant polyacrylate material for high-resolution 3D Multijet printing was evaluated for the first time for its resistance to heat steam sterilization and in vitro biocompatibility with mouse fibroblasts (L929), human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293E), and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae)). Analysis of the growth and viability of L929 cells and the growth of S. cerevisiae confirmed that the extraction media obtained from 3D-printed parts had no negative effect on the aforementioned cell types, while, in contrast, viability and growth of HEK 293E cells were affected. No different effects of the material on the cells were found when comparing heat steam sterilization and disinfection with ethanol (70%, v/v). In principle, the investigated material shows great potential for high-resolution 3D printing of novel cell culture systems that are highly complex in design, customized and easily sterilizable—however, the biocompatibility of the material for other cell types needs to be re-evaluated.
KW - 3D printing
KW - biocompatibility
KW - cell culture
KW - heat steam sterilization
KW - rapid prototyping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127436256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/elsc.202100104
DO - 10.1002/elsc.202100104
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127436256
VL - 22
SP - 699
EP - 708
JO - Engineering in life sciences
JF - Engineering in life sciences
SN - 1618-0240
IS - 11
ER -