Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 59 |
Journal | Journal of Geodesy |
Volume | 99 |
Issue number | 7 |
Publication status | Published - 4 Jul 2025 |
Abstract
Keywords
- Closed-loop simulation, Finite element modeling, Future satellite gravimetry missions, Gravity field recovery, Optical accelerometry, Satellite shapes
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geophysics
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Geochemistry and Petrology
- Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
- Computers in Earth Sciences
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 99, No. 7, 59, 04.07.2025.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Deployable Solar Panels on Gravity Field Recovery in GRACE-like Satellites
T2 - a Closed-Loop Simulation Study
AU - Leipner, Andreas
AU - Kupriyanov, Alexey
AU - Reis, Arthur
AU - Knabe, Annike
AU - Schilling, Manuel
AU - Müller, Vitali
AU - Weigelt, Matthias
AU - Müller, Jürgen
AU - List, Meike
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/7/4
Y1 - 2025/7/4
N2 - Future satellite gravimetry missions must meet increasing scientific demands, requiring advanced technologies, e.g., novel inertial sensors, laser ranging systems and potentially electric thrusters to operate in a drag-free regime. Deployable solar panels offer a promising solution by providing sufficient power even under unfavorable illumination conditions, without significantly increasing satellite dimensions or mass. This study evaluates the impact of single and double deployable solar panels on gravity field recovery (GFR) through closed-loop simulations. Five GRACE-like satellite configurations were analyzed, each with distinct finite element models and inertia properties. Detailed orbit simulations included non-spherical static gravity field and impacting non-gravitational force models. Satellites drag coefficients varied from 2.25 to 4.5, depending on configuration. GFR was assessed using degree RMS of spherical harmonic coefficient differences between the recovered and reference fields. GFR results show that discrepancies between the modified and standard configurations are mainly driven by variations of the actuation noise of the modeled optical accelerometer - simplified gravitational reference sensor (SGRS). SGRS performance, in turn, depends on the satellite’s cross-sectional area. Moreover, the convergence of residuals in the spectral domain for simulated orbits with different drag coefficients confirmed the dominant role of SGRS performance in the retrieved gravity field.
AB - Future satellite gravimetry missions must meet increasing scientific demands, requiring advanced technologies, e.g., novel inertial sensors, laser ranging systems and potentially electric thrusters to operate in a drag-free regime. Deployable solar panels offer a promising solution by providing sufficient power even under unfavorable illumination conditions, without significantly increasing satellite dimensions or mass. This study evaluates the impact of single and double deployable solar panels on gravity field recovery (GFR) through closed-loop simulations. Five GRACE-like satellite configurations were analyzed, each with distinct finite element models and inertia properties. Detailed orbit simulations included non-spherical static gravity field and impacting non-gravitational force models. Satellites drag coefficients varied from 2.25 to 4.5, depending on configuration. GFR was assessed using degree RMS of spherical harmonic coefficient differences between the recovered and reference fields. GFR results show that discrepancies between the modified and standard configurations are mainly driven by variations of the actuation noise of the modeled optical accelerometer - simplified gravitational reference sensor (SGRS). SGRS performance, in turn, depends on the satellite’s cross-sectional area. Moreover, the convergence of residuals in the spectral domain for simulated orbits with different drag coefficients confirmed the dominant role of SGRS performance in the retrieved gravity field.
KW - Closed-loop simulation
KW - Finite element modeling
KW - Future satellite gravimetry missions
KW - Gravity field recovery
KW - Optical accelerometry
KW - Satellite shapes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105010068308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00190-025-01983-1
DO - 10.1007/s00190-025-01983-1
M3 - Article
VL - 99
JO - Journal of Geodesy
JF - Journal of Geodesy
SN - 0949-7714
IS - 7
M1 - 59
ER -