HapticHead: 3D Guidance and Target Acquisition through a Vibrotactile Grid

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Oliver Beren Kaul
  • Michael Rohs
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCHI EA '16
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Pages2533-2539
Number of pages7
ISBN (electronic)9781450340823
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2016
Event34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2016 - San Jose, United States
Duration: 7 May 201612 May 2016

Abstract

Current generation virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) usually include no or only a single vibration motor for haptic feedback and do not use it for guidance. We present HapticHead, a system utilizing 20 vibration motors distributed in three concentric ellipses around the head to give intuitive haptic guidance hints and to increase immersion for VR and AR applications. Our user study indicates that HapticHead is both faster (mean=3.7s, SD=2.3s vs. mean=7.8s, SD=5.0s) and more precise (92.7% vs. 44.9% hit rate) than auditory feedback for the purpose of finding virtual objects in 3D space around the user. The baseline of visual feedback is - as expected - more precise (99.9% hit rate) and faster (mean=1.5s, SD=0.6s) in comparison but there are many applications in which visual feedback is not desirable or available due to lighting conditions, visual overload, or visual impairments.

Keywords

    Augmented reality, Games, Guidance, Haptic feedback, Immersion, Navigation, Vibrotactile, Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

HapticHead: 3D Guidance and Target Acquisition through a Vibrotactile Grid. / Kaul, Oliver Beren; Rohs, Michael.
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2016. p. 2533-2539.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer review

Kaul, OB & Rohs, M 2016, HapticHead: 3D Guidance and Target Acquisition through a Vibrotactile Grid. in CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), pp. 2533-2539, 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2016, San Jose, United States, 7 May 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892355
Kaul, O. B., & Rohs, M. (2016). HapticHead: 3D Guidance and Target Acquisition through a Vibrotactile Grid. In CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2533-2539). Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892355
Kaul OB, Rohs M. HapticHead: 3D Guidance and Target Acquisition through a Vibrotactile Grid. In CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). 2016. p. 2533-2539 doi: 10.1145/2851581.2892355
Kaul, Oliver Beren ; Rohs, Michael. / HapticHead : 3D Guidance and Target Acquisition through a Vibrotactile Grid. CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2016. pp. 2533-2539
Download
@inproceedings{cfa5738d1dfb486e8bc69646e0c37fdc,
title = "HapticHead: 3D Guidance and Target Acquisition through a Vibrotactile Grid",
abstract = "Current generation virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) usually include no or only a single vibration motor for haptic feedback and do not use it for guidance. We present HapticHead, a system utilizing 20 vibration motors distributed in three concentric ellipses around the head to give intuitive haptic guidance hints and to increase immersion for VR and AR applications. Our user study indicates that HapticHead is both faster (mean=3.7s, SD=2.3s vs. mean=7.8s, SD=5.0s) and more precise (92.7% vs. 44.9% hit rate) than auditory feedback for the purpose of finding virtual objects in 3D space around the user. The baseline of visual feedback is - as expected - more precise (99.9% hit rate) and faster (mean=1.5s, SD=0.6s) in comparison but there are many applications in which visual feedback is not desirable or available due to lighting conditions, visual overload, or visual impairments.",
keywords = "Augmented reality, Games, Guidance, Haptic feedback, Immersion, Navigation, Vibrotactile, Virtual reality",
author = "Kaul, {Oliver Beren} and Michael Rohs",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Authors. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2016 ; Conference date: 07-05-2016 Through 12-05-2016",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1145/2851581.2892355",
language = "English",
pages = "2533--2539",
booktitle = "CHI EA '16",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
address = "United States",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - HapticHead

T2 - 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2016

AU - Kaul, Oliver Beren

AU - Rohs, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Authors. Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/5/7

Y1 - 2016/5/7

N2 - Current generation virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) usually include no or only a single vibration motor for haptic feedback and do not use it for guidance. We present HapticHead, a system utilizing 20 vibration motors distributed in three concentric ellipses around the head to give intuitive haptic guidance hints and to increase immersion for VR and AR applications. Our user study indicates that HapticHead is both faster (mean=3.7s, SD=2.3s vs. mean=7.8s, SD=5.0s) and more precise (92.7% vs. 44.9% hit rate) than auditory feedback for the purpose of finding virtual objects in 3D space around the user. The baseline of visual feedback is - as expected - more precise (99.9% hit rate) and faster (mean=1.5s, SD=0.6s) in comparison but there are many applications in which visual feedback is not desirable or available due to lighting conditions, visual overload, or visual impairments.

AB - Current generation virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) usually include no or only a single vibration motor for haptic feedback and do not use it for guidance. We present HapticHead, a system utilizing 20 vibration motors distributed in three concentric ellipses around the head to give intuitive haptic guidance hints and to increase immersion for VR and AR applications. Our user study indicates that HapticHead is both faster (mean=3.7s, SD=2.3s vs. mean=7.8s, SD=5.0s) and more precise (92.7% vs. 44.9% hit rate) than auditory feedback for the purpose of finding virtual objects in 3D space around the user. The baseline of visual feedback is - as expected - more precise (99.9% hit rate) and faster (mean=1.5s, SD=0.6s) in comparison but there are many applications in which visual feedback is not desirable or available due to lighting conditions, visual overload, or visual impairments.

KW - Augmented reality

KW - Games

KW - Guidance

KW - Haptic feedback

KW - Immersion

KW - Navigation

KW - Vibrotactile

KW - Virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978838977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/2851581.2892355

DO - 10.1145/2851581.2892355

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84978838977

SP - 2533

EP - 2539

BT - CHI EA '16

PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Y2 - 7 May 2016 through 12 May 2016

ER -