Finite Difference Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Cyclic Thermal Heating in the Fused Filament Fabrication Process

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e1064-e1072
Journal3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date18 Jun 2024
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular additive manufacturing (AM) processes due to its simplicity and low initial and maintenance costs. However, good printing results such as high dimensionality, avoidance of cooling cracks, and warping are directly related to heat control in the process and require precise settings of printing parameters. Therefore, accurate prediction and understanding of temperature peaks and cooling behavior in a local area and in a larger part are important in FFF, as in other AM processes. To analyze the temperature peaks and cooling behavior, we simulated the heat distribution, including convective heat transfer, in a cuboid sample. The model uses the finite difference method (FDM), which is advantageous for parallel computing on graphics processing units and makes temperature simulations also of larger parts feasible. After the verification process, we validate the simulation with an in situ measurement during FFF printing. We conclude the process simulation with a parameter study in which we vary the function of the heat transfer coefficient and part size. For smaller parts, we found that the print bed temperature is crucial for the temperature gradient. The approximations of the heat transfer process play only a secondary role. For larger components, the opposite effect can be observed. The description of heat transfer plays a decisive role for the heat distribution in the component, whereas the bed temperature determines the temperature distribution only in the immediate vicinity of the bed. The developed FFF process model thus provides a good basis for further investigations and can be easily extended by additional effects or transferred to other AM processes.

Keywords

    additive manufacturing, experimental investigation, finite difference method, fused filament fabrication, heat transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Finite Difference Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Cyclic Thermal Heating in the Fused Filament Fabrication Process. / Luberto, Luca; Böß, Volker; de Payrebrune, Kristin M.
In: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 11, No. 3, 06.2024, p. e1064-e1072.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{20c2be74a40b47ff9b83d4fefad132d6,
title = "Finite Difference Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Cyclic Thermal Heating in the Fused Filament Fabrication Process",
abstract = "Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular additive manufacturing (AM) processes due to its simplicity and low initial and maintenance costs. However, good printing results such as high dimensionality, avoidance of cooling cracks, and warping are directly related to heat control in the process and require precise settings of printing parameters. Therefore, accurate prediction and understanding of temperature peaks and cooling behavior in a local area and in a larger part are important in FFF, as in other AM processes. To analyze the temperature peaks and cooling behavior, we simulated the heat distribution, including convective heat transfer, in a cuboid sample. The model uses the finite difference method (FDM), which is advantageous for parallel computing on graphics processing units and makes temperature simulations also of larger parts feasible. After the verification process, we validate the simulation with an in situ measurement during FFF printing. We conclude the process simulation with a parameter study in which we vary the function of the heat transfer coefficient and part size. For smaller parts, we found that the print bed temperature is crucial for the temperature gradient. The approximations of the heat transfer process play only a secondary role. For larger components, the opposite effect can be observed. The description of heat transfer plays a decisive role for the heat distribution in the component, whereas the bed temperature determines the temperature distribution only in the immediate vicinity of the bed. The developed FFF process model thus provides a good basis for further investigations and can be easily extended by additional effects or transferred to other AM processes.",
keywords = "additive manufacturing, experimental investigation, finite difference method, fused filament fabrication, heat transfer",
author = "Luca Luberto and Volker B{\"o}{\ss} and {de Payrebrune}, {Kristin M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1089/3dp.2022.0282",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "e1064--e1072",
journal = "3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing",
issn = "2329-7662",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finite Difference Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Cyclic Thermal Heating in the Fused Filament Fabrication Process

AU - Luberto, Luca

AU - Böß, Volker

AU - de Payrebrune, Kristin M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

PY - 2024/6

Y1 - 2024/6

N2 - Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular additive manufacturing (AM) processes due to its simplicity and low initial and maintenance costs. However, good printing results such as high dimensionality, avoidance of cooling cracks, and warping are directly related to heat control in the process and require precise settings of printing parameters. Therefore, accurate prediction and understanding of temperature peaks and cooling behavior in a local area and in a larger part are important in FFF, as in other AM processes. To analyze the temperature peaks and cooling behavior, we simulated the heat distribution, including convective heat transfer, in a cuboid sample. The model uses the finite difference method (FDM), which is advantageous for parallel computing on graphics processing units and makes temperature simulations also of larger parts feasible. After the verification process, we validate the simulation with an in situ measurement during FFF printing. We conclude the process simulation with a parameter study in which we vary the function of the heat transfer coefficient and part size. For smaller parts, we found that the print bed temperature is crucial for the temperature gradient. The approximations of the heat transfer process play only a secondary role. For larger components, the opposite effect can be observed. The description of heat transfer plays a decisive role for the heat distribution in the component, whereas the bed temperature determines the temperature distribution only in the immediate vicinity of the bed. The developed FFF process model thus provides a good basis for further investigations and can be easily extended by additional effects or transferred to other AM processes.

AB - Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular additive manufacturing (AM) processes due to its simplicity and low initial and maintenance costs. However, good printing results such as high dimensionality, avoidance of cooling cracks, and warping are directly related to heat control in the process and require precise settings of printing parameters. Therefore, accurate prediction and understanding of temperature peaks and cooling behavior in a local area and in a larger part are important in FFF, as in other AM processes. To analyze the temperature peaks and cooling behavior, we simulated the heat distribution, including convective heat transfer, in a cuboid sample. The model uses the finite difference method (FDM), which is advantageous for parallel computing on graphics processing units and makes temperature simulations also of larger parts feasible. After the verification process, we validate the simulation with an in situ measurement during FFF printing. We conclude the process simulation with a parameter study in which we vary the function of the heat transfer coefficient and part size. For smaller parts, we found that the print bed temperature is crucial for the temperature gradient. The approximations of the heat transfer process play only a secondary role. For larger components, the opposite effect can be observed. The description of heat transfer plays a decisive role for the heat distribution in the component, whereas the bed temperature determines the temperature distribution only in the immediate vicinity of the bed. The developed FFF process model thus provides a good basis for further investigations and can be easily extended by additional effects or transferred to other AM processes.

KW - additive manufacturing

KW - experimental investigation

KW - finite difference method

KW - fused filament fabrication

KW - heat transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85171249156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/3dp.2022.0282

DO - 10.1089/3dp.2022.0282

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85171249156

VL - 11

SP - e1064-e1072

JO - 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing

JF - 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing

SN - 2329-7662

IS - 3

ER -

By the same author(s)