Finite deformation post‐buckling analysis involving inelasticity and contact constraints

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • University of California at Berkeley
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)779-800
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Volume23
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 1986
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the numerical solution of large deflection structural problems involving finite strains, subject to contact constraints and unilateral boundary conditions, and exhibiting inelastic constitutive response. First, a three‐dimensional finite strain beam model is summarized, and its numerical implementation in the two‐dimensional case is discussed. Next, a penalty formulation for the solution of contact problems is presented and the correct expression for consistent tangent matrix is developed. Finally, basic strategies for tracing limit points are reviewed and a modification of the arc‐length method is proposed. The good performance of the procedures discussed is illustrated by means of numerical examples.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Finite deformation post‐buckling analysis involving inelasticity and contact constraints. / Simo, J. C.; Wriggers, Peter; Schweizerhof, K. H. et al.
In: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 5, 05.1986, p. 779-800.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Download
@article{6b1ff248dff2477e8b3c9c59f071f698,
title = "Finite deformation post‐buckling analysis involving inelasticity and contact constraints",
abstract = "This paper is concerned with the numerical solution of large deflection structural problems involving finite strains, subject to contact constraints and unilateral boundary conditions, and exhibiting inelastic constitutive response. First, a three‐dimensional finite strain beam model is summarized, and its numerical implementation in the two‐dimensional case is discussed. Next, a penalty formulation for the solution of contact problems is presented and the correct expression for consistent tangent matrix is developed. Finally, basic strategies for tracing limit points are reviewed and a modification of the arc‐length method is proposed. The good performance of the procedures discussed is illustrated by means of numerical examples.",
author = "Simo, {J. C.} and Peter Wriggers and Schweizerhof, {K. H.} and Taylor, {R. L.}",
year = "1986",
month = may,
doi = "10.1002/nme.1620230504",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "779--800",
journal = "International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering",
issn = "0029-5981",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finite deformation post‐buckling analysis involving inelasticity and contact constraints

AU - Simo, J. C.

AU - Wriggers, Peter

AU - Schweizerhof, K. H.

AU - Taylor, R. L.

PY - 1986/5

Y1 - 1986/5

N2 - This paper is concerned with the numerical solution of large deflection structural problems involving finite strains, subject to contact constraints and unilateral boundary conditions, and exhibiting inelastic constitutive response. First, a three‐dimensional finite strain beam model is summarized, and its numerical implementation in the two‐dimensional case is discussed. Next, a penalty formulation for the solution of contact problems is presented and the correct expression for consistent tangent matrix is developed. Finally, basic strategies for tracing limit points are reviewed and a modification of the arc‐length method is proposed. The good performance of the procedures discussed is illustrated by means of numerical examples.

AB - This paper is concerned with the numerical solution of large deflection structural problems involving finite strains, subject to contact constraints and unilateral boundary conditions, and exhibiting inelastic constitutive response. First, a three‐dimensional finite strain beam model is summarized, and its numerical implementation in the two‐dimensional case is discussed. Next, a penalty formulation for the solution of contact problems is presented and the correct expression for consistent tangent matrix is developed. Finally, basic strategies for tracing limit points are reviewed and a modification of the arc‐length method is proposed. The good performance of the procedures discussed is illustrated by means of numerical examples.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022716270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nme.1620230504

DO - 10.1002/nme.1620230504

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022716270

VL - 23

SP - 779

EP - 800

JO - International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

JF - International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

SN - 0029-5981

IS - 5

ER -

By the same author(s)