Details
| Translated title of the contribution | Ökonomisches versus gesellschaftliches Wertesystem im Land-und Immobilienmanagement: zwei Seiten der gleichen Medaille? |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 381-394 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Raumforschung und Raumordnung |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 25 Sept 2018 |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Oct 2018 |
Abstract
This article reviews and analyses how and why land-management practice draws on two contrasting value systems: economic and social. Land managers are at the crossroads of different value systems, which both overlap and contrast. The aim of this article is to provide an understanding of which aspects are crucial in each of the value systems, and to provide a basis for how and where the value systems can be connected and where they are contradictory. This is undertaken using an exploratory qualitative and descriptive comparison, which contrasts the epistemic logics of the value systems, the manner in which each system makes use of different scales, and the way in which decisions are made with each value system. Such an understanding is crucial to improve coherence in designing and predicting the future effects of land-management interventions. Currently, practitioners tend to design interventions based on single value systems, rather than on combining or integrating value systems. The discursive comparison provides the initial steps towards a more coherent understanding of the common ground and the missing links in value logics applied in land management. These results are relevant to provide better descriptions and predictions of the effects of land-use interventions and develop improved transdisciplinary models to predict changes and development in the utilization of land or property.
Keywords
- Contrasting value systems, Economic value, Intangible values, Land management, Market value, Societal value, Tangible values, Value capture
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Social Sciences(all)
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Social Sciences(all)
- Urban Studies
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Vol. 76, No. 5, 31.10.2018, p. 381-394.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic Versus Social Values in Land and Property Management: TwoSides of the Same Coin?
AU - de Vries, Walter Timo
AU - Voß, Winrich
PY - 2018/10/31
Y1 - 2018/10/31
N2 - This article reviews and analyses how and why land-management practice draws on two contrasting value systems: economic and social. Land managers are at the crossroads of different value systems, which both overlap and contrast. The aim of this article is to provide an understanding of which aspects are crucial in each of the value systems, and to provide a basis for how and where the value systems can be connected and where they are contradictory. This is undertaken using an exploratory qualitative and descriptive comparison, which contrasts the epistemic logics of the value systems, the manner in which each system makes use of different scales, and the way in which decisions are made with each value system. Such an understanding is crucial to improve coherence in designing and predicting the future effects of land-management interventions. Currently, practitioners tend to design interventions based on single value systems, rather than on combining or integrating value systems. The discursive comparison provides the initial steps towards a more coherent understanding of the common ground and the missing links in value logics applied in land management. These results are relevant to provide better descriptions and predictions of the effects of land-use interventions and develop improved transdisciplinary models to predict changes and development in the utilization of land or property.
AB - This article reviews and analyses how and why land-management practice draws on two contrasting value systems: economic and social. Land managers are at the crossroads of different value systems, which both overlap and contrast. The aim of this article is to provide an understanding of which aspects are crucial in each of the value systems, and to provide a basis for how and where the value systems can be connected and where they are contradictory. This is undertaken using an exploratory qualitative and descriptive comparison, which contrasts the epistemic logics of the value systems, the manner in which each system makes use of different scales, and the way in which decisions are made with each value system. Such an understanding is crucial to improve coherence in designing and predicting the future effects of land-management interventions. Currently, practitioners tend to design interventions based on single value systems, rather than on combining or integrating value systems. The discursive comparison provides the initial steps towards a more coherent understanding of the common ground and the missing links in value logics applied in land management. These results are relevant to provide better descriptions and predictions of the effects of land-use interventions and develop improved transdisciplinary models to predict changes and development in the utilization of land or property.
KW - Contrasting value systems
KW - Economic value
KW - Intangible values
KW - Land management
KW - Market value
KW - Societal value
KW - Tangible values
KW - Value capture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059126664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13147-018-0557-9
DO - 10.1007/s13147-018-0557-9
M3 - Article
VL - 76
SP - 381
EP - 394
JO - Raumforschung und Raumordnung
JF - Raumforschung und Raumordnung
SN - 0034-0111
IS - 5
ER -