Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | 54rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,CDC 2015 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
Pages | 4946-4951 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (electronic) | 9781479978861 |
Publication status | Published - 8 Feb 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2015 - Osaka, Japan Duration: 15 Dec 2015 → 18 Dec 2015 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control |
---|---|
Volume | 54rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,CDC 2015 |
ISSN (Print) | 0743-1546 |
ISSN (electronic) | 2576-2370 |
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze economic model predictive control schemes without terminal constraints, where the optimal operating regime is not steady-state operation, but periodic behavior. We first show by means of two counterexamples, that a classical 1-step receding horizon control scheme does not necessarily result in an optimal closed-loop performance. Instead, a multi-step MPC scheme may be needed in order to establish near optimal performance of the closed-loop system. This behavior is analyzed in detail, and we derive checkable dissipativity-like conditions in order to obtain closed-loop performance guarantees.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Engineering(all)
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Mathematics(all)
- Modelling and Simulation
- Mathematics(all)
- Control and Optimization
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
54rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,CDC 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2015. p. 4946-4951 7402992 (Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Vol. 54rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,CDC 2015).
Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Research › peer review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Economic model predictive control without terminal constraints
T2 - 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2015
AU - Muller, Matthias A.
AU - Grune, Lars
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2015 IEEE.
PY - 2015/2/8
Y1 - 2015/2/8
N2 - In this paper, we analyze economic model predictive control schemes without terminal constraints, where the optimal operating regime is not steady-state operation, but periodic behavior. We first show by means of two counterexamples, that a classical 1-step receding horizon control scheme does not necessarily result in an optimal closed-loop performance. Instead, a multi-step MPC scheme may be needed in order to establish near optimal performance of the closed-loop system. This behavior is analyzed in detail, and we derive checkable dissipativity-like conditions in order to obtain closed-loop performance guarantees.
AB - In this paper, we analyze economic model predictive control schemes without terminal constraints, where the optimal operating regime is not steady-state operation, but periodic behavior. We first show by means of two counterexamples, that a classical 1-step receding horizon control scheme does not necessarily result in an optimal closed-loop performance. Instead, a multi-step MPC scheme may be needed in order to establish near optimal performance of the closed-loop system. This behavior is analyzed in detail, and we derive checkable dissipativity-like conditions in order to obtain closed-loop performance guarantees.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962038051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CDC.2015.7402992
DO - 10.1109/CDC.2015.7402992
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84962038051
T3 - Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
SP - 4946
EP - 4951
BT - 54rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,CDC 2015
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 15 December 2015 through 18 December 2015
ER -