Comparison of the thermal properties of four wettable and four water-repellent soils

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Iowa State University
  • Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1675-1679
Number of pages5
JournalSoil Science Society of America Journal
Volume65
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Abstract

Water repellency is a widespread phenomenon, but its effect on most physical soil properties is still unknown. The present study deals with the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of wettable and water-repellent (hydrophobic) sandy and silty soils. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity were determined by heat pulse measurements. Heat pulse measurements were made on samples of eight soils (four pairs of wettable soil and the corresponding water-repellent counterpart). Water repellency either was caused by soil organic matter showing natural repellency or induced by chemical treatment of wettable soils with dichlorodimethylsilane (C2H6SiCl2). Thermal conductivity was also predicted with the models of de Vries and of Campbell. Almost all measured conductivities were larger than those predicted by the de Vries model. For the wettable soils, most of the conductivities in the soil water saturation range between 0.20 and 0.75 differed by more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1. The hydrophobic soils however, showed only in the range around a saturation degree of 0.20 to 0.50 values that deviated more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1 from the predictions. The Campbell model underestimated the conductivity at low saturation for wettable and hydrophobic soil, but overestimated it at high saturation for the wettable soil. Thermal conductivity for either dry or water-saturated soil was predicted satisfactorily by both models. It was found further that soil wettability had no systematic impact on heat capacity. It is concluded that soil thermal conductivity decreased as soil hydrophobicity increased, whereas the volumetric heat capacity was not affected by soil wettability.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Comparison of the thermal properties of four wettable and four water-repellent soils. / Bachmann, J.; Horton, R.; Ren, T. et al.
In: Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 65, No. 6, 2001, p. 1675-1679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Bachmann J, Horton R, Ren T, Van Der Ploeg RR. Comparison of the thermal properties of four wettable and four water-repellent soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2001;65(6):1675-1679. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2001.1675
Download
@article{e1d577b25706454cbdb5a68b6fdf1f59,
title = "Comparison of the thermal properties of four wettable and four water-repellent soils",
abstract = "Water repellency is a widespread phenomenon, but its effect on most physical soil properties is still unknown. The present study deals with the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of wettable and water-repellent (hydrophobic) sandy and silty soils. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity were determined by heat pulse measurements. Heat pulse measurements were made on samples of eight soils (four pairs of wettable soil and the corresponding water-repellent counterpart). Water repellency either was caused by soil organic matter showing natural repellency or induced by chemical treatment of wettable soils with dichlorodimethylsilane (C2H6SiCl2). Thermal conductivity was also predicted with the models of de Vries and of Campbell. Almost all measured conductivities were larger than those predicted by the de Vries model. For the wettable soils, most of the conductivities in the soil water saturation range between 0.20 and 0.75 differed by more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1. The hydrophobic soils however, showed only in the range around a saturation degree of 0.20 to 0.50 values that deviated more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1 from the predictions. The Campbell model underestimated the conductivity at low saturation for wettable and hydrophobic soil, but overestimated it at high saturation for the wettable soil. Thermal conductivity for either dry or water-saturated soil was predicted satisfactorily by both models. It was found further that soil wettability had no systematic impact on heat capacity. It is concluded that soil thermal conductivity decreased as soil hydrophobicity increased, whereas the volumetric heat capacity was not affected by soil wettability.",
author = "J. Bachmann and R. Horton and T. Ren and {Van Der Ploeg}, {R. R.}",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.2136/sssaj2001.1675",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1675--1679",
journal = "Soil Science Society of America Journal",
issn = "0361-5995",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the thermal properties of four wettable and four water-repellent soils

AU - Bachmann, J.

AU - Horton, R.

AU - Ren, T.

AU - Van Der Ploeg, R. R.

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Water repellency is a widespread phenomenon, but its effect on most physical soil properties is still unknown. The present study deals with the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of wettable and water-repellent (hydrophobic) sandy and silty soils. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity were determined by heat pulse measurements. Heat pulse measurements were made on samples of eight soils (four pairs of wettable soil and the corresponding water-repellent counterpart). Water repellency either was caused by soil organic matter showing natural repellency or induced by chemical treatment of wettable soils with dichlorodimethylsilane (C2H6SiCl2). Thermal conductivity was also predicted with the models of de Vries and of Campbell. Almost all measured conductivities were larger than those predicted by the de Vries model. For the wettable soils, most of the conductivities in the soil water saturation range between 0.20 and 0.75 differed by more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1. The hydrophobic soils however, showed only in the range around a saturation degree of 0.20 to 0.50 values that deviated more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1 from the predictions. The Campbell model underestimated the conductivity at low saturation for wettable and hydrophobic soil, but overestimated it at high saturation for the wettable soil. Thermal conductivity for either dry or water-saturated soil was predicted satisfactorily by both models. It was found further that soil wettability had no systematic impact on heat capacity. It is concluded that soil thermal conductivity decreased as soil hydrophobicity increased, whereas the volumetric heat capacity was not affected by soil wettability.

AB - Water repellency is a widespread phenomenon, but its effect on most physical soil properties is still unknown. The present study deals with the thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity of wettable and water-repellent (hydrophobic) sandy and silty soils. Thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity were determined by heat pulse measurements. Heat pulse measurements were made on samples of eight soils (four pairs of wettable soil and the corresponding water-repellent counterpart). Water repellency either was caused by soil organic matter showing natural repellency or induced by chemical treatment of wettable soils with dichlorodimethylsilane (C2H6SiCl2). Thermal conductivity was also predicted with the models of de Vries and of Campbell. Almost all measured conductivities were larger than those predicted by the de Vries model. For the wettable soils, most of the conductivities in the soil water saturation range between 0.20 and 0.75 differed by more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1. The hydrophobic soils however, showed only in the range around a saturation degree of 0.20 to 0.50 values that deviated more than 0.5 W m-1 K-1 from the predictions. The Campbell model underestimated the conductivity at low saturation for wettable and hydrophobic soil, but overestimated it at high saturation for the wettable soil. Thermal conductivity for either dry or water-saturated soil was predicted satisfactorily by both models. It was found further that soil wettability had no systematic impact on heat capacity. It is concluded that soil thermal conductivity decreased as soil hydrophobicity increased, whereas the volumetric heat capacity was not affected by soil wettability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035665893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2136/sssaj2001.1675

DO - 10.2136/sssaj2001.1675

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035665893

VL - 65

SP - 1675

EP - 1679

JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal

JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal

SN - 0361-5995

IS - 6

ER -

By the same author(s)