Companies preferences and willingness to pay for ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Cheng Chen
  • Bettina Matzdorf
  • Marlen Davis

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number101653
Number of pages10
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume69
Early online date5 Sept 2024
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Abstract

While greater business financing is important to halt the loss of biodiversity and environmental degradation, only a limited number of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes receive voluntary financing from companies. Recently, pilot private ecosystem marketplaces have emerged to function as an intermediary between suppliers and private buyers for ecosystem services projects with varying levels of validation, verification, additionality and permanence. However, business interests have not yet been the topic of much empirical research. To answer our research question on the preferences of business sector towards the ecosystem services credits that support the provision of environmental public goods, we collected survey data from 618 German companies through an online survey in 2019. We analysed characteristics of companies, perceived opportunities and threats, types of ecosystem services credits and the willingness to spend as factors to understand companies’ preferences. We showed that the ecosystem services credits concept appeals to a small proportion of companies. We found that companies have so far felt little pressure from assumed expectation. For example, there is no significant effect on companies’ interest in nature conservation steering from the link between company and nature. A nationwide internet platform, along with scientifically-based predictions of project impacts, was particularly appreciated by companies as it facilitated easier engagement by revealing regional project opportunities. Climate protection, water quality, and biodiversity emerged as the most appealing ecosystem services categories for companies. Additionally, companies expressed a preference for bundling relevant ecosystem services options. Our study highlights the significance of considering companies’ local preferences. Furthermore, we observed that the majority of companies demonstrated a willingness to make low threshold and flexible contributions. By presenting descriptive evidences based on primary data from a large number of companies, this research addresses a previously existing gap of business interests in financing ecosystem services provision via new innovative markets.

Keywords

    Biodiversity, Business, Certification, Corporate, Payments for ecosystem services, Private sector

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Companies preferences and willingness to pay for ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace. / Chen, Cheng; Matzdorf, Bettina; Davis, Marlen.
In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 69, 101653, 10.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Chen C, Matzdorf B, Davis M. Companies preferences and willingness to pay for ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace. Ecosystem Services. 2024 Oct;69:101653. Epub 2024 Sept 5. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101653
Download
@article{e6ef8a47013b412abbc369fc0bb513db,
title = "Companies preferences and willingness to pay for ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace",
abstract = "While greater business financing is important to halt the loss of biodiversity and environmental degradation, only a limited number of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes receive voluntary financing from companies. Recently, pilot private ecosystem marketplaces have emerged to function as an intermediary between suppliers and private buyers for ecosystem services projects with varying levels of validation, verification, additionality and permanence. However, business interests have not yet been the topic of much empirical research. To answer our research question on the preferences of business sector towards the ecosystem services credits that support the provision of environmental public goods, we collected survey data from 618 German companies through an online survey in 2019. We analysed characteristics of companies, perceived opportunities and threats, types of ecosystem services credits and the willingness to spend as factors to understand companies{\textquoteright} preferences. We showed that the ecosystem services credits concept appeals to a small proportion of companies. We found that companies have so far felt little pressure from assumed expectation. For example, there is no significant effect on companies{\textquoteright} interest in nature conservation steering from the link between company and nature. A nationwide internet platform, along with scientifically-based predictions of project impacts, was particularly appreciated by companies as it facilitated easier engagement by revealing regional project opportunities. Climate protection, water quality, and biodiversity emerged as the most appealing ecosystem services categories for companies. Additionally, companies expressed a preference for bundling relevant ecosystem services options. Our study highlights the significance of considering companies{\textquoteright} local preferences. Furthermore, we observed that the majority of companies demonstrated a willingness to make low threshold and flexible contributions. By presenting descriptive evidences based on primary data from a large number of companies, this research addresses a previously existing gap of business interests in financing ecosystem services provision via new innovative markets.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Business, Certification, Corporate, Payments for ecosystem services, Private sector",
author = "Cheng Chen and Bettina Matzdorf and Marlen Davis",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024",
year = "2024",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101653",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Companies preferences and willingness to pay for ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace

AU - Chen, Cheng

AU - Matzdorf, Bettina

AU - Davis, Marlen

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024

PY - 2024/10

Y1 - 2024/10

N2 - While greater business financing is important to halt the loss of biodiversity and environmental degradation, only a limited number of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes receive voluntary financing from companies. Recently, pilot private ecosystem marketplaces have emerged to function as an intermediary between suppliers and private buyers for ecosystem services projects with varying levels of validation, verification, additionality and permanence. However, business interests have not yet been the topic of much empirical research. To answer our research question on the preferences of business sector towards the ecosystem services credits that support the provision of environmental public goods, we collected survey data from 618 German companies through an online survey in 2019. We analysed characteristics of companies, perceived opportunities and threats, types of ecosystem services credits and the willingness to spend as factors to understand companies’ preferences. We showed that the ecosystem services credits concept appeals to a small proportion of companies. We found that companies have so far felt little pressure from assumed expectation. For example, there is no significant effect on companies’ interest in nature conservation steering from the link between company and nature. A nationwide internet platform, along with scientifically-based predictions of project impacts, was particularly appreciated by companies as it facilitated easier engagement by revealing regional project opportunities. Climate protection, water quality, and biodiversity emerged as the most appealing ecosystem services categories for companies. Additionally, companies expressed a preference for bundling relevant ecosystem services options. Our study highlights the significance of considering companies’ local preferences. Furthermore, we observed that the majority of companies demonstrated a willingness to make low threshold and flexible contributions. By presenting descriptive evidences based on primary data from a large number of companies, this research addresses a previously existing gap of business interests in financing ecosystem services provision via new innovative markets.

AB - While greater business financing is important to halt the loss of biodiversity and environmental degradation, only a limited number of payments for ecosystem services (PES) schemes receive voluntary financing from companies. Recently, pilot private ecosystem marketplaces have emerged to function as an intermediary between suppliers and private buyers for ecosystem services projects with varying levels of validation, verification, additionality and permanence. However, business interests have not yet been the topic of much empirical research. To answer our research question on the preferences of business sector towards the ecosystem services credits that support the provision of environmental public goods, we collected survey data from 618 German companies through an online survey in 2019. We analysed characteristics of companies, perceived opportunities and threats, types of ecosystem services credits and the willingness to spend as factors to understand companies’ preferences. We showed that the ecosystem services credits concept appeals to a small proportion of companies. We found that companies have so far felt little pressure from assumed expectation. For example, there is no significant effect on companies’ interest in nature conservation steering from the link between company and nature. A nationwide internet platform, along with scientifically-based predictions of project impacts, was particularly appreciated by companies as it facilitated easier engagement by revealing regional project opportunities. Climate protection, water quality, and biodiversity emerged as the most appealing ecosystem services categories for companies. Additionally, companies expressed a preference for bundling relevant ecosystem services options. Our study highlights the significance of considering companies’ local preferences. Furthermore, we observed that the majority of companies demonstrated a willingness to make low threshold and flexible contributions. By presenting descriptive evidences based on primary data from a large number of companies, this research addresses a previously existing gap of business interests in financing ecosystem services provision via new innovative markets.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Business

KW - Certification

KW - Corporate

KW - Payments for ecosystem services

KW - Private sector

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203123112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101653

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101653

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85203123112

VL - 69

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

M1 - 101653

ER -