Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Peng Fei Shan
  • Ming Jian Cao
  • Dong Mei Tang
  • Zheng Jie Qiu
  • Marina Lazarov
  • Da Chuan Wang
  • Ingo Horn
  • Stefan Weyer

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • CAS - Institute of Geology and Geophysics
  • University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS)
  • Curtin University
  • China University of Geosciences

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-143
Number of pages19
JournalGeochimica et cosmochimica acta
Volume399
Early online date27 Apr 2025
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Apr 2025

Abstract

In addition to copper, gold, and molybdenum, porphyry deposits are important reservoirs of critical metals such as rhenium, selenium, tellurium, and platinum group elements (PGEs). However, enrichment of cobalt (Co) has received little attention. Several studies have shown that Co enrichment does occur in porphyry deposits, however, the source(s) of Co and the mechanism(s) responsible for its enrichment in the high-temperature hydrothermal systems that ultimately form Co-rich porphyry deposits, are poorly understood. In order to address this knowledge gap, we investigated the Jinchang porphyry deposit in Northeast China which is one of the most Co-enriched porphyry deposits worldwide. In-situ elemental and Fe-S isotopic analysis, as well as electron backscatter diffraction, have been conducted on two types of pyrite (Py1 and Py2). Py1 exhibits a core-mantle-rim structure, with Co enrichment in the core (Avg. 4.5 wt%) and rim (Avg. 7.5 wt%). Py2 displays a distinct core-rim structure, with Co enrichment only in the rim (Avg. 8.4 wt%). The early Co-rich fluid led to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 core. As pyrite continued to grow, Co in the fluid was depleted, leading to the formation of the Co-poor Py1 mantle and Py2 core. The most significant changes in δ56Fe values and Co contents were observed between the Py2 core and Py2 rim (δ56Fe: Δ0.94 ‰, Co: Δ10.67 wt%). This significant variation was generated by the re-injection of Co-rich fluids, which led to the coupled dissolution-reprecipitation of pyrite, leading to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 rim and Py2 rim. Each injection of Co-rich fluid not only formed a Co-rich zone in pyrite, but also precipitated Co-bearing minerals, such as siegenite and cobaltite. The magmatic δ34S isotope signature of pyrite and chalcopyrite (1.5–5.3 ‰) rules out the possibility that Co originated from a sedimentary source. Due to the low Co content in felsic magmas, the repeated injections of Co-rich mafic magma are the only plausible source for the formation of such Co-rich fluids. Besides other possible causes, the heavy δ56Fefluid values derived from mafic magmas suggest the addition of serpentinized oceanic crust slab during subduction, which directly contributed to the formation of mafic magmas. Multiple injections of mafic magma can significantly enhance the Co content in ore-forming fluids, which may be a critical prerequisite for Co enrichment in porphyry deposits worldwide. Early high-temperature and high-salinity fluids create an environment highly favourable to Co enrichment. As temperatures decrease, Co begins to precipitate, and breccia pipes, which experience rapid temperature drops due to fracturing, become favourable areas for Co deposition. The main precipitation stage of Co pre-dates the main stage of porphyry Cu-Au ore formation, which might be the reason that Co enrichment in porphyry deposits normally goes undetected.

Keywords

    Cobalt-rich porphyry deposit, In-situ Fe-S isotope, Jinchang deposit, Multiple injections of mafic magma, Pyrite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections. / Shan, Peng Fei; Cao, Ming Jian; Tang, Dong Mei et al.
In: Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, Vol. 399, 15.06.2025, p. 125-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Shan, PF, Cao, MJ, Tang, DM, Qiu, ZJ, Evans, NJ, Lazarov, M, Wang, DC, Hu, W, Qin, KZ, Horn, I & Weyer, S 2025, 'Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections', Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, vol. 399, pp. 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022
Shan, P. F., Cao, M. J., Tang, D. M., Qiu, Z. J., Evans, N. J., Lazarov, M., Wang, D. C., Hu, W., Qin, K. Z., Horn, I., & Weyer, S. (2025). Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 399, 125-143. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022
Shan PF, Cao MJ, Tang DM, Qiu ZJ, Evans NJ, Lazarov M et al. Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections. Geochimica et cosmochimica acta. 2025 Jun 15;399:125-143. Epub 2025 Apr 27. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022
Shan, Peng Fei ; Cao, Ming Jian ; Tang, Dong Mei et al. / Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections. In: Geochimica et cosmochimica acta. 2025 ; Vol. 399. pp. 125-143.
Download
@article{f17f21238c8845f8ad9b8ede8b6b79ea,
title = "Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections",
abstract = "In addition to copper, gold, and molybdenum, porphyry deposits are important reservoirs of critical metals such as rhenium, selenium, tellurium, and platinum group elements (PGEs). However, enrichment of cobalt (Co) has received little attention. Several studies have shown that Co enrichment does occur in porphyry deposits, however, the source(s) of Co and the mechanism(s) responsible for its enrichment in the high-temperature hydrothermal systems that ultimately form Co-rich porphyry deposits, are poorly understood. In order to address this knowledge gap, we investigated the Jinchang porphyry deposit in Northeast China which is one of the most Co-enriched porphyry deposits worldwide. In-situ elemental and Fe-S isotopic analysis, as well as electron backscatter diffraction, have been conducted on two types of pyrite (Py1 and Py2). Py1 exhibits a core-mantle-rim structure, with Co enrichment in the core (Avg. 4.5 wt%) and rim (Avg. 7.5 wt%). Py2 displays a distinct core-rim structure, with Co enrichment only in the rim (Avg. 8.4 wt%). The early Co-rich fluid led to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 core. As pyrite continued to grow, Co in the fluid was depleted, leading to the formation of the Co-poor Py1 mantle and Py2 core. The most significant changes in δ56Fe values and Co contents were observed between the Py2 core and Py2 rim (δ56Fe: Δ0.94 ‰, Co: Δ10.67 wt%). This significant variation was generated by the re-injection of Co-rich fluids, which led to the coupled dissolution-reprecipitation of pyrite, leading to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 rim and Py2 rim. Each injection of Co-rich fluid not only formed a Co-rich zone in pyrite, but also precipitated Co-bearing minerals, such as siegenite and cobaltite. The magmatic δ34S isotope signature of pyrite and chalcopyrite (1.5–5.3 ‰) rules out the possibility that Co originated from a sedimentary source. Due to the low Co content in felsic magmas, the repeated injections of Co-rich mafic magma are the only plausible source for the formation of such Co-rich fluids. Besides other possible causes, the heavy δ56Fefluid values derived from mafic magmas suggest the addition of serpentinized oceanic crust slab during subduction, which directly contributed to the formation of mafic magmas. Multiple injections of mafic magma can significantly enhance the Co content in ore-forming fluids, which may be a critical prerequisite for Co enrichment in porphyry deposits worldwide. Early high-temperature and high-salinity fluids create an environment highly favourable to Co enrichment. As temperatures decrease, Co begins to precipitate, and breccia pipes, which experience rapid temperature drops due to fracturing, become favourable areas for Co deposition. The main precipitation stage of Co pre-dates the main stage of porphyry Cu-Au ore formation, which might be the reason that Co enrichment in porphyry deposits normally goes undetected.",
keywords = "Cobalt-rich porphyry deposit, In-situ Fe-S isotope, Jinchang deposit, Multiple injections of mafic magma, Pyrite",
author = "Shan, {Peng Fei} and Cao, {Ming Jian} and Tang, {Dong Mei} and Qiu, {Zheng Jie} and Evans, {Noreen J.} and Marina Lazarov and Wang, {Da Chuan} and Wei Hu and Qin, {Ke Zhang} and Ingo Horn and Stefan Weyer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 Elsevier Ltd",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022",
language = "English",
volume = "399",
pages = "125--143",
journal = "Geochimica et cosmochimica acta",
issn = "0016-7037",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cobalt-rich porphyry deposits derived from multiple mafic magma injections

AU - Shan, Peng Fei

AU - Cao, Ming Jian

AU - Tang, Dong Mei

AU - Qiu, Zheng Jie

AU - Evans, Noreen J.

AU - Lazarov, Marina

AU - Wang, Da Chuan

AU - Hu, Wei

AU - Qin, Ke Zhang

AU - Horn, Ingo

AU - Weyer, Stefan

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 Elsevier Ltd

PY - 2025/4/27

Y1 - 2025/4/27

N2 - In addition to copper, gold, and molybdenum, porphyry deposits are important reservoirs of critical metals such as rhenium, selenium, tellurium, and platinum group elements (PGEs). However, enrichment of cobalt (Co) has received little attention. Several studies have shown that Co enrichment does occur in porphyry deposits, however, the source(s) of Co and the mechanism(s) responsible for its enrichment in the high-temperature hydrothermal systems that ultimately form Co-rich porphyry deposits, are poorly understood. In order to address this knowledge gap, we investigated the Jinchang porphyry deposit in Northeast China which is one of the most Co-enriched porphyry deposits worldwide. In-situ elemental and Fe-S isotopic analysis, as well as electron backscatter diffraction, have been conducted on two types of pyrite (Py1 and Py2). Py1 exhibits a core-mantle-rim structure, with Co enrichment in the core (Avg. 4.5 wt%) and rim (Avg. 7.5 wt%). Py2 displays a distinct core-rim structure, with Co enrichment only in the rim (Avg. 8.4 wt%). The early Co-rich fluid led to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 core. As pyrite continued to grow, Co in the fluid was depleted, leading to the formation of the Co-poor Py1 mantle and Py2 core. The most significant changes in δ56Fe values and Co contents were observed between the Py2 core and Py2 rim (δ56Fe: Δ0.94 ‰, Co: Δ10.67 wt%). This significant variation was generated by the re-injection of Co-rich fluids, which led to the coupled dissolution-reprecipitation of pyrite, leading to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 rim and Py2 rim. Each injection of Co-rich fluid not only formed a Co-rich zone in pyrite, but also precipitated Co-bearing minerals, such as siegenite and cobaltite. The magmatic δ34S isotope signature of pyrite and chalcopyrite (1.5–5.3 ‰) rules out the possibility that Co originated from a sedimentary source. Due to the low Co content in felsic magmas, the repeated injections of Co-rich mafic magma are the only plausible source for the formation of such Co-rich fluids. Besides other possible causes, the heavy δ56Fefluid values derived from mafic magmas suggest the addition of serpentinized oceanic crust slab during subduction, which directly contributed to the formation of mafic magmas. Multiple injections of mafic magma can significantly enhance the Co content in ore-forming fluids, which may be a critical prerequisite for Co enrichment in porphyry deposits worldwide. Early high-temperature and high-salinity fluids create an environment highly favourable to Co enrichment. As temperatures decrease, Co begins to precipitate, and breccia pipes, which experience rapid temperature drops due to fracturing, become favourable areas for Co deposition. The main precipitation stage of Co pre-dates the main stage of porphyry Cu-Au ore formation, which might be the reason that Co enrichment in porphyry deposits normally goes undetected.

AB - In addition to copper, gold, and molybdenum, porphyry deposits are important reservoirs of critical metals such as rhenium, selenium, tellurium, and platinum group elements (PGEs). However, enrichment of cobalt (Co) has received little attention. Several studies have shown that Co enrichment does occur in porphyry deposits, however, the source(s) of Co and the mechanism(s) responsible for its enrichment in the high-temperature hydrothermal systems that ultimately form Co-rich porphyry deposits, are poorly understood. In order to address this knowledge gap, we investigated the Jinchang porphyry deposit in Northeast China which is one of the most Co-enriched porphyry deposits worldwide. In-situ elemental and Fe-S isotopic analysis, as well as electron backscatter diffraction, have been conducted on two types of pyrite (Py1 and Py2). Py1 exhibits a core-mantle-rim structure, with Co enrichment in the core (Avg. 4.5 wt%) and rim (Avg. 7.5 wt%). Py2 displays a distinct core-rim structure, with Co enrichment only in the rim (Avg. 8.4 wt%). The early Co-rich fluid led to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 core. As pyrite continued to grow, Co in the fluid was depleted, leading to the formation of the Co-poor Py1 mantle and Py2 core. The most significant changes in δ56Fe values and Co contents were observed between the Py2 core and Py2 rim (δ56Fe: Δ0.94 ‰, Co: Δ10.67 wt%). This significant variation was generated by the re-injection of Co-rich fluids, which led to the coupled dissolution-reprecipitation of pyrite, leading to the formation of the Co-rich Py1 rim and Py2 rim. Each injection of Co-rich fluid not only formed a Co-rich zone in pyrite, but also precipitated Co-bearing minerals, such as siegenite and cobaltite. The magmatic δ34S isotope signature of pyrite and chalcopyrite (1.5–5.3 ‰) rules out the possibility that Co originated from a sedimentary source. Due to the low Co content in felsic magmas, the repeated injections of Co-rich mafic magma are the only plausible source for the formation of such Co-rich fluids. Besides other possible causes, the heavy δ56Fefluid values derived from mafic magmas suggest the addition of serpentinized oceanic crust slab during subduction, which directly contributed to the formation of mafic magmas. Multiple injections of mafic magma can significantly enhance the Co content in ore-forming fluids, which may be a critical prerequisite for Co enrichment in porphyry deposits worldwide. Early high-temperature and high-salinity fluids create an environment highly favourable to Co enrichment. As temperatures decrease, Co begins to precipitate, and breccia pipes, which experience rapid temperature drops due to fracturing, become favourable areas for Co deposition. The main precipitation stage of Co pre-dates the main stage of porphyry Cu-Au ore formation, which might be the reason that Co enrichment in porphyry deposits normally goes undetected.

KW - Cobalt-rich porphyry deposit

KW - In-situ Fe-S isotope

KW - Jinchang deposit

KW - Multiple injections of mafic magma

KW - Pyrite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105004309195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022

DO - 10.1016/j.gca.2025.04.022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105004309195

VL - 399

SP - 125

EP - 143

JO - Geochimica et cosmochimica acta

JF - Geochimica et cosmochimica acta

SN - 0016-7037

ER -

By the same author(s)