Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number035037
JournalBiomedical Materials (Bristol)
Volume16
Issue number3
Early online date21 Apr 2021
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Abstract

Porous magnesium implants are of particular interest for application as resorbable bone substitutes, due to their mechanical strength and a Young’s modulus similar to bone. The objective of the present study was to compare the biocompatibility, bone and tissue ingrowth, and the degradation behaviour of scaffolds made from the magnesium alloys LAE442 (n = 40) and Mg-La2 (n = 40) in vivo. For this purpose, cylindrical magnesium scaffolds (diameter 4 mm, length 5 mm) with defined, interconnecting pores were produced by investment casting and coated with MgF2. The scaffolds were inserted into the cancellous part of the greater trochanter ossis femoris of rabbits. After implantation periods of 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks, the bone-scaffold compounds were evaluated using ex vivo µCT80 images, histological examinations and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis. The La2 scaffolds showed inhomogeneous and rapid degradation, with inferior osseointegration as compared to LAE442. For the early observation times, no bone and tissue could be observed in the pores of La2. Furthermore, the excessive amount of foreign body cells and fibrous capsule formation indicates insufficient biocompatibility of the La2 scaffolds. In contrast, the LAE442 scaffolds showed slow degradation and better osseointegration. Good vascularization, a moderate cellular response, bone and osteoid-like bone matrix at all implantation periods were observed in the pores of LAE442. In summary, porous LAE442 showed promise as a degradable scaffold for bone defect repair, based on its degradation behaviour and biocompatibility. However, further studies are needed to show it would have the necessary mechanical properties required over time for weight-bearing bone defects.

Keywords

    Biocompatibility, Magnesium alloy, Osseointegration, Porous scaffold, µCT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2. / Kleer-Reiter, N.; Julmi, S.; Feichtner, F. et al.
In: Biomedical Materials (Bristol), Vol. 16, No. 3, 035037, 05.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Kleer-Reiter, N, Julmi, S, Feichtner, F, Waselau, AC, Klose, C, Wriggers, P, Maier, HJ & Meyer-Lindenberg, A 2021, 'Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2', Biomedical Materials (Bristol), vol. 16, no. 3, 035037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/abf5c5
Kleer-Reiter, N., Julmi, S., Feichtner, F., Waselau, A. C., Klose, C., Wriggers, P., Maier, H. J., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2021). Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2. Biomedical Materials (Bristol), 16(3), Article 035037. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/abf5c5
Kleer-Reiter N, Julmi S, Feichtner F, Waselau AC, Klose C, Wriggers P et al. Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2. Biomedical Materials (Bristol). 2021 May;16(3):035037. Epub 2021 Apr 21. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/abf5c5
Kleer-Reiter, N. ; Julmi, S. ; Feichtner, F. et al. / Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2. In: Biomedical Materials (Bristol). 2021 ; Vol. 16, No. 3.
Download
@article{d51d55276b2e473fa5932fa314d51266,
title = "Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2",
abstract = "Porous magnesium implants are of particular interest for application as resorbable bone substitutes, due to their mechanical strength and a Young{\textquoteright}s modulus similar to bone. The objective of the present study was to compare the biocompatibility, bone and tissue ingrowth, and the degradation behaviour of scaffolds made from the magnesium alloys LAE442 (n = 40) and Mg-La2 (n = 40) in vivo. For this purpose, cylindrical magnesium scaffolds (diameter 4 mm, length 5 mm) with defined, interconnecting pores were produced by investment casting and coated with MgF2. The scaffolds were inserted into the cancellous part of the greater trochanter ossis femoris of rabbits. After implantation periods of 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks, the bone-scaffold compounds were evaluated using ex vivo µCT80 images, histological examinations and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis. The La2 scaffolds showed inhomogeneous and rapid degradation, with inferior osseointegration as compared to LAE442. For the early observation times, no bone and tissue could be observed in the pores of La2. Furthermore, the excessive amount of foreign body cells and fibrous capsule formation indicates insufficient biocompatibility of the La2 scaffolds. In contrast, the LAE442 scaffolds showed slow degradation and better osseointegration. Good vascularization, a moderate cellular response, bone and osteoid-like bone matrix at all implantation periods were observed in the pores of LAE442. In summary, porous LAE442 showed promise as a degradable scaffold for bone defect repair, based on its degradation behaviour and biocompatibility. However, further studies are needed to show it would have the necessary mechanical properties required over time for weight-bearing bone defects.",
keywords = "Biocompatibility, Magnesium alloy, Osseointegration, Porous scaffold, µCT",
author = "N. Kleer-Reiter and S. Julmi and F. Feichtner and Waselau, {A. C.} and C. Klose and P. Wriggers and Maier, {H. J.} and A. Meyer-Lindenberg",
year = "2021",
month = may,
doi = "10.1088/1748-605X/abf5c5",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Biomedical Materials (Bristol)",
issn = "1748-6041",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biocompatibility and degradation of the open-pored magnesium scaffolds LAE442 and La2

AU - Kleer-Reiter, N.

AU - Julmi, S.

AU - Feichtner, F.

AU - Waselau, A. C.

AU - Klose, C.

AU - Wriggers, P.

AU - Maier, H. J.

AU - Meyer-Lindenberg, A.

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - Porous magnesium implants are of particular interest for application as resorbable bone substitutes, due to their mechanical strength and a Young’s modulus similar to bone. The objective of the present study was to compare the biocompatibility, bone and tissue ingrowth, and the degradation behaviour of scaffolds made from the magnesium alloys LAE442 (n = 40) and Mg-La2 (n = 40) in vivo. For this purpose, cylindrical magnesium scaffolds (diameter 4 mm, length 5 mm) with defined, interconnecting pores were produced by investment casting and coated with MgF2. The scaffolds were inserted into the cancellous part of the greater trochanter ossis femoris of rabbits. After implantation periods of 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks, the bone-scaffold compounds were evaluated using ex vivo µCT80 images, histological examinations and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis. The La2 scaffolds showed inhomogeneous and rapid degradation, with inferior osseointegration as compared to LAE442. For the early observation times, no bone and tissue could be observed in the pores of La2. Furthermore, the excessive amount of foreign body cells and fibrous capsule formation indicates insufficient biocompatibility of the La2 scaffolds. In contrast, the LAE442 scaffolds showed slow degradation and better osseointegration. Good vascularization, a moderate cellular response, bone and osteoid-like bone matrix at all implantation periods were observed in the pores of LAE442. In summary, porous LAE442 showed promise as a degradable scaffold for bone defect repair, based on its degradation behaviour and biocompatibility. However, further studies are needed to show it would have the necessary mechanical properties required over time for weight-bearing bone defects.

AB - Porous magnesium implants are of particular interest for application as resorbable bone substitutes, due to their mechanical strength and a Young’s modulus similar to bone. The objective of the present study was to compare the biocompatibility, bone and tissue ingrowth, and the degradation behaviour of scaffolds made from the magnesium alloys LAE442 (n = 40) and Mg-La2 (n = 40) in vivo. For this purpose, cylindrical magnesium scaffolds (diameter 4 mm, length 5 mm) with defined, interconnecting pores were produced by investment casting and coated with MgF2. The scaffolds were inserted into the cancellous part of the greater trochanter ossis femoris of rabbits. After implantation periods of 6, 12, 24 and 36 weeks, the bone-scaffold compounds were evaluated using ex vivo µCT80 images, histological examinations and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis. The La2 scaffolds showed inhomogeneous and rapid degradation, with inferior osseointegration as compared to LAE442. For the early observation times, no bone and tissue could be observed in the pores of La2. Furthermore, the excessive amount of foreign body cells and fibrous capsule formation indicates insufficient biocompatibility of the La2 scaffolds. In contrast, the LAE442 scaffolds showed slow degradation and better osseointegration. Good vascularization, a moderate cellular response, bone and osteoid-like bone matrix at all implantation periods were observed in the pores of LAE442. In summary, porous LAE442 showed promise as a degradable scaffold for bone defect repair, based on its degradation behaviour and biocompatibility. However, further studies are needed to show it would have the necessary mechanical properties required over time for weight-bearing bone defects.

KW - Biocompatibility

KW - Magnesium alloy

KW - Osseointegration

KW - Porous scaffold

KW - µCT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105113647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1748-605X/abf5c5

DO - 10.1088/1748-605X/abf5c5

M3 - Article

C2 - 33827052

AN - SCOPUS:85105113647

VL - 16

JO - Biomedical Materials (Bristol)

JF - Biomedical Materials (Bristol)

SN - 1748-6041

IS - 3

M1 - 035037

ER -

By the same author(s)