Adaptive thermodynamic topology optimization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-119
Number of pages25
JournalStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
Volume63
Issue number1
Early online date8 Oct 2020
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

The benefit of adaptive meshing strategies for a recently introduced thermodynamic topology optimization is presented. Employing an elementwise gradient penalization, stability is obtained and checkerboarding prevented while very fine structures can be resolved sharply using adaptive meshing at material-void interfaces. The usage of coarse elements and thereby smaller design space does not restrict the obtainable structures if a proper adaptive remeshing is considered during the optimization. Qualitatively equal structures and quantitatively the same stiffness as for uniform meshing are obtained with less degrees of freedom, memory requirement and overall optimization runtime. In addition, the adaptivity can be used to zoom into coarse global structures to better resolve details of interesting spots such as truss nodes.

Keywords

    Adaptivity, Geometric multigrid, Thermodynamic topology optimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Adaptive thermodynamic topology optimization. / Vogel, Andreas; Junker, Philipp.
In: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.2021, p. 95-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Vogel A, Junker P. Adaptive thermodynamic topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2021 Jan;63(1):95-119. Epub 2020 Oct 8. doi: 10.1007/s00158-020-02667-4
Download
@article{ebd0bf18ad3047f09d51e48dbc91704c,
title = "Adaptive thermodynamic topology optimization",
abstract = "The benefit of adaptive meshing strategies for a recently introduced thermodynamic topology optimization is presented. Employing an elementwise gradient penalization, stability is obtained and checkerboarding prevented while very fine structures can be resolved sharply using adaptive meshing at material-void interfaces. The usage of coarse elements and thereby smaller design space does not restrict the obtainable structures if a proper adaptive remeshing is considered during the optimization. Qualitatively equal structures and quantitatively the same stiffness as for uniform meshing are obtained with less degrees of freedom, memory requirement and overall optimization runtime. In addition, the adaptivity can be used to zoom into coarse global structures to better resolve details of interesting spots such as truss nodes.",
keywords = "Adaptivity, Geometric multigrid, Thermodynamic topology optimization",
author = "Andreas Vogel and Philipp Junker",
note = "Funding information: We gratefully acknowledge the computing time on the computing cluster of the SFB 837 and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of the Ruhr University Bochum, Germany, which has been employed for the presented studies.",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1007/s00158-020-02667-4",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "95--119",
journal = "Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization",
issn = "1615-147X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptive thermodynamic topology optimization

AU - Vogel, Andreas

AU - Junker, Philipp

N1 - Funding information: We gratefully acknowledge the computing time on the computing cluster of the SFB 837 and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of the Ruhr University Bochum, Germany, which has been employed for the presented studies.

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - The benefit of adaptive meshing strategies for a recently introduced thermodynamic topology optimization is presented. Employing an elementwise gradient penalization, stability is obtained and checkerboarding prevented while very fine structures can be resolved sharply using adaptive meshing at material-void interfaces. The usage of coarse elements and thereby smaller design space does not restrict the obtainable structures if a proper adaptive remeshing is considered during the optimization. Qualitatively equal structures and quantitatively the same stiffness as for uniform meshing are obtained with less degrees of freedom, memory requirement and overall optimization runtime. In addition, the adaptivity can be used to zoom into coarse global structures to better resolve details of interesting spots such as truss nodes.

AB - The benefit of adaptive meshing strategies for a recently introduced thermodynamic topology optimization is presented. Employing an elementwise gradient penalization, stability is obtained and checkerboarding prevented while very fine structures can be resolved sharply using adaptive meshing at material-void interfaces. The usage of coarse elements and thereby smaller design space does not restrict the obtainable structures if a proper adaptive remeshing is considered during the optimization. Qualitatively equal structures and quantitatively the same stiffness as for uniform meshing are obtained with less degrees of freedom, memory requirement and overall optimization runtime. In addition, the adaptivity can be used to zoom into coarse global structures to better resolve details of interesting spots such as truss nodes.

KW - Adaptivity

KW - Geometric multigrid

KW - Thermodynamic topology optimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092364561&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00158-020-02667-4

DO - 10.1007/s00158-020-02667-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85092364561

VL - 63

SP - 95

EP - 119

JO - Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

JF - Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

SN - 1615-147X

IS - 1

ER -

By the same author(s)