Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer review

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number101013
Number of pages21
JournalEnergy Conversion and Management: X
Volume26
Early online date14 Apr 2025
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Abstract

Considering Europe's imperative to reduce CO2 emissions under the Paris Climate Agreement, there is an urgent need to transition to low-CO2 steam generation in industrial processes. Since steam generation is a major contributor to carbon emissions. This paper presents a comparative analysis across various steam generation technologies, including heat pumps, biogas, biomethane, geothermal, and solar thermal solutions. Employing a multidimensional approach, the study assesses key performance indicators such as steam generation cost, CO2 emissions, CO2 abatement costs, and energy demand to unveil viable alternatives to current fossil-based technologies. The findings identify a clear path for transitioning to low-CO2 steam generation within industrial processes, emphasizing the exploration of high-temperature renewable heat sources, followed by electrification and energy carrier substitution approaches. High-temperature renewable heat sources offer the advantage of achieving an 80–90% reduction in CO2 emissions, with the potential for net cost savings at current CO2 pricing. Addressing challenges associated with each steam generation technology is pivotal to finding the perfect fit for each industrial process and ensuring a successful transition to low-CO2 steam generation.

Keywords

    CO abatement, Comparative analysis, Defossilization approaches, Low-CO steam generation, Renewable heat sources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies. / Ziarkash, Waris; Bünning, Sven; Bensmann, Astrid et al.
In: Energy Conversion and Management: X, Vol. 26, 101013, 04.2025.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer review

Ziarkash, W, Bünning, S, Bensmann, A, Baake, E & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R 2025, 'A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies', Energy Conversion and Management: X, vol. 26, 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101013
Ziarkash, W., Bünning, S., Bensmann, A., Baake, E., & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. (2025). A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 26, Article 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101013
Ziarkash W, Bünning S, Bensmann A, Baake E, Hanke-Rauschenbach R. A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2025 Apr;26:101013. Epub 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101013
Ziarkash, Waris ; Bünning, Sven ; Bensmann, Astrid et al. / A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies. In: Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2025 ; Vol. 26.
Download
@article{a58d8a1386ce428bbd01815872b5048f,
title = "A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies",
abstract = "Considering Europe's imperative to reduce CO2 emissions under the Paris Climate Agreement, there is an urgent need to transition to low-CO2 steam generation in industrial processes. Since steam generation is a major contributor to carbon emissions. This paper presents a comparative analysis across various steam generation technologies, including heat pumps, biogas, biomethane, geothermal, and solar thermal solutions. Employing a multidimensional approach, the study assesses key performance indicators such as steam generation cost, CO2 emissions, CO2 abatement costs, and energy demand to unveil viable alternatives to current fossil-based technologies. The findings identify a clear path for transitioning to low-CO2 steam generation within industrial processes, emphasizing the exploration of high-temperature renewable heat sources, followed by electrification and energy carrier substitution approaches. High-temperature renewable heat sources offer the advantage of achieving an 80–90% reduction in CO2 emissions, with the potential for net cost savings at current CO2 pricing. Addressing challenges associated with each steam generation technology is pivotal to finding the perfect fit for each industrial process and ensuring a successful transition to low-CO2 steam generation.",
keywords = "CO abatement, Comparative analysis, Defossilization approaches, Low-CO steam generation, Renewable heat sources",
author = "Waris Ziarkash and Sven B{\"u}nning and Astrid Bensmann and Egbert Baake and Richard Hanke-Rauschenbach",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s)",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101013",
language = "English",
volume = "26",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative analysis of low-CO2 steam generation technologies

AU - Ziarkash, Waris

AU - Bünning, Sven

AU - Bensmann, Astrid

AU - Baake, Egbert

AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, Richard

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)

PY - 2025/4

Y1 - 2025/4

N2 - Considering Europe's imperative to reduce CO2 emissions under the Paris Climate Agreement, there is an urgent need to transition to low-CO2 steam generation in industrial processes. Since steam generation is a major contributor to carbon emissions. This paper presents a comparative analysis across various steam generation technologies, including heat pumps, biogas, biomethane, geothermal, and solar thermal solutions. Employing a multidimensional approach, the study assesses key performance indicators such as steam generation cost, CO2 emissions, CO2 abatement costs, and energy demand to unveil viable alternatives to current fossil-based technologies. The findings identify a clear path for transitioning to low-CO2 steam generation within industrial processes, emphasizing the exploration of high-temperature renewable heat sources, followed by electrification and energy carrier substitution approaches. High-temperature renewable heat sources offer the advantage of achieving an 80–90% reduction in CO2 emissions, with the potential for net cost savings at current CO2 pricing. Addressing challenges associated with each steam generation technology is pivotal to finding the perfect fit for each industrial process and ensuring a successful transition to low-CO2 steam generation.

AB - Considering Europe's imperative to reduce CO2 emissions under the Paris Climate Agreement, there is an urgent need to transition to low-CO2 steam generation in industrial processes. Since steam generation is a major contributor to carbon emissions. This paper presents a comparative analysis across various steam generation technologies, including heat pumps, biogas, biomethane, geothermal, and solar thermal solutions. Employing a multidimensional approach, the study assesses key performance indicators such as steam generation cost, CO2 emissions, CO2 abatement costs, and energy demand to unveil viable alternatives to current fossil-based technologies. The findings identify a clear path for transitioning to low-CO2 steam generation within industrial processes, emphasizing the exploration of high-temperature renewable heat sources, followed by electrification and energy carrier substitution approaches. High-temperature renewable heat sources offer the advantage of achieving an 80–90% reduction in CO2 emissions, with the potential for net cost savings at current CO2 pricing. Addressing challenges associated with each steam generation technology is pivotal to finding the perfect fit for each industrial process and ensuring a successful transition to low-CO2 steam generation.

KW - CO abatement

KW - Comparative analysis

KW - Defossilization approaches

KW - Low-CO steam generation

KW - Renewable heat sources

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003220879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101013

DO - 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101013

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:105003220879

VL - 26

JO - Energy Conversion and Management: X

JF - Energy Conversion and Management: X

SN - 2590-1745

M1 - 101013

ER -

By the same author(s)