The Effect of Attentional Direction on Sub-Stages of Preparing for Motor Skill Execution Across Practice

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Mengkai Luan
  • Arash Mirifar

Externe Organisationen

  • Technische Universität München (TUM)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1292-1309
Seitenumfang18
FachzeitschriftPerceptual and Motor Skills
Jahrgang128
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 30 Apr. 2021
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

While several empirical studies using dual-task methodology have examined the effect of attentional direction on motor skill execution; few have studied the effect of attentional direction on just the preparation phase of motor practice. In this study, via a keying sequence paradigm, we explored processing stages of preparation for a motor skill and disentangled the effect of attentional direction on various stages across practice. First, participants learned two keying sequences (three versus six keys). Then, they practiced the keying sequences in response to corresponding sequence labels under two block-wise alternating dual-task conditions. To dissect the preparation phase into sequence selection and sequence initiation stages, participants received varying amounts of preparation time (0, 300, 900 ms) before a starting signal instructed them to begin sequence execution. In each trial, a tone was paired with one of the three or six keypresses, and participants indicated either the keypress with which the tone was presented (skill-focused dual task) or the tone’s pitch (extraneous dual task) after the sequence execution. We found that attentional direction affected only the sequence selection stage, not the sequence initiation stage. During early practice, compared to drawing attention away from execution, directing attention toward execution led to faster sequence selection. This advantage decreased with practice and vanished during late blocks of trials. Moreover, for the execution phase, relative to directing attention toward execution, drawing attention away from execution led to better performance of keying sequence execution across practice. Thus, attentional direction alone does not fully explain the difference between performance patterns at different skill levels in the dual-task literature; rather, types of motor skills and dual task difficulty levels may also drive performance differences.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

The Effect of Attentional Direction on Sub-Stages of Preparing for Motor Skill Execution Across Practice. / Luan, Mengkai; Mirifar, Arash.
in: Perceptual and Motor Skills, Jahrgang 128, Nr. 3, 30.04.2021, S. 1292-1309.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{b0241054e56e49dbaaf4d3f1770a9a83,
title = "The Effect of Attentional Direction on Sub-Stages of Preparing for Motor Skill Execution Across Practice",
abstract = "While several empirical studies using dual-task methodology have examined the effect of attentional direction on motor skill execution; few have studied the effect of attentional direction on just the preparation phase of motor practice. In this study, via a keying sequence paradigm, we explored processing stages of preparation for a motor skill and disentangled the effect of attentional direction on various stages across practice. First, participants learned two keying sequences (three versus six keys). Then, they practiced the keying sequences in response to corresponding sequence labels under two block-wise alternating dual-task conditions. To dissect the preparation phase into sequence selection and sequence initiation stages, participants received varying amounts of preparation time (0, 300, 900 ms) before a starting signal instructed them to begin sequence execution. In each trial, a tone was paired with one of the three or six keypresses, and participants indicated either the keypress with which the tone was presented (skill-focused dual task) or the tone{\textquoteright}s pitch (extraneous dual task) after the sequence execution. We found that attentional direction affected only the sequence selection stage, not the sequence initiation stage. During early practice, compared to drawing attention away from execution, directing attention toward execution led to faster sequence selection. This advantage decreased with practice and vanished during late blocks of trials. Moreover, for the execution phase, relative to directing attention toward execution, drawing attention away from execution led to better performance of keying sequence execution across practice. Thus, attentional direction alone does not fully explain the difference between performance patterns at different skill levels in the dual-task literature; rather, types of motor skills and dual task difficulty levels may also drive performance differences.",
keywords = "attentional direction, dual task, motor skill, preparation phase",
author = "Mengkai Luan and Arash Mirifar",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/00315125211009026",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
pages = "1292--1309",
journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",
issn = "0031-5125",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Attentional Direction on Sub-Stages of Preparing for Motor Skill Execution Across Practice

AU - Luan, Mengkai

AU - Mirifar, Arash

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.

PY - 2021/4/30

Y1 - 2021/4/30

N2 - While several empirical studies using dual-task methodology have examined the effect of attentional direction on motor skill execution; few have studied the effect of attentional direction on just the preparation phase of motor practice. In this study, via a keying sequence paradigm, we explored processing stages of preparation for a motor skill and disentangled the effect of attentional direction on various stages across practice. First, participants learned two keying sequences (three versus six keys). Then, they practiced the keying sequences in response to corresponding sequence labels under two block-wise alternating dual-task conditions. To dissect the preparation phase into sequence selection and sequence initiation stages, participants received varying amounts of preparation time (0, 300, 900 ms) before a starting signal instructed them to begin sequence execution. In each trial, a tone was paired with one of the three or six keypresses, and participants indicated either the keypress with which the tone was presented (skill-focused dual task) or the tone’s pitch (extraneous dual task) after the sequence execution. We found that attentional direction affected only the sequence selection stage, not the sequence initiation stage. During early practice, compared to drawing attention away from execution, directing attention toward execution led to faster sequence selection. This advantage decreased with practice and vanished during late blocks of trials. Moreover, for the execution phase, relative to directing attention toward execution, drawing attention away from execution led to better performance of keying sequence execution across practice. Thus, attentional direction alone does not fully explain the difference between performance patterns at different skill levels in the dual-task literature; rather, types of motor skills and dual task difficulty levels may also drive performance differences.

AB - While several empirical studies using dual-task methodology have examined the effect of attentional direction on motor skill execution; few have studied the effect of attentional direction on just the preparation phase of motor practice. In this study, via a keying sequence paradigm, we explored processing stages of preparation for a motor skill and disentangled the effect of attentional direction on various stages across practice. First, participants learned two keying sequences (three versus six keys). Then, they practiced the keying sequences in response to corresponding sequence labels under two block-wise alternating dual-task conditions. To dissect the preparation phase into sequence selection and sequence initiation stages, participants received varying amounts of preparation time (0, 300, 900 ms) before a starting signal instructed them to begin sequence execution. In each trial, a tone was paired with one of the three or six keypresses, and participants indicated either the keypress with which the tone was presented (skill-focused dual task) or the tone’s pitch (extraneous dual task) after the sequence execution. We found that attentional direction affected only the sequence selection stage, not the sequence initiation stage. During early practice, compared to drawing attention away from execution, directing attention toward execution led to faster sequence selection. This advantage decreased with practice and vanished during late blocks of trials. Moreover, for the execution phase, relative to directing attention toward execution, drawing attention away from execution led to better performance of keying sequence execution across practice. Thus, attentional direction alone does not fully explain the difference between performance patterns at different skill levels in the dual-task literature; rather, types of motor skills and dual task difficulty levels may also drive performance differences.

KW - attentional direction

KW - dual task

KW - motor skill

KW - preparation phase

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105141655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/00315125211009026

DO - 10.1177/00315125211009026

M3 - Article

VL - 128

SP - 1292

EP - 1309

JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

SN - 0031-5125

IS - 3

ER -