Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

Sucht oder Autonomie? Neue ExpertInnen im Netz

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Nicola Mößner

Organisationseinheiten

Details

OriginalspracheDeutsch
Titel des SammelwerksPhilosophische Digitalisierungsforschung
UntertitelVerantwortung, Verständigung, Vernunft, Macht
ErscheinungsortBielefeld
Seiten197-217
Seitenumfang20
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 27 Aug. 2024

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, a significant number of people has seemingly been lured in believing conspiracy theories. Many deliberately disregarded expert advices by virologists and physicians to reduce new infections. This turning away from traditional expert authorities exemplifies the »crisis of expertise« that has been discussed in the philosophy of science for some time, namely that many people seem to have lost their trust in the established authority of expert knowledge and are looking for epistemic alternatives, especially on the Internet and in particular on social media. In this article, this digital cultural trend will be analysed. Will people actually becoming more epistemically autonomous as a result of this new tend? Attention is drawn to the epistemic and moral vulnerability of people who opt for new media as epistemic alternatives instead of relying on traditional expert opinion. It will be shown that some important presuppositions about the Internet and, especially, social media tools as alternative ways to gathering information and find moral support in a group of likeminded people do not hold.

Zitieren

Sucht oder Autonomie? Neue ExpertInnen im Netz. / Mößner, Nicola.
Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung: Verantwortung, Verständigung, Vernunft, Macht. Bielefeld, 2024. S. 197-217.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Mößner, N 2024, Sucht oder Autonomie? Neue ExpertInnen im Netz. in Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung: Verantwortung, Verständigung, Vernunft, Macht. Bielefeld, S. 197-217. <https://philarchive.org/rec/MNESOA>
Mößner, N. (2024). Sucht oder Autonomie? Neue ExpertInnen im Netz. In Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung: Verantwortung, Verständigung, Vernunft, Macht (S. 197-217). https://philarchive.org/rec/MNESOA
Mößner N. Sucht oder Autonomie? Neue ExpertInnen im Netz. in Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung: Verantwortung, Verständigung, Vernunft, Macht. Bielefeld. 2024. S. 197-217
Mößner, Nicola. / Sucht oder Autonomie? Neue ExpertInnen im Netz. Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung: Verantwortung, Verständigung, Vernunft, Macht. Bielefeld, 2024. S. 197-217
Download
@inbook{d0d9336fa0014766a371651b1c33e6b3,
title = "Sucht oder Autonomie?: Neue ExpertInnen im Netz",
abstract = "During the Covid-19 pandemic, a significant number of people has seemingly been lured in believing conspiracy theories. Many deliberately disregarded expert advices by virologists and physicians to reduce new infections. This turning away from traditional expert authorities exemplifies the »crisis of expertise« that has been discussed in the philosophy of science for some time, namely that many people seem to have lost their trust in the established authority of expert knowledge and are looking for epistemic alternatives, especially on the Internet and in particular on social media. In this article, this digital cultural trend will be analysed. Will people actually becoming more epistemically autonomous as a result of this new tend? Attention is drawn to the epistemic and moral vulnerability of people who opt for new media as epistemic alternatives instead of relying on traditional expert opinion. It will be shown that some important presuppositions about the Internet and, especially, social media tools as alternative ways to gathering information and find moral support in a group of likeminded people do not hold. ",
author = "Nicola M{\"o}{\ss}ner",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "27",
language = "Deutsch",
isbn = "978-3-8376-7497-2",
pages = "197--217",
booktitle = "Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sucht oder Autonomie?

T2 - Neue ExpertInnen im Netz

AU - Mößner, Nicola

PY - 2024/8/27

Y1 - 2024/8/27

N2 - During the Covid-19 pandemic, a significant number of people has seemingly been lured in believing conspiracy theories. Many deliberately disregarded expert advices by virologists and physicians to reduce new infections. This turning away from traditional expert authorities exemplifies the »crisis of expertise« that has been discussed in the philosophy of science for some time, namely that many people seem to have lost their trust in the established authority of expert knowledge and are looking for epistemic alternatives, especially on the Internet and in particular on social media. In this article, this digital cultural trend will be analysed. Will people actually becoming more epistemically autonomous as a result of this new tend? Attention is drawn to the epistemic and moral vulnerability of people who opt for new media as epistemic alternatives instead of relying on traditional expert opinion. It will be shown that some important presuppositions about the Internet and, especially, social media tools as alternative ways to gathering information and find moral support in a group of likeminded people do not hold.

AB - During the Covid-19 pandemic, a significant number of people has seemingly been lured in believing conspiracy theories. Many deliberately disregarded expert advices by virologists and physicians to reduce new infections. This turning away from traditional expert authorities exemplifies the »crisis of expertise« that has been discussed in the philosophy of science for some time, namely that many people seem to have lost their trust in the established authority of expert knowledge and are looking for epistemic alternatives, especially on the Internet and in particular on social media. In this article, this digital cultural trend will be analysed. Will people actually becoming more epistemically autonomous as a result of this new tend? Attention is drawn to the epistemic and moral vulnerability of people who opt for new media as epistemic alternatives instead of relying on traditional expert opinion. It will be shown that some important presuppositions about the Internet and, especially, social media tools as alternative ways to gathering information and find moral support in a group of likeminded people do not hold.

UR - https://philarchive.org/rec/MNEPDI

M3 - Beitrag in Buch/Sammelwerk

SN - 978-3-8376-7497-2

SP - 197

EP - 217

BT - Philosophische Digitalisierungsforschung

CY - Bielefeld

ER -