Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung

Autorschaft

  • Barbara Schröter
  • Claudia Sattler
  • Frieder Graef
  • Cheng Chen
  • Estephania Delgadillo
  • Isabel Hackenberg
  • Ernestine M. Halle
  • Anika Hirt
  • Andreas Kubatzki
  • Bettina Matzdorf

Externe Organisationen

  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V.
  • Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2
FachzeitschriftMethodological Innovations
Jahrgang11
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2018
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

For researchers, conducting face-to-face interviews is always a challenge as it often turns into a one-way directed information retrieval. Therefore, interviewees not always are very motivated, enthusiastic and cooperative in responding to the questions. In the end, this has implications for the quality of the interview data. To improve the interview setting and the resulting data, in several projects the Net-Map tool was used to conduct participatory social network analysis. The tool is a combination of in-depth interviews and participatory network mapping. During the interviews, the interviewee draws the network of relevant actors, notes down their motivations and evaluates and displays the actors’ influence and benefits by building towers using any kind of stacks. In this research note, we present the strengths and weaknesses of the method against the experiences with applying the Net-Map tool on four different continents and give ideas for improvements and further research.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents. / Schröter, Barbara; Sattler, Claudia; Graef, Frieder et al.
in: Methodological Innovations, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 2, 2018, S. 2.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschung

Schröter, B, Sattler, C, Graef, F, Chen, C, Delgadillo, E, Hackenberg, I, Halle, EM, Hirt, A, Kubatzki, A & Matzdorf, B 2018, 'Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents', Methodological Innovations, Jg. 11, Nr. 2, S. 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118787754
Schröter, B., Sattler, C., Graef, F., Chen, C., Delgadillo, E., Hackenberg, I., Halle, E. M., Hirt, A., Kubatzki, A., & Matzdorf, B. (2018). Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents. Methodological Innovations, 11(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118787754
Schröter B, Sattler C, Graef F, Chen C, Delgadillo E, Hackenberg I et al. Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents. Methodological Innovations. 2018;11(2):2. doi: 10.1177/2059799118787754
Schröter, Barbara ; Sattler, Claudia ; Graef, Frieder et al. / Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents. in: Methodological Innovations. 2018 ; Jahrgang 11, Nr. 2. S. 2.
Download
@article{be860c2c5675461aa28a1949a25a0846,
title = "Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents",
abstract = "For researchers, conducting face-to-face interviews is always a challenge as it often turns into a one-way directed information retrieval. Therefore, interviewees not always are very motivated, enthusiastic and cooperative in responding to the questions. In the end, this has implications for the quality of the interview data. To improve the interview setting and the resulting data, in several projects the Net-Map tool was used to conduct participatory social network analysis. The tool is a combination of in-depth interviews and participatory network mapping. During the interviews, the interviewee draws the network of relevant actors, notes down their motivations and evaluates and displays the actors{\textquoteright} influence and benefits by building towers using any kind of stacks. In this research note, we present the strengths and weaknesses of the method against the experiences with applying the Net-Map tool on four different continents and give ideas for improvements and further research.",
keywords = "Participatory research, community-based conservation, governance, natural resource management, social network analysis",
author = "Barbara Schr{\"o}ter and Claudia Sattler and Frieder Graef and Cheng Chen and Estephania Delgadillo and Isabel Hackenberg and Halle, {Ernestine M.} and Anika Hirt and Andreas Kubatzki and Bettina Matzdorf",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2018.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/2059799118787754",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "2",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strengths and weaknesses of the Net-Map tool for participatory social network analysis in resource management: experience from case studies conducted on four continents

AU - Schröter, Barbara

AU - Sattler, Claudia

AU - Graef, Frieder

AU - Chen, Cheng

AU - Delgadillo, Estephania

AU - Hackenberg, Isabel

AU - Halle, Ernestine M.

AU - Hirt, Anika

AU - Kubatzki, Andreas

AU - Matzdorf, Bettina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2018.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - For researchers, conducting face-to-face interviews is always a challenge as it often turns into a one-way directed information retrieval. Therefore, interviewees not always are very motivated, enthusiastic and cooperative in responding to the questions. In the end, this has implications for the quality of the interview data. To improve the interview setting and the resulting data, in several projects the Net-Map tool was used to conduct participatory social network analysis. The tool is a combination of in-depth interviews and participatory network mapping. During the interviews, the interviewee draws the network of relevant actors, notes down their motivations and evaluates and displays the actors’ influence and benefits by building towers using any kind of stacks. In this research note, we present the strengths and weaknesses of the method against the experiences with applying the Net-Map tool on four different continents and give ideas for improvements and further research.

AB - For researchers, conducting face-to-face interviews is always a challenge as it often turns into a one-way directed information retrieval. Therefore, interviewees not always are very motivated, enthusiastic and cooperative in responding to the questions. In the end, this has implications for the quality of the interview data. To improve the interview setting and the resulting data, in several projects the Net-Map tool was used to conduct participatory social network analysis. The tool is a combination of in-depth interviews and participatory network mapping. During the interviews, the interviewee draws the network of relevant actors, notes down their motivations and evaluates and displays the actors’ influence and benefits by building towers using any kind of stacks. In this research note, we present the strengths and weaknesses of the method against the experiences with applying the Net-Map tool on four different continents and give ideas for improvements and further research.

KW - Participatory research

KW - community-based conservation

KW - governance

KW - natural resource management

KW - social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089082667&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2059799118787754

DO - 10.1177/2059799118787754

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 2

JO - Methodological Innovations

JF - Methodological Innovations

IS - 2

ER -