Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 2057-2065 |
| Seitenumfang | 9 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Proceedings of the Design Society |
| Jahrgang | 1 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 27 Juli 2021 |
| Veranstaltung | 23rd International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2021 - Gothenburg, Schweden Dauer: 16 Aug. 2021 → 20 Aug. 2021 |
Abstract
One of the arguments against an increased use of repair is that, due to the constantly growing progress, an often already outdated component would be restored. However, refurbishment also allows a component to be modified in order to upgrade it to the state of the art or to adapt it to changed requirements. Many existing approaches regarding Design for Upgradeability are based on a modular product architecture. In these approaches, however, only the upgradeability of a product is considered through the exchange of components. Nevertheless, the exchange and improvement of individual component regions within a refurbishment has already been successfully carried out using additive processes. In this paper, a general method is presented to support the reengineering process, which is necessary to refurbish and upgrade a damaged component. In order to identify which areas can be replaced in the closed system of a component, the systematics of the modular product architecture are used. This allows dependencies between functions and component regions to be identified. Thus, it possible to determine which functions can be integrated into the intended component.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Informatik (insg.)
- Computergrafik und computergestütztes Design
- Informatik (insg.)
- Angewandte Informatik
- Informatik (insg.)
- Software
- Mathematik (insg.)
- Modellierung und Simulation
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Proceedings of the Design Society, Jahrgang 1, 27.07.2021, S. 2057-2065.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Konferenzaufsatz in Fachzeitschrift › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Method for upgrading a component within refurbishment
AU - Ganter, Nicola Viktoria
AU - Bode, Behrend
AU - Gembarski, Paul Christoph
AU - Lachmayer, Roland
N1 - Funding Information: This research was conducted in the scope of the research project RePARE-Regeneration of product and production systems through additive repair and refurbishment (Funding reference number 033R229) which is funded by Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the funding measure “Resourceefficient Circular Economy - Innovative Product Cycles” (ReziProK).
PY - 2021/7/27
Y1 - 2021/7/27
N2 - One of the arguments against an increased use of repair is that, due to the constantly growing progress, an often already outdated component would be restored. However, refurbishment also allows a component to be modified in order to upgrade it to the state of the art or to adapt it to changed requirements. Many existing approaches regarding Design for Upgradeability are based on a modular product architecture. In these approaches, however, only the upgradeability of a product is considered through the exchange of components. Nevertheless, the exchange and improvement of individual component regions within a refurbishment has already been successfully carried out using additive processes. In this paper, a general method is presented to support the reengineering process, which is necessary to refurbish and upgrade a damaged component. In order to identify which areas can be replaced in the closed system of a component, the systematics of the modular product architecture are used. This allows dependencies between functions and component regions to be identified. Thus, it possible to determine which functions can be integrated into the intended component.
AB - One of the arguments against an increased use of repair is that, due to the constantly growing progress, an often already outdated component would be restored. However, refurbishment also allows a component to be modified in order to upgrade it to the state of the art or to adapt it to changed requirements. Many existing approaches regarding Design for Upgradeability are based on a modular product architecture. In these approaches, however, only the upgradeability of a product is considered through the exchange of components. Nevertheless, the exchange and improvement of individual component regions within a refurbishment has already been successfully carried out using additive processes. In this paper, a general method is presented to support the reengineering process, which is necessary to refurbish and upgrade a damaged component. In order to identify which areas can be replaced in the closed system of a component, the systematics of the modular product architecture are used. This allows dependencies between functions and component regions to be identified. Thus, it possible to determine which functions can be integrated into the intended component.
KW - Additive Manufacturing
KW - Additive Repair and Refurbishment
KW - Circular economy
KW - Design methods
KW - Modularity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117754337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/pds.2021.467
DO - 10.1017/pds.2021.467
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85117754337
VL - 1
SP - 2057
EP - 2065
JO - Proceedings of the Design Society
JF - Proceedings of the Design Society
T2 - 23rd International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2021
Y2 - 16 August 2021 through 20 August 2021
ER -