Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 687-708 |
| Seitenumfang | 22 |
| Fachzeitschrift | IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology |
| Jahrgang | 54 |
| Ausgabenummer | 2 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - März 2005 |
Abstract
This paper actualizes the classification of location management methods published up to now and presents results of a related extensive performance comparison of the most important paradigms for location management in cellular networks. First, a universal structure of a performance analysis framework for location management methods is defined and analyzed. Then, both a user mobility model and a specific simulation environment claiming to be as realistic as possible are suggested and implemented. Finally, the simulation framework obtained is used for a systematic comparative performance analysis of a representative sample of the most important location management schemes. The overall conclusion is that a location-area based location management method designed around a profile or history-based direction information offers the absolute best performance, in terms of location management cost, compared to all other alternative approaches. The key difference from previous works in literature is clearly underlined concerning both mobility modeling and novel location management schemes.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Fahrzeugbau
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Elektrotechnik und Elektronik
- Mathematik (insg.)
- Angewandte Mathematik
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Jahrgang 54, Nr. 2, 03.2005, S. 687-708.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Location management in cellular networks
T2 - Classification of the most important paradigms, realistic simulation framework, and relative performance analysis
AU - Kyamakya, Kyandoghere
AU - Jobmann, Klaus
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - This paper actualizes the classification of location management methods published up to now and presents results of a related extensive performance comparison of the most important paradigms for location management in cellular networks. First, a universal structure of a performance analysis framework for location management methods is defined and analyzed. Then, both a user mobility model and a specific simulation environment claiming to be as realistic as possible are suggested and implemented. Finally, the simulation framework obtained is used for a systematic comparative performance analysis of a representative sample of the most important location management schemes. The overall conclusion is that a location-area based location management method designed around a profile or history-based direction information offers the absolute best performance, in terms of location management cost, compared to all other alternative approaches. The key difference from previous works in literature is clearly underlined concerning both mobility modeling and novel location management schemes.
AB - This paper actualizes the classification of location management methods published up to now and presents results of a related extensive performance comparison of the most important paradigms for location management in cellular networks. First, a universal structure of a performance analysis framework for location management methods is defined and analyzed. Then, both a user mobility model and a specific simulation environment claiming to be as realistic as possible are suggested and implemented. Finally, the simulation framework obtained is used for a systematic comparative performance analysis of a representative sample of the most important location management schemes. The overall conclusion is that a location-area based location management method designed around a profile or history-based direction information offers the absolute best performance, in terms of location management cost, compared to all other alternative approaches. The key difference from previous works in literature is clearly underlined concerning both mobility modeling and novel location management schemes.
KW - Location management paradigms
KW - Mobility modeling
KW - Realistic simulation framework
KW - Relative performance comparison
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17644364395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TVT.2004.842459
DO - 10.1109/TVT.2004.842459
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:17644364395
VL - 54
SP - 687
EP - 708
JO - IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
JF - IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
SN - 0018-9545
IS - 2
ER -