Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Aufsatznummer | 101273 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Ecosystem Services |
| Jahrgang | 2021 |
| Ausgabenummer | 49 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 22 Apr. 2021 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Juni 2021 |
Abstract
This paper presents a summary of lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services (ES) approach into urban planning practice in different European urban settings. We summarise a survey co-created with, and presented to, researchers and end-users in city administrations from ten European case study cities. To complement the expert analysis, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted among stakeholders to assess the use of ES in practice in urban settings. There was strong agreement between scientists and practitioners on both the opportunities and the barriers to uptake the ES concept in urban planning practice. Key agreements were that the ES concept supports decision-making as well as spatial planning, it is most useful as a communication tool, and monetarisation and public pressure can be considered as promoting factors. Barriers are lack of evidence including case studies, standardised methods and criteria to evaluate nature and its benefits, lack of legislations/reform, limited capacity and reluctance to apply ES in planning practice, and limited public involvement. On individual aspects, such as the monetarisation of ES, views differed both among the scientists and the practitioners. Derived from our investigations we summarize in which circumstances the ES concept is most relevant and useful for urban planners and decision-makers.
Schlagwörter
- Ökosystemleistungen
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Geografie, Planung und Entwicklung
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Natur- und Landschaftsschutz
- Agrar- und Biowissenschaften (insg.)
- Agrar- und Biowissenschaften (sonstige)
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Management, Monitoring, Politik und Recht
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Globaler Wandel
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Ökologie
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Ecosystem Services, Jahrgang 2021, Nr. 49, 101273, 06.2021.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning
AU - Grunewald, Karsten
AU - Bastian, Olaf
AU - Louda, Jiri
AU - Arcidiacono, Andrea
AU - Brzoska , Patrycia
AU - Bue, Mathilde
AU - Cetin, Nuket Ipek
AU - Dworczyk, Claudia
AU - Dubová, Lenka
AU - Fitch, Alice
AU - Jones, Laurence
AU - La Rosa, Daniele
AU - Mascarenhas, André
AU - Ronchi, Silvia
AU - Schlaepfer, Martin
AU - Sikorska, Daria
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - This paper presents a summary of lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services (ES) approach into urban planning practice in different European urban settings. We summarise a survey co-created with, and presented to, researchers and end-users in city administrations from ten European case study cities. To complement the expert analysis, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted among stakeholders to assess the use of ES in practice in urban settings. There was strong agreement between scientists and practitioners on both the opportunities and the barriers to uptake the ES concept in urban planning practice. Key agreements were that the ES concept supports decision-making as well as spatial planning, it is most useful as a communication tool, and monetarisation and public pressure can be considered as promoting factors. Barriers are lack of evidence including case studies, standardised methods and criteria to evaluate nature and its benefits, lack of legislations/reform, limited capacity and reluctance to apply ES in planning practice, and limited public involvement. On individual aspects, such as the monetarisation of ES, views differed both among the scientists and the practitioners. Derived from our investigations we summarize in which circumstances the ES concept is most relevant and useful for urban planners and decision-makers.
AB - This paper presents a summary of lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services (ES) approach into urban planning practice in different European urban settings. We summarise a survey co-created with, and presented to, researchers and end-users in city administrations from ten European case study cities. To complement the expert analysis, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted among stakeholders to assess the use of ES in practice in urban settings. There was strong agreement between scientists and practitioners on both the opportunities and the barriers to uptake the ES concept in urban planning practice. Key agreements were that the ES concept supports decision-making as well as spatial planning, it is most useful as a communication tool, and monetarisation and public pressure can be considered as promoting factors. Barriers are lack of evidence including case studies, standardised methods and criteria to evaluate nature and its benefits, lack of legislations/reform, limited capacity and reluctance to apply ES in planning practice, and limited public involvement. On individual aspects, such as the monetarisation of ES, views differed both among the scientists and the practitioners. Derived from our investigations we summarize in which circumstances the ES concept is most relevant and useful for urban planners and decision-makers.
KW - Ökosystemleistungen
KW - Decision-making
KW - Green-blue infrastructure
KW - Practitioners’ perspective
KW - Scientists’ perspective
KW - Urban nature
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104645162&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273
M3 - Article
VL - 2021
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
SN - 2212-0416
IS - 49
M1 - 101273
ER -