Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | 112583 |
Seitenumfang | 14 |
Fachzeitschrift | Energy and Buildings |
Jahrgang | 277 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 22 Okt. 2022 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 15 Dez. 2022 |
Abstract
“What-if” questions are intuitively generated and commonly asked during the design process. Engineers and architects need to inherently conduct design decisions, progressing from one phase to another. They either use empirical domain experience, simulations, or data-driven methods to acquire consequential feedback. We take an example from an interdisciplinary domain of energy-efficient building design to argue that the current methods for decision support have limitations or deficiencies in four aspects: parametric independency identification, gaps in integrating knowledge-based and data-driven approaches, less explicit model interpretation, and ambiguous decision support boundaries. In this study, we first clarify the nature of dynamic experience in individuals and constant principal knowledge in design. Subsequently, we introduce causal inference into the domain. A four-step process is proposed to discover and analyze parametric dependencies in a mathematically rigorous and computationally efficient manner by identifying the causal diagram with interventions. The causal diagram provides a nexus for integrating domain knowledge with data-driven methods, providing interpretability and testability against the domain experience within the design space. Extracting causal structures from the data is close to the nature design reasoning process. As an illustration, we applied the properties of the proposed estimators through simulations. The paper concludes with a feasibility study demonstrating the proposed framework's realization.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Tief- und Ingenieurbau
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Bauwesen
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Maschinenbau
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Elektrotechnik und Elektronik
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Energy and Buildings, Jahrgang 277, 112583, 15.12.2022.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Introducing causal inference in the energy-efficient building design process
AU - Chen, Xia
AU - Abualdenien, Jimmy
AU - Mahan Singh, Manav
AU - Borrmann, André
AU - Geyer, Philipp
N1 - Funding Information: We gratefully acknowledge the German Research Foundation (DFG) support for funding the project under grant GE 1652/3-2 in the Researcher Unit FOR 2363.
PY - 2022/12/15
Y1 - 2022/12/15
N2 - “What-if” questions are intuitively generated and commonly asked during the design process. Engineers and architects need to inherently conduct design decisions, progressing from one phase to another. They either use empirical domain experience, simulations, or data-driven methods to acquire consequential feedback. We take an example from an interdisciplinary domain of energy-efficient building design to argue that the current methods for decision support have limitations or deficiencies in four aspects: parametric independency identification, gaps in integrating knowledge-based and data-driven approaches, less explicit model interpretation, and ambiguous decision support boundaries. In this study, we first clarify the nature of dynamic experience in individuals and constant principal knowledge in design. Subsequently, we introduce causal inference into the domain. A four-step process is proposed to discover and analyze parametric dependencies in a mathematically rigorous and computationally efficient manner by identifying the causal diagram with interventions. The causal diagram provides a nexus for integrating domain knowledge with data-driven methods, providing interpretability and testability against the domain experience within the design space. Extracting causal structures from the data is close to the nature design reasoning process. As an illustration, we applied the properties of the proposed estimators through simulations. The paper concludes with a feasibility study demonstrating the proposed framework's realization.
AB - “What-if” questions are intuitively generated and commonly asked during the design process. Engineers and architects need to inherently conduct design decisions, progressing from one phase to another. They either use empirical domain experience, simulations, or data-driven methods to acquire consequential feedback. We take an example from an interdisciplinary domain of energy-efficient building design to argue that the current methods for decision support have limitations or deficiencies in four aspects: parametric independency identification, gaps in integrating knowledge-based and data-driven approaches, less explicit model interpretation, and ambiguous decision support boundaries. In this study, we first clarify the nature of dynamic experience in individuals and constant principal knowledge in design. Subsequently, we introduce causal inference into the domain. A four-step process is proposed to discover and analyze parametric dependencies in a mathematically rigorous and computationally efficient manner by identifying the causal diagram with interventions. The causal diagram provides a nexus for integrating domain knowledge with data-driven methods, providing interpretability and testability against the domain experience within the design space. Extracting causal structures from the data is close to the nature design reasoning process. As an illustration, we applied the properties of the proposed estimators through simulations. The paper concludes with a feasibility study demonstrating the proposed framework's realization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140805424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10115
DO - 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10115
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140805424
VL - 277
JO - Energy and Buildings
JF - Energy and Buildings
SN - 0378-7788
M1 - 112583
ER -