How do the employment effects of job creation schemes differ with respect to the foregoing unemployment duration?

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Reinhard Hujer
  • Stephan L. Thomsen

Externe Organisationen

  • Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
  • Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
  • Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW) Mannheim
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)38-51
Seitenumfang14
FachzeitschriftLabour economics
Jahrgang17
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Juli 2009
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Based on new administrative data for Germany covering entrances into job creation schemes between July 2000 and May 2001, we evaluate the effects of this active labour market policy programme considering the timing of treatment in the individual unemployment spell. Applying propensity score matching in a dynamic setting where the time until treatment in the unemployment spell is stratified into quarters, regional (East and West Germany) as well as gender differences are considered in the estimation. The results in terms of employment present a heterogeneous, but disappointing picture. For West Germany, most of the estimates are insignificant at the end of the observation period, and only one positive exception could be established. In East Germany, none of the groups experiences an improvement of the labour market situation, but the employment chances tend to be reduced due to participation even 30 months after start of programmes.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

How do the employment effects of job creation schemes differ with respect to the foregoing unemployment duration? / Hujer, Reinhard; Thomsen, Stephan L.
in: Labour economics, Jahrgang 17, Nr. 1, 15.07.2009, S. 38-51.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{3b913a9747ac41e7a89414777d51b9af,
title = "How do the employment effects of job creation schemes differ with respect to the foregoing unemployment duration?",
abstract = "Based on new administrative data for Germany covering entrances into job creation schemes between July 2000 and May 2001, we evaluate the effects of this active labour market policy programme considering the timing of treatment in the individual unemployment spell. Applying propensity score matching in a dynamic setting where the time until treatment in the unemployment spell is stratified into quarters, regional (East and West Germany) as well as gender differences are considered in the estimation. The results in terms of employment present a heterogeneous, but disappointing picture. For West Germany, most of the estimates are insignificant at the end of the observation period, and only one positive exception could be established. In East Germany, none of the groups experiences an improvement of the labour market situation, but the employment chances tend to be reduced due to participation even 30 months after start of programmes.",
keywords = "Active labour market policy, Administrative data, Evaluation, Hidden bias, Job creation schemes, Propensity score matching",
author = "Reinhard Hujer and Thomsen, {Stephan L.}",
note = "Funding information: Stephan L. Thomsen thanks the Stifterverband f{\"u}r die Deutsche Wissenschaft (Claussen-Simon-Stiftung) for financial support. We thank two anonymous referees, Moshe Buchinsky, Bernd Fitzenberger, Whang-Sheng Lee, Jeff Smith, Michael Lechner, Henrik Winterhager, Marie Waller, Christopher Zeiss and the participants of the seminars at IZA, Bonn, ZEW, Mannheim, University of Frankfurt and University of Magdeburg for valuable comments. The paper has benefited from discussions at the Pentecost meeting of German Statistical Society, Hamburg, the conferences of the European Economic Association, Vienna, of the European Association of Labour Economists, Prague, of the German Statistical Association, Dresden, of the Verein f{\"u}r Socialpolitik, Bayreuth, and the 3rd Evaluation Conference of ZEW, Mannheim. We thank Steffen Kaimer and Melanie Stamm for help in the preparation of the data. Financial support of the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) within the project `Effects of Job Creation and Structural Adjustment Schemes' is gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are our own. ",
year = "2009",
month = jul,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.labeco.2009.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "38--51",
journal = "Labour economics",
issn = "0927-5371",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do the employment effects of job creation schemes differ with respect to the foregoing unemployment duration?

AU - Hujer, Reinhard

AU - Thomsen, Stephan L.

N1 - Funding information: Stephan L. Thomsen thanks the Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft (Claussen-Simon-Stiftung) for financial support. We thank two anonymous referees, Moshe Buchinsky, Bernd Fitzenberger, Whang-Sheng Lee, Jeff Smith, Michael Lechner, Henrik Winterhager, Marie Waller, Christopher Zeiss and the participants of the seminars at IZA, Bonn, ZEW, Mannheim, University of Frankfurt and University of Magdeburg for valuable comments. The paper has benefited from discussions at the Pentecost meeting of German Statistical Society, Hamburg, the conferences of the European Economic Association, Vienna, of the European Association of Labour Economists, Prague, of the German Statistical Association, Dresden, of the Verein für Socialpolitik, Bayreuth, and the 3rd Evaluation Conference of ZEW, Mannheim. We thank Steffen Kaimer and Melanie Stamm for help in the preparation of the data. Financial support of the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) within the project `Effects of Job Creation and Structural Adjustment Schemes' is gratefully acknowledged. All remaining errors are our own.

PY - 2009/7/15

Y1 - 2009/7/15

N2 - Based on new administrative data for Germany covering entrances into job creation schemes between July 2000 and May 2001, we evaluate the effects of this active labour market policy programme considering the timing of treatment in the individual unemployment spell. Applying propensity score matching in a dynamic setting where the time until treatment in the unemployment spell is stratified into quarters, regional (East and West Germany) as well as gender differences are considered in the estimation. The results in terms of employment present a heterogeneous, but disappointing picture. For West Germany, most of the estimates are insignificant at the end of the observation period, and only one positive exception could be established. In East Germany, none of the groups experiences an improvement of the labour market situation, but the employment chances tend to be reduced due to participation even 30 months after start of programmes.

AB - Based on new administrative data for Germany covering entrances into job creation schemes between July 2000 and May 2001, we evaluate the effects of this active labour market policy programme considering the timing of treatment in the individual unemployment spell. Applying propensity score matching in a dynamic setting where the time until treatment in the unemployment spell is stratified into quarters, regional (East and West Germany) as well as gender differences are considered in the estimation. The results in terms of employment present a heterogeneous, but disappointing picture. For West Germany, most of the estimates are insignificant at the end of the observation period, and only one positive exception could be established. In East Germany, none of the groups experiences an improvement of the labour market situation, but the employment chances tend to be reduced due to participation even 30 months after start of programmes.

KW - Active labour market policy

KW - Administrative data

KW - Evaluation

KW - Hidden bias

KW - Job creation schemes

KW - Propensity score matching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73649128324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.07.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:73649128324

VL - 17

SP - 38

EP - 51

JO - Labour economics

JF - Labour economics

SN - 0927-5371

IS - 1

ER -