Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | 105364 |
Seitenumfang | 21 |
Fachzeitschrift | Computers & education |
Jahrgang | 236 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 21 Mai 2025 |
Publikationsstatus | Elektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 21 Mai 2025 |
Abstract
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Informatik (insg.)
- Allgemeine Computerwissenschaft
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
- Ausbildung bzw. Denomination
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Computers & education, Jahrgang 236, 105364, 10.2025.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - High Scaffolding of an Unfamiliar Strategy Improves Conceptual Learning but Reduces Enjoyment Compared to Low Scaffolding and Strategy Freedom
AU - Borchers, Conrad
AU - Fleischer, Hendrik
AU - Schanze, Sascha
AU - Scheiter, Katharina
AU - Aleven, Vincent
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/5/21
Y1 - 2025/5/21
N2 - Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.
AB - Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.
KW - Higher education
KW - Scaffolding
KW - Stoichiometry
KW - Strategy learning
KW - Tutoring systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005850248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105364
DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105364
M3 - Article
VL - 236
JO - Computers & education
JF - Computers & education
SN - 0360-1315
M1 - 105364
ER -