Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

High Scaffolding of an Unfamiliar Strategy Improves Conceptual Learning but Reduces Enjoyment Compared to Low Scaffolding and Strategy Freedom

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Universität Potsdam

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer105364
Seitenumfang21
FachzeitschriftComputers & education
Jahrgang236
Frühes Online-Datum21 Mai 2025
PublikationsstatusElektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 21 Mai 2025

Abstract

Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

High Scaffolding of an Unfamiliar Strategy Improves Conceptual Learning but Reduces Enjoyment Compared to Low Scaffolding and Strategy Freedom. / Borchers, Conrad; Fleischer, Hendrik; Schanze, Sascha et al.
in: Computers & education, Jahrgang 236, 105364, 10.2025.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{ba5681ceb5b040249f991e61945e768f,
title = "High Scaffolding of an Unfamiliar Strategy Improves Conceptual Learning but Reduces Enjoyment Compared to Low Scaffolding and Strategy Freedom",
abstract = "Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.",
keywords = "Higher education, Scaffolding, Stoichiometry, Strategy learning, Tutoring systems",
author = "Conrad Borchers and Hendrik Fleischer and Sascha Schanze and Katharina Scheiter and Vincent Aleven",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Authors",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105364",
language = "English",
volume = "236",
journal = "Computers & education",
issn = "0360-1315",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - High Scaffolding of an Unfamiliar Strategy Improves Conceptual Learning but Reduces Enjoyment Compared to Low Scaffolding and Strategy Freedom

AU - Borchers, Conrad

AU - Fleischer, Hendrik

AU - Schanze, Sascha

AU - Scheiter, Katharina

AU - Aleven, Vincent

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors

PY - 2025/5/21

Y1 - 2025/5/21

N2 - Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.

AB - Adaptive learning systems support students in acquiring complex skills, provided they deliver appropriate instructional support, such as scaffolding. Few studies have examined whether the optimal level of scaffolding depends on the system's support for strategies familiar to the learner—a situation that often arises when students use software developed abroad or aligned with a different curriculum. The present study experimentally compared learning outcomes from two American tutoring systems, StoichTutor and ORCCA, which provide differing levels of scaffolding, in a German population. Prior research predicts that learners would benefit more from a system with flexible support of their native problem-solving approach but provides less scaffolding. To test this prediction, we conducted a crossover experiment involving 61 German undergraduates enrolled in remedial first-year university chemistry preparatory courses. Procedural and conceptual learning were evaluated alongside self-efficacy and usability perceptions. Both tutoring systems significantly promoted procedural learning. However, only the highly scaffolded tutoring system yielded significant conceptual learning gains. Log data analysis revealed that the highly scaffolded system provided more opportunities for students to practice and receive feedback on unit analysis and substance operations. These opportunities corresponded to condition-specific learning gain differences in the underlying conceptual skills. Students significantly preferred working with the highly scaffolded system. These findings suggest that highly scaffolded systems can improve conceptual understanding, even when learners are unfamiliar with the scaffolded strategy. The practical significance of this finding is that, adapting tutoring systems outside of the United States, language translation may suffice to benefit novice learners through scaffolded, adaptive instruction.

KW - Higher education

KW - Scaffolding

KW - Stoichiometry

KW - Strategy learning

KW - Tutoring systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005850248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105364

DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105364

M3 - Article

VL - 236

JO - Computers & education

JF - Computers & education

SN - 0360-1315

M1 - 105364

ER -

Von denselben Autoren