Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Qualifikation | Doctor iuris |
Gradverleihende Hochschule | |
Betreut von |
|
Datum der Verleihung des Grades | 7 März 2024 |
Erscheinungsort | Hannover |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 6 März 2025 |
Abstract
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
Hannover, 2025. 307 S.
Publikation: Qualifikations-/Studienabschlussarbeit › Dissertation
}
TY - BOOK
T1 - Health data in a system of intellectual property rights
AU - Lishchuk, Iryna
PY - 2025/3/6
Y1 - 2025/3/6
N2 - The concept of data sharing is beautiful. It is particularly true in relation to health data – a resource of high economic value for the policymaking, patient safety and innovation. As the GDPR created avenues for the processing of personal health data for research, it gave rise to data-driven innovation and creation of data-driven outputs protectable by IP rights. In particular, sui generis rights in databases, software copyrights, data generating patents and the legal regime of undisclosed information are or relevance. As a reward for innovation, the R&D obtain exclusive IP rights protecting data-driven R&D outcomes, economic and exclusive by nature. By contrast, due to the nature of health data as personal data, the data holders from the medical sector, who provide health data into research do not have any property-like or exclusive legal rights in data as such and cannot exchange such rights against IP rights in data-driven outcomes to reward subjects who agreed to share the data. From economic perspective, when property rights in a resource of high economic value are not defined or ill-defined, the holder of de facto exclusivity over a resource will be able to effectuate de facto property rights in the resource and exchange such rights by a contract. Against the given legal and economic background, the thesis examines the legal premises on which the data holders, who by virtue of technical and contractual means, can ensure factual exclusivity over the health data sets, effectuate de facto exclusive rights and share into R&D by virtue of untrue licenses. The thesis explores and proposes the contractual reciprocal data sharing model “data as untrue license against IP license in data-driven R&D outcomes” in analogy to cross-licensing in IP law. In the context of the creation of the European Health Data Space, what should lower the transaction costs, once the rights formed in relation to health data are clearly distinct and assignable, shall according to Coase theorem render the efficient allocation of health data as a resource between medical sector and R&D.
AB - The concept of data sharing is beautiful. It is particularly true in relation to health data – a resource of high economic value for the policymaking, patient safety and innovation. As the GDPR created avenues for the processing of personal health data for research, it gave rise to data-driven innovation and creation of data-driven outputs protectable by IP rights. In particular, sui generis rights in databases, software copyrights, data generating patents and the legal regime of undisclosed information are or relevance. As a reward for innovation, the R&D obtain exclusive IP rights protecting data-driven R&D outcomes, economic and exclusive by nature. By contrast, due to the nature of health data as personal data, the data holders from the medical sector, who provide health data into research do not have any property-like or exclusive legal rights in data as such and cannot exchange such rights against IP rights in data-driven outcomes to reward subjects who agreed to share the data. From economic perspective, when property rights in a resource of high economic value are not defined or ill-defined, the holder of de facto exclusivity over a resource will be able to effectuate de facto property rights in the resource and exchange such rights by a contract. Against the given legal and economic background, the thesis examines the legal premises on which the data holders, who by virtue of technical and contractual means, can ensure factual exclusivity over the health data sets, effectuate de facto exclusive rights and share into R&D by virtue of untrue licenses. The thesis explores and proposes the contractual reciprocal data sharing model “data as untrue license against IP license in data-driven R&D outcomes” in analogy to cross-licensing in IP law. In the context of the creation of the European Health Data Space, what should lower the transaction costs, once the rights formed in relation to health data are clearly distinct and assignable, shall according to Coase theorem render the efficient allocation of health data as a resource between medical sector and R&D.
U2 - 10.15488/18642
DO - 10.15488/18642
M3 - Doctoral thesis
CY - Hannover
ER -