Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | 129857 |
Fachzeitschrift | Construction and Building Materials |
Jahrgang | 364 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 18 Jan. 2023 |
Extern publiziert | Ja |
Abstract
This work is the first systematic study on the static behavior of adhesively-bonded Fe-SMA-to-steel joints in applications adopting iron-based Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs). In order to provide a better understanding on the mechanical behavior of the adhesively bonded joint, an experimental campaign was established, involving 24 lap-shear tests in a displacement-controlled loading regime. The test series includes two types of Fe-SMAs (non-prestrained and prestrained), three types of adhesives (SikaDur 30, Araldite 2015, and SikaPower 1277), and three different thickness values (0.5, 1, and 2 mm) for the adhesive. A digital image correlation (DIC) technique was employed to measure the full-field displacement and strain, which were then used to infer the shear behavior. The mechanical behavior was analyzed on the basis of the experimentally derived load–displacement curves, the shear stress profiles along the bond line, and the bond–slip curves; three stages were observed during the loading process of a bonded joint: (i) a linear stage, (ii) a damage accumulation stage, and (iii) a debonding propagation stage. The test results indicate that a more ductile adhesive or a thicker adhesive layer possess a higher fracture energy, leading to a greater bond capacity. The results were also compared against those from lap-shear tests on carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bonded joints. It is found that an Fe-SMA bond and a CFRP bond behave similarly when a linear adhesive is utilized; a nonlinear adhesive, however, results in significant mechanical differences between the two bonded joints, which merit individual analysis.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Tief- und Ingenieurbau
- Ingenieurwesen (insg.)
- Bauwesen
- Werkstoffwissenschaften (insg.)
- Allgemeine Materialwissenschaften
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Construction and Building Materials, Jahrgang 364, 129857, 18.01.2023.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental investigation on debonding behavior of Fe-SMA-to-steel joints
AU - Li, Lingzhen
AU - Wang, Wandong
AU - Chatzi, Eleni
AU - Ghafoori, Elyas
N1 - Funding Information: The first author would like to acknowledge the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for co-financing his PhD study. Sika AG and Huntsman GmbH are acknowledged to provide adhesives. The authors acknowledge the support from re-fer AG, Switzerland, in providing the Fe-SMA materials for this study. Thanks also go to the technical assistance from Empa technicians, Mr. Giovanni Saragoni, Mr. Slavko Tudor, and Mr. Robert Widmann. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/1/18
Y1 - 2023/1/18
N2 - This work is the first systematic study on the static behavior of adhesively-bonded Fe-SMA-to-steel joints in applications adopting iron-based Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs). In order to provide a better understanding on the mechanical behavior of the adhesively bonded joint, an experimental campaign was established, involving 24 lap-shear tests in a displacement-controlled loading regime. The test series includes two types of Fe-SMAs (non-prestrained and prestrained), three types of adhesives (SikaDur 30, Araldite 2015, and SikaPower 1277), and three different thickness values (0.5, 1, and 2 mm) for the adhesive. A digital image correlation (DIC) technique was employed to measure the full-field displacement and strain, which were then used to infer the shear behavior. The mechanical behavior was analyzed on the basis of the experimentally derived load–displacement curves, the shear stress profiles along the bond line, and the bond–slip curves; three stages were observed during the loading process of a bonded joint: (i) a linear stage, (ii) a damage accumulation stage, and (iii) a debonding propagation stage. The test results indicate that a more ductile adhesive or a thicker adhesive layer possess a higher fracture energy, leading to a greater bond capacity. The results were also compared against those from lap-shear tests on carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bonded joints. It is found that an Fe-SMA bond and a CFRP bond behave similarly when a linear adhesive is utilized; a nonlinear adhesive, however, results in significant mechanical differences between the two bonded joints, which merit individual analysis.
AB - This work is the first systematic study on the static behavior of adhesively-bonded Fe-SMA-to-steel joints in applications adopting iron-based Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs). In order to provide a better understanding on the mechanical behavior of the adhesively bonded joint, an experimental campaign was established, involving 24 lap-shear tests in a displacement-controlled loading regime. The test series includes two types of Fe-SMAs (non-prestrained and prestrained), three types of adhesives (SikaDur 30, Araldite 2015, and SikaPower 1277), and three different thickness values (0.5, 1, and 2 mm) for the adhesive. A digital image correlation (DIC) technique was employed to measure the full-field displacement and strain, which were then used to infer the shear behavior. The mechanical behavior was analyzed on the basis of the experimentally derived load–displacement curves, the shear stress profiles along the bond line, and the bond–slip curves; three stages were observed during the loading process of a bonded joint: (i) a linear stage, (ii) a damage accumulation stage, and (iii) a debonding propagation stage. The test results indicate that a more ductile adhesive or a thicker adhesive layer possess a higher fracture energy, leading to a greater bond capacity. The results were also compared against those from lap-shear tests on carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bonded joints. It is found that an Fe-SMA bond and a CFRP bond behave similarly when a linear adhesive is utilized; a nonlinear adhesive, however, results in significant mechanical differences between the two bonded joints, which merit individual analysis.
KW - Bond capacity
KW - Bond–slip behavior
KW - Debonding propagation
KW - Iron-based shape memory alloy (Fe-SMA)
KW - Steel strengthening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143778961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129857
DO - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129857
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85143778961
VL - 364
JO - Construction and Building Materials
JF - Construction and Building Materials
SN - 0950-0618
M1 - 129857
ER -