Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Titel des Sammelwerks | Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2016 |
| Herausgeber/-innen | Anna Papafragou, Daniel Grodner, Daniel Mirman, John C. Trueswell |
| Seiten | 129-134 |
| Seitenumfang | 6 |
| ISBN (elektronisch) | 9780991196739 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2016 |
| Veranstaltung | 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Recognizing and Representing Events, CogSci 2016 - Philadelphia, USA / Vereinigte Staaten Dauer: 10 Aug. 2016 → 13 Aug. 2016 |
Publikationsreihe
| Name | Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2016 |
|---|
Abstract
When finding a best explanation for observed symptoms a multitude of information has to be integrated and matched against explanations stored in memory. Although assumptions about ongoing memory processes can be derived from the process models, little process data exists that would allow to sufficiently test these assumptions. In order to explore memory processes in diagnostic reasoning, 29 participants were asked to solve a visual reasoning task (the Black Box paradigm) where critical information had to be retrieved from memory. This study focused on differentiating between processes that take place during the encoding and the evaluation of symptom information by comparing eye movement measures (the number of fixation and fixation duration per dwell). Results will be discussed in light of existing theories on sequential diagnostic reasoning. Further, it will be discussed to which extent eye movements can be informative about memory processes underlying sequential diagnostic reasoning.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Informatik (insg.)
- Artificial intelligence
- Informatik (insg.)
- Angewandte Informatik
- Informatik (insg.)
- Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion
- Neurowissenschaften (insg.)
- Kognitive Neurowissenschaft
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2016. Hrsg. / Anna Papafragou; Daniel Grodner; Daniel Mirman; John C. Trueswell. 2016. S. 129-134 (Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2016).
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/Konferenzband › Aufsatz in Konferenzband › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Differentiating between Encoding and Processing during Diagnostic Reasoning
T2 - 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
AU - Klichowicz, Anja
AU - Scholz, Agnes
AU - Strehlau, Sascha
AU - Krems, Josef F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2016. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - When finding a best explanation for observed symptoms a multitude of information has to be integrated and matched against explanations stored in memory. Although assumptions about ongoing memory processes can be derived from the process models, little process data exists that would allow to sufficiently test these assumptions. In order to explore memory processes in diagnostic reasoning, 29 participants were asked to solve a visual reasoning task (the Black Box paradigm) where critical information had to be retrieved from memory. This study focused on differentiating between processes that take place during the encoding and the evaluation of symptom information by comparing eye movement measures (the number of fixation and fixation duration per dwell). Results will be discussed in light of existing theories on sequential diagnostic reasoning. Further, it will be discussed to which extent eye movements can be informative about memory processes underlying sequential diagnostic reasoning.
AB - When finding a best explanation for observed symptoms a multitude of information has to be integrated and matched against explanations stored in memory. Although assumptions about ongoing memory processes can be derived from the process models, little process data exists that would allow to sufficiently test these assumptions. In order to explore memory processes in diagnostic reasoning, 29 participants were asked to solve a visual reasoning task (the Black Box paradigm) where critical information had to be retrieved from memory. This study focused on differentiating between processes that take place during the encoding and the evaluation of symptom information by comparing eye movement measures (the number of fixation and fixation duration per dwell). Results will be discussed in light of existing theories on sequential diagnostic reasoning. Further, it will be discussed to which extent eye movements can be informative about memory processes underlying sequential diagnostic reasoning.
KW - diagnostic reasoning
KW - encoding-processing differences
KW - eye tracking
KW - process tracing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023181945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85023181945
T3 - Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2016
SP - 129
EP - 134
BT - Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2016
A2 - Papafragou, Anna
A2 - Grodner, Daniel
A2 - Mirman, Daniel
A2 - Trueswell, John C.
Y2 - 10 August 2016 through 13 August 2016
ER -