Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 383-386 |
Seitenumfang | 4 |
Fachzeitschrift | Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science |
Jahrgang | 186 |
Ausgabenummer | 4 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 15 Juni 2023 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2 Aug. 2023 |
Abstract
Soil density fractionation is a common tool to separate organic matter of different function and turnover. But it has not been tested so far how much soil material is necessary to obtain reproducible results. A reduction of chemicals like polytungstate would further save valuable resources. Here, we show that soil weight reduction from 25 to 5 g was not significantly affecting fractionation results. Compared to the commonly used 10–25 g, this corresponds to a saving of resources of up to 80%.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Agrar- und Biowissenschaften (insg.)
- Bodenkunde
- Agrar- und Biowissenschaften (insg.)
- Pflanzenkunde
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Jahrgang 186, Nr. 4, 02.08.2023, S. 383-386.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Density fractionation reworked: Reduce material and costs
AU - Liebmann, Patrick
AU - Mewes, Ole
AU - Guggenberger, Georg
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to thank Leopold Sauheitl for helpful discussions about density fractionation and experimental design. Financial support for this work was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) within the framework of the Joint German-Czech Project ‘CRYOVULCAN—Vulnerability of carbon in Cryosols’, with the individual grant GU 406351. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
PY - 2023/8/2
Y1 - 2023/8/2
N2 - Soil density fractionation is a common tool to separate organic matter of different function and turnover. But it has not been tested so far how much soil material is necessary to obtain reproducible results. A reduction of chemicals like polytungstate would further save valuable resources. Here, we show that soil weight reduction from 25 to 5 g was not significantly affecting fractionation results. Compared to the commonly used 10–25 g, this corresponds to a saving of resources of up to 80%.
AB - Soil density fractionation is a common tool to separate organic matter of different function and turnover. But it has not been tested so far how much soil material is necessary to obtain reproducible results. A reduction of chemicals like polytungstate would further save valuable resources. Here, we show that soil weight reduction from 25 to 5 g was not significantly affecting fractionation results. Compared to the commonly used 10–25 g, this corresponds to a saving of resources of up to 80%.
KW - mineral-associated organic matter
KW - particulate organic matter
KW - sodium polytungstate
KW - soil fractions
KW - soil organic matter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161852480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jpln.202200330
DO - 10.1002/jpln.202200330
M3 - Article
VL - 186
SP - 383
EP - 386
JO - Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
JF - Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
SN - 1436-8730
IS - 4
ER -