Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Titel des Sammelwerks | Proceedings - 2022 IEEE/ACM Joint 16th International Conferenceon Software and System Processes and 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICSSP/ICGSE 2022 |
| Herausgeber (Verlag) | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) |
| Seiten | 34-44 |
| Seitenumfang | 11 |
| ISBN (elektronisch) | 9781450396745 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 19 Mai 2022 |
| Veranstaltung | 16th International Conferenceon Software and System Processes (ICSSP 2022) jointly held with the 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2022) - Virtual, Online, USA / Vereinigte Staaten Dauer: 19 Mai 2022 → 20 Mai 2022 Konferenznummer: 16 |
Publikationsreihe
| Name | ACM International Conference Proceeding Series |
|---|
Abstract
Companies often combine agile and plan-based methods to so-called hybrid development approaches to benefit from the advantages of both. Recent research highlights conflicts introduced when combining agile and plan-based approaches in the different phases of the software lifecycle. For example, using both agile and plan-based methods during the requirements engineering of a project requires a decision on how many requirements should be gathered up-front and how many can be gathered during the runtime of a project. These conflicts need to be solved in order to construct a successful development approach. In order to investigate why the conflicts exist, how they are addressed in industry, and how they are related to each other, we performed a multi-case interview study with 15 practitioners. Our results reveal that the conflicts exist because companies use plan-based approaches to structure their agile development and define spaces of freedom and flexibility at the same time. From this insight and our results, we derive a theory that shows how companies structure their development stepwise by defining frames.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Informatik (insg.)
- Software
- Informatik (insg.)
- Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion
- Informatik (insg.)
- Maschinelles Sehen und Mustererkennung
- Informatik (insg.)
- Computernetzwerke und -kommunikation
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
Proceedings - 2022 IEEE/ACM Joint 16th International Conferenceon Software and System Processes and 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICSSP/ICGSE 2022. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2022. S. 34-44 (ACM International Conference Proceeding Series).
Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/Konferenzband › Aufsatz in Konferenzband › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Defining Frames to Structure Agile Development in Hybrid Settings
T2 - 16th International Conferenceon Software and System Processes (ICSSP 2022) jointly held with the 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE 2022)
AU - Prenner, Nils
AU - Klünder, Jil
AU - Schneider, Kurt
N1 - Conference code: 16
PY - 2022/5/19
Y1 - 2022/5/19
N2 - Companies often combine agile and plan-based methods to so-called hybrid development approaches to benefit from the advantages of both. Recent research highlights conflicts introduced when combining agile and plan-based approaches in the different phases of the software lifecycle. For example, using both agile and plan-based methods during the requirements engineering of a project requires a decision on how many requirements should be gathered up-front and how many can be gathered during the runtime of a project. These conflicts need to be solved in order to construct a successful development approach. In order to investigate why the conflicts exist, how they are addressed in industry, and how they are related to each other, we performed a multi-case interview study with 15 practitioners. Our results reveal that the conflicts exist because companies use plan-based approaches to structure their agile development and define spaces of freedom and flexibility at the same time. From this insight and our results, we derive a theory that shows how companies structure their development stepwise by defining frames.
AB - Companies often combine agile and plan-based methods to so-called hybrid development approaches to benefit from the advantages of both. Recent research highlights conflicts introduced when combining agile and plan-based approaches in the different phases of the software lifecycle. For example, using both agile and plan-based methods during the requirements engineering of a project requires a decision on how many requirements should be gathered up-front and how many can be gathered during the runtime of a project. These conflicts need to be solved in order to construct a successful development approach. In order to investigate why the conflicts exist, how they are addressed in industry, and how they are related to each other, we performed a multi-case interview study with 15 practitioners. Our results reveal that the conflicts exist because companies use plan-based approaches to structure their agile development and define spaces of freedom and flexibility at the same time. From this insight and our results, we derive a theory that shows how companies structure their development stepwise by defining frames.
KW - agile development
KW - Hybrid development approaches
KW - multi-case interview study
KW - plan-based development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130786496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3529320.3529324
DO - 10.1145/3529320.3529324
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85130786496
T3 - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
SP - 34
EP - 44
BT - Proceedings - 2022 IEEE/ACM Joint 16th International Conferenceon Software and System Processes and 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, ICSSP/ICGSE 2022
PB - Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Y2 - 19 May 2022 through 20 May 2022
ER -