Why do people visit or avoid public green spaces? Insights from an online map-based survey in Bochum, Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum
  • University of Turku
  • Hochschule Geisenheim University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number2454252
JournalEcosystems and People
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date10 Feb 2025
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Abstract

Public green spaces (PGS) have the capacity to fulfil the needs and interests of diverse groups of urban dwellers and thus contribute to their well-being. However, PGS designers and managers usually lack spatially disaggregated information on how PGS is used, by whom, and for what reasons. This study aims to assess spatial PGS visitation and avoidance patterns and their respective determinants using the city of Bochum, Germany as a case study. The research design consists of the design and application of an online map-based survey (public participation GIS–PPGIS) targeting residents and subsequent statistical and spatial analyses. Survey data include 807 completed surveys with 1084 marked visited points and 329 marked avoided points across the study area. Our results show both spatial clusters and co-occurrence of PGS visitation and avoidance. Respondents visit and avoid PGS for different reasons, which are linked to societal determinants (e.g. exercising or resting and relaxing), physical determinants (e.g. amount of grassy area or presence of trash) and sociodemographic background. Although reasons for PGS visitation and avoidance show limited spatial variation across different PGS, we find variation when disaggregating by gender and age. Insights generated can provide useful guidance for urban planners and policy makers for prioritising design and management actions to address reasons for avoidance of PGS, enhance their perceived quality and benefits, and craft PGS management concepts that better address place-specific conditions and preferences of different sociodemographic groups.

Keywords

    connection to nature, Davide Geneletti, ecosystem services and disservices, public green spaces, Public participation GIS (PPGIS), urban green infrastructure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Why do people visit or avoid public green spaces? Insights from an online map-based survey in Bochum, Germany. / Romelli, Claudia; Anderson, Carl C.; Fagerholm, Nora et al.
In: Ecosystems and People, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2454252, 2025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Romelli C, Anderson CC, Fagerholm N, Hansen R, Albert C. Why do people visit or avoid public green spaces? Insights from an online map-based survey in Bochum, Germany. Ecosystems and People. 2025;21(1):2454252. Epub 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2025.2454252
Romelli, Claudia ; Anderson, Carl C. ; Fagerholm, Nora et al. / Why do people visit or avoid public green spaces? Insights from an online map-based survey in Bochum, Germany. In: Ecosystems and People. 2025 ; Vol. 21, No. 1.
Download
@article{793f1940ae834b03844680f5019d0b0e,
title = "Why do people visit or avoid public green spaces?: Insights from an online map-based survey in Bochum, Germany",
abstract = "Public green spaces (PGS) have the capacity to fulfil the needs and interests of diverse groups of urban dwellers and thus contribute to their well-being. However, PGS designers and managers usually lack spatially disaggregated information on how PGS is used, by whom, and for what reasons. This study aims to assess spatial PGS visitation and avoidance patterns and their respective determinants using the city of Bochum, Germany as a case study. The research design consists of the design and application of an online map-based survey (public participation GIS–PPGIS) targeting residents and subsequent statistical and spatial analyses. Survey data include 807 completed surveys with 1084 marked visited points and 329 marked avoided points across the study area. Our results show both spatial clusters and co-occurrence of PGS visitation and avoidance. Respondents visit and avoid PGS for different reasons, which are linked to societal determinants (e.g. exercising or resting and relaxing), physical determinants (e.g. amount of grassy area or presence of trash) and sociodemographic background. Although reasons for PGS visitation and avoidance show limited spatial variation across different PGS, we find variation when disaggregating by gender and age. Insights generated can provide useful guidance for urban planners and policy makers for prioritising design and management actions to address reasons for avoidance of PGS, enhance their perceived quality and benefits, and craft PGS management concepts that better address place-specific conditions and preferences of different sociodemographic groups.",
keywords = "connection to nature, Davide Geneletti, ecosystem services and disservices, public green spaces, Public participation GIS (PPGIS), urban green infrastructure",
author = "Claudia Romelli and Anderson, {Carl C.} and Nora Fagerholm and Rieke Hansen and Christian Albert",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.1080/26395916.2025.2454252",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "Ecosystems and People",
issn = "2639-5908",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why do people visit or avoid public green spaces?

T2 - Insights from an online map-based survey in Bochum, Germany

AU - Romelli, Claudia

AU - Anderson, Carl C.

AU - Fagerholm, Nora

AU - Hansen, Rieke

AU - Albert, Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - Public green spaces (PGS) have the capacity to fulfil the needs and interests of diverse groups of urban dwellers and thus contribute to their well-being. However, PGS designers and managers usually lack spatially disaggregated information on how PGS is used, by whom, and for what reasons. This study aims to assess spatial PGS visitation and avoidance patterns and their respective determinants using the city of Bochum, Germany as a case study. The research design consists of the design and application of an online map-based survey (public participation GIS–PPGIS) targeting residents and subsequent statistical and spatial analyses. Survey data include 807 completed surveys with 1084 marked visited points and 329 marked avoided points across the study area. Our results show both spatial clusters and co-occurrence of PGS visitation and avoidance. Respondents visit and avoid PGS for different reasons, which are linked to societal determinants (e.g. exercising or resting and relaxing), physical determinants (e.g. amount of grassy area or presence of trash) and sociodemographic background. Although reasons for PGS visitation and avoidance show limited spatial variation across different PGS, we find variation when disaggregating by gender and age. Insights generated can provide useful guidance for urban planners and policy makers for prioritising design and management actions to address reasons for avoidance of PGS, enhance their perceived quality and benefits, and craft PGS management concepts that better address place-specific conditions and preferences of different sociodemographic groups.

AB - Public green spaces (PGS) have the capacity to fulfil the needs and interests of diverse groups of urban dwellers and thus contribute to their well-being. However, PGS designers and managers usually lack spatially disaggregated information on how PGS is used, by whom, and for what reasons. This study aims to assess spatial PGS visitation and avoidance patterns and their respective determinants using the city of Bochum, Germany as a case study. The research design consists of the design and application of an online map-based survey (public participation GIS–PPGIS) targeting residents and subsequent statistical and spatial analyses. Survey data include 807 completed surveys with 1084 marked visited points and 329 marked avoided points across the study area. Our results show both spatial clusters and co-occurrence of PGS visitation and avoidance. Respondents visit and avoid PGS for different reasons, which are linked to societal determinants (e.g. exercising or resting and relaxing), physical determinants (e.g. amount of grassy area or presence of trash) and sociodemographic background. Although reasons for PGS visitation and avoidance show limited spatial variation across different PGS, we find variation when disaggregating by gender and age. Insights generated can provide useful guidance for urban planners and policy makers for prioritising design and management actions to address reasons for avoidance of PGS, enhance their perceived quality and benefits, and craft PGS management concepts that better address place-specific conditions and preferences of different sociodemographic groups.

KW - connection to nature

KW - Davide Geneletti

KW - ecosystem services and disservices

KW - public green spaces

KW - Public participation GIS (PPGIS)

KW - urban green infrastructure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217866161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/26395916.2025.2454252

DO - 10.1080/26395916.2025.2454252

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85217866161

VL - 21

JO - Ecosystems and People

JF - Ecosystems and People

SN - 2639-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 2454252

ER -

By the same author(s)