Sessile drop contact angle method

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Universidad Austral de Chile
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSoil Water Repellency
Subtitle of host publicationOccurrence, Consequences, and Amelioration
PublisherElsevier Inc.
Pages57-65
Number of pages9
ISBN (print)9780444512697
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

Abstract

Existing methods for determining the contact angle as a measure of the water repellency of soils are either indirect, or cumbersome and time-consuming. Our objective was to develop a new method that is simpler than the existing procedures like the capillary rise method and that still yields accurate and reproducible results. To this end, w e applied the so-called sessile drop method. To obtain the needed plane sample surface and to reduce geometrical effects, a single layer of air-dry soil particles is sprinkled on double-sided adhesive tape. Eight droplets of deionized water are placed carefully on this horizontal particle layer. Immediately after sample preparation, the contact angle at the three-phase boundary was measured with a goniometer-fitted microscope. In order to test the new method, contact angle measurements were carried out with wettable soil material that was hydrophobized, and with soils showing a wide range of natural water repellency. Both wettable silt and sand were made hydrophobic with Dimethyldichlorosilane and diluted with untreated soil to obtain a defined variation in the solid surface tension. Contact angle measurements showed a nonlinear decrease with increasing amounts of wettable particles in the 40-90 contact angle domain. Generally, the contact angle decrease was predictable and could be described with an empirical model. For volcanic ash soils showing a wide range of repellency, the contact angles of different, narrowly sieved soils fractions ( 220-38,38-63 and 63-100 ) were within the range of 25-110. The impact of the different sieved soil fractions on the contact angles was found to be small. Measurements performed with independent replicates showed good reproducibility across the whole range of contact angles.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Sessile drop contact angle method. / Bachmann, J.; Ellies, A.; Hartge, K. H.
Soil Water Repellency: Occurrence, Consequences, and Amelioration. Elsevier Inc., 2003. p. 57-65.

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingContribution to book/anthologyResearchpeer review

Bachmann, J, Ellies, A & Hartge, KH 2003, Sessile drop contact angle method. in Soil Water Repellency: Occurrence, Consequences, and Amelioration. Elsevier Inc., pp. 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51269-7.50008-4
Bachmann, J., Ellies, A., & Hartge, K. H. (2003). Sessile drop contact angle method. In Soil Water Repellency: Occurrence, Consequences, and Amelioration (pp. 57-65). Elsevier Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-51269-7.50008-4
Bachmann J, Ellies A, Hartge KH. Sessile drop contact angle method. In Soil Water Repellency: Occurrence, Consequences, and Amelioration. Elsevier Inc. 2003. p. 57-65 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-51269-7.50008-4
Bachmann, J. ; Ellies, A. ; Hartge, K. H. / Sessile drop contact angle method. Soil Water Repellency: Occurrence, Consequences, and Amelioration. Elsevier Inc., 2003. pp. 57-65
Download
@inbook{72b052ec03b84e138e6a7093730a1663,
title = "Sessile drop contact angle method",
abstract = "Existing methods for determining the contact angle as a measure of the water repellency of soils are either indirect, or cumbersome and time-consuming. Our objective was to develop a new method that is simpler than the existing procedures like the capillary rise method and that still yields accurate and reproducible results. To this end, w e applied the so-called sessile drop method. To obtain the needed plane sample surface and to reduce geometrical effects, a single layer of air-dry soil particles is sprinkled on double-sided adhesive tape. Eight droplets of deionized water are placed carefully on this horizontal particle layer. Immediately after sample preparation, the contact angle at the three-phase boundary was measured with a goniometer-fitted microscope. In order to test the new method, contact angle measurements were carried out with wettable soil material that was hydrophobized, and with soils showing a wide range of natural water repellency. Both wettable silt and sand were made hydrophobic with Dimethyldichlorosilane and diluted with untreated soil to obtain a defined variation in the solid surface tension. Contact angle measurements showed a nonlinear decrease with increasing amounts of wettable particles in the 40-90 contact angle domain. Generally, the contact angle decrease was predictable and could be described with an empirical model. For volcanic ash soils showing a wide range of repellency, the contact angles of different, narrowly sieved soils fractions ( 220-38,38-63 and 63-100 ) were within the range of 25-110. The impact of the different sieved soil fractions on the contact angles was found to be small. Measurements performed with independent replicates showed good reproducibility across the whole range of contact angles.",
author = "J. Bachmann and A. Ellies and Hartge, {K. H.}",
note = "Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2003",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-444-51269-7.50008-4",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780444512697",
pages = "57--65",
booktitle = "Soil Water Repellency",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sessile drop contact angle method

AU - Bachmann, J.

AU - Ellies, A.

AU - Hartge, K. H.

N1 - Copyright: Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2003/4

Y1 - 2003/4

N2 - Existing methods for determining the contact angle as a measure of the water repellency of soils are either indirect, or cumbersome and time-consuming. Our objective was to develop a new method that is simpler than the existing procedures like the capillary rise method and that still yields accurate and reproducible results. To this end, w e applied the so-called sessile drop method. To obtain the needed plane sample surface and to reduce geometrical effects, a single layer of air-dry soil particles is sprinkled on double-sided adhesive tape. Eight droplets of deionized water are placed carefully on this horizontal particle layer. Immediately after sample preparation, the contact angle at the three-phase boundary was measured with a goniometer-fitted microscope. In order to test the new method, contact angle measurements were carried out with wettable soil material that was hydrophobized, and with soils showing a wide range of natural water repellency. Both wettable silt and sand were made hydrophobic with Dimethyldichlorosilane and diluted with untreated soil to obtain a defined variation in the solid surface tension. Contact angle measurements showed a nonlinear decrease with increasing amounts of wettable particles in the 40-90 contact angle domain. Generally, the contact angle decrease was predictable and could be described with an empirical model. For volcanic ash soils showing a wide range of repellency, the contact angles of different, narrowly sieved soils fractions ( 220-38,38-63 and 63-100 ) were within the range of 25-110. The impact of the different sieved soil fractions on the contact angles was found to be small. Measurements performed with independent replicates showed good reproducibility across the whole range of contact angles.

AB - Existing methods for determining the contact angle as a measure of the water repellency of soils are either indirect, or cumbersome and time-consuming. Our objective was to develop a new method that is simpler than the existing procedures like the capillary rise method and that still yields accurate and reproducible results. To this end, w e applied the so-called sessile drop method. To obtain the needed plane sample surface and to reduce geometrical effects, a single layer of air-dry soil particles is sprinkled on double-sided adhesive tape. Eight droplets of deionized water are placed carefully on this horizontal particle layer. Immediately after sample preparation, the contact angle at the three-phase boundary was measured with a goniometer-fitted microscope. In order to test the new method, contact angle measurements were carried out with wettable soil material that was hydrophobized, and with soils showing a wide range of natural water repellency. Both wettable silt and sand were made hydrophobic with Dimethyldichlorosilane and diluted with untreated soil to obtain a defined variation in the solid surface tension. Contact angle measurements showed a nonlinear decrease with increasing amounts of wettable particles in the 40-90 contact angle domain. Generally, the contact angle decrease was predictable and could be described with an empirical model. For volcanic ash soils showing a wide range of repellency, the contact angles of different, narrowly sieved soils fractions ( 220-38,38-63 and 63-100 ) were within the range of 25-110. The impact of the different sieved soil fractions on the contact angles was found to be small. Measurements performed with independent replicates showed good reproducibility across the whole range of contact angles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344441803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-444-51269-7.50008-4

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-444-51269-7.50008-4

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

AN - SCOPUS:21344441803

SN - 9780444512697

SP - 57

EP - 65

BT - Soil Water Repellency

PB - Elsevier Inc.

ER -

By the same author(s)