Revisiting multi-phase field model for FRCs using Puck theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • TU Wien (TUW)
  • Sudan University of Science and Technology (SUST)
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number119549
JournalComposite Structures
Volume372
Early online date11 Aug 2025
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2025

Abstract

This article aims to revisit the multi-phase field model using the Puck failure criteria for Fiber-Reinforced Composites (FRCs). Specifically, this work proposes a robust multi-phase field formulation relying on the Puck failure criteria for triggering the fracture in fiber and the inter-fiber (matrix-dominated) separately, using two independent phase-field damage variables in a thermodynamically consistent framework. Furthermore, the formulation encompasses two distinct characteristic length scales, and a structural tensor is employed to penalize the gradient of the phase field, enhancing the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative predictions. Seven benchmark examples of unidirectional reinforced composites are utilized to demonstrate the model's predictive capabilities. The first four examples compare the proposed model with experimental results stemming from the related literature. In particular, the crack propagation with different fiber orientations, including the extreme cases involving fiber orientated parallel to the loading direction leading to debonding along the matrix and fiber interface are presented for each case. Furthermore, the last three examples serve as benchmarks to further validate the model's predictive capability. The unnotched tension specimens are examined to evaluate the effects of defects/voids on crack propagation in the FRCs in various ply orientations.

Keywords

    A. Multi-phase field, B. FRC, C. Phase-field method, D. ABAQUS UEL, E. Fracture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Revisiting multi-phase field model for FRCs using Puck theory. / Asur Vijaya Kumar, Pavan Kumar; Fleischhacker, Rafael; Dean, Aamir et al.
In: Composite Structures, Vol. 372, 119549, 15.11.2025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Asur Vijaya Kumar PK, Fleischhacker R, Dean A, Rolfes R, Pettermann HE. Revisiting multi-phase field model for FRCs using Puck theory. Composite Structures. 2025 Nov 15;372:119549. Epub 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119549
Asur Vijaya Kumar, Pavan Kumar ; Fleischhacker, Rafael ; Dean, Aamir et al. / Revisiting multi-phase field model for FRCs using Puck theory. In: Composite Structures. 2025 ; Vol. 372.
Download
@article{c1d05b0dc39348c7ac47fe66e08a5fb5,
title = "Revisiting multi-phase field model for FRCs using Puck theory",
abstract = "This article aims to revisit the multi-phase field model using the Puck failure criteria for Fiber-Reinforced Composites (FRCs). Specifically, this work proposes a robust multi-phase field formulation relying on the Puck failure criteria for triggering the fracture in fiber and the inter-fiber (matrix-dominated) separately, using two independent phase-field damage variables in a thermodynamically consistent framework. Furthermore, the formulation encompasses two distinct characteristic length scales, and a structural tensor is employed to penalize the gradient of the phase field, enhancing the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative predictions. Seven benchmark examples of unidirectional reinforced composites are utilized to demonstrate the model's predictive capabilities. The first four examples compare the proposed model with experimental results stemming from the related literature. In particular, the crack propagation with different fiber orientations, including the extreme cases involving fiber orientated parallel to the loading direction leading to debonding along the matrix and fiber interface are presented for each case. Furthermore, the last three examples serve as benchmarks to further validate the model's predictive capability. The unnotched tension specimens are examined to evaluate the effects of defects/voids on crack propagation in the FRCs in various ply orientations.",
keywords = "A. Multi-phase field, B. FRC, C. Phase-field method, D. ABAQUS UEL, E. Fracture",
author = "{Asur Vijaya Kumar}, {Pavan Kumar} and Rafael Fleischhacker and Aamir Dean and Raimund Rolfes and Pettermann, {Heinz E.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Authors",
year = "2025",
month = nov,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119549",
language = "English",
volume = "372",
journal = "Composite Structures",
issn = "0263-8223",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting multi-phase field model for FRCs using Puck theory

AU - Asur Vijaya Kumar, Pavan Kumar

AU - Fleischhacker, Rafael

AU - Dean, Aamir

AU - Rolfes, Raimund

AU - Pettermann, Heinz E.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors

PY - 2025/11/15

Y1 - 2025/11/15

N2 - This article aims to revisit the multi-phase field model using the Puck failure criteria for Fiber-Reinforced Composites (FRCs). Specifically, this work proposes a robust multi-phase field formulation relying on the Puck failure criteria for triggering the fracture in fiber and the inter-fiber (matrix-dominated) separately, using two independent phase-field damage variables in a thermodynamically consistent framework. Furthermore, the formulation encompasses two distinct characteristic length scales, and a structural tensor is employed to penalize the gradient of the phase field, enhancing the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative predictions. Seven benchmark examples of unidirectional reinforced composites are utilized to demonstrate the model's predictive capabilities. The first four examples compare the proposed model with experimental results stemming from the related literature. In particular, the crack propagation with different fiber orientations, including the extreme cases involving fiber orientated parallel to the loading direction leading to debonding along the matrix and fiber interface are presented for each case. Furthermore, the last three examples serve as benchmarks to further validate the model's predictive capability. The unnotched tension specimens are examined to evaluate the effects of defects/voids on crack propagation in the FRCs in various ply orientations.

AB - This article aims to revisit the multi-phase field model using the Puck failure criteria for Fiber-Reinforced Composites (FRCs). Specifically, this work proposes a robust multi-phase field formulation relying on the Puck failure criteria for triggering the fracture in fiber and the inter-fiber (matrix-dominated) separately, using two independent phase-field damage variables in a thermodynamically consistent framework. Furthermore, the formulation encompasses two distinct characteristic length scales, and a structural tensor is employed to penalize the gradient of the phase field, enhancing the accuracy of qualitative and quantitative predictions. Seven benchmark examples of unidirectional reinforced composites are utilized to demonstrate the model's predictive capabilities. The first four examples compare the proposed model with experimental results stemming from the related literature. In particular, the crack propagation with different fiber orientations, including the extreme cases involving fiber orientated parallel to the loading direction leading to debonding along the matrix and fiber interface are presented for each case. Furthermore, the last three examples serve as benchmarks to further validate the model's predictive capability. The unnotched tension specimens are examined to evaluate the effects of defects/voids on crack propagation in the FRCs in various ply orientations.

KW - A. Multi-phase field

KW - B. FRC

KW - C. Phase-field method

KW - D. ABAQUS UEL

KW - E. Fracture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105013287681&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119549

DO - 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119549

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105013287681

VL - 372

JO - Composite Structures

JF - Composite Structures

SN - 0263-8223

M1 - 119549

ER -

By the same author(s)