Details
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 7-35 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Indian Journal of Labour Economics |
Volume | 66 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 19 Apr 2023 |
Abstract
This paper uses Indian EUS-NSSO data on 32 states/union territories and 570 districts for a bi-annual panel with 5 waves to estimate how regional population reacts to asymmetric shocks. These shocks are measured by non-employment rates, unemployment rates, and wages in fixed-effects regressions which effectively use changes in these indicators over time within regions as identifying information. Because we include region and time effects, we interpret regression-adjusted population changes as proxies for regional migration. Comparing the results with those for the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), the most striking difference is that, in India, we do not find any significant reactions to asymmetric non-employment shocks at the state level, only at the district level, whereas the estimates are statistically significant and of similar size for the state/NUTS-1 (Classification of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS, the French abbreviation for "nomenclature d’unités territoriales 21 statistiques")) and district level in both the US and Europe. We find that Indian workers react to asymmetric regional shocks by adjusting up to a third of a regional non-employment shock through migration within 2 years. This is somewhat higher than the response to non-employment shocks in the US and the EU but somewhat lower than the response to unemployment shocks in these economies. In India, the unemployment rate does not seem to be a reliable measure of regional shocks, at least we find no significant effects for it. However, we find a significant population response to regional wage differentials in India at both the state and district level.
Keywords
- Migration, Non-employment, Population, Regional convergence, Unemployment, Wages
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
- Economics and Econometrics
Sustainable Development Goals
Cite this
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTeX
- RIS
In: Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 66, No. 1, 19.04.2023, p. 7-35.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Population Adjustment to Asymmetric Labour Market Shocks in India
T2 - A Comparison to Europe and the United States at Two Different Regional Levels
AU - Braschke, Franziska
AU - Puhani, Patrick A.
N1 - Funding Information: We thank Himanshu, Balwant Mehta, Priyanka Tyagi, employees of the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) and participants at the 2022 Annual Conference of the Indian Society of Labour Economists for helpful comments. Both authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The project has not been funded by resources external to our own university. A previous version of this article has been issued as a discussion paper, see Braschke and Puhani (2022 ), for example.
PY - 2023/4/19
Y1 - 2023/4/19
N2 - This paper uses Indian EUS-NSSO data on 32 states/union territories and 570 districts for a bi-annual panel with 5 waves to estimate how regional population reacts to asymmetric shocks. These shocks are measured by non-employment rates, unemployment rates, and wages in fixed-effects regressions which effectively use changes in these indicators over time within regions as identifying information. Because we include region and time effects, we interpret regression-adjusted population changes as proxies for regional migration. Comparing the results with those for the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), the most striking difference is that, in India, we do not find any significant reactions to asymmetric non-employment shocks at the state level, only at the district level, whereas the estimates are statistically significant and of similar size for the state/NUTS-1 (Classification of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS, the French abbreviation for "nomenclature d’unités territoriales 21 statistiques")) and district level in both the US and Europe. We find that Indian workers react to asymmetric regional shocks by adjusting up to a third of a regional non-employment shock through migration within 2 years. This is somewhat higher than the response to non-employment shocks in the US and the EU but somewhat lower than the response to unemployment shocks in these economies. In India, the unemployment rate does not seem to be a reliable measure of regional shocks, at least we find no significant effects for it. However, we find a significant population response to regional wage differentials in India at both the state and district level.
AB - This paper uses Indian EUS-NSSO data on 32 states/union territories and 570 districts for a bi-annual panel with 5 waves to estimate how regional population reacts to asymmetric shocks. These shocks are measured by non-employment rates, unemployment rates, and wages in fixed-effects regressions which effectively use changes in these indicators over time within regions as identifying information. Because we include region and time effects, we interpret regression-adjusted population changes as proxies for regional migration. Comparing the results with those for the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), the most striking difference is that, in India, we do not find any significant reactions to asymmetric non-employment shocks at the state level, only at the district level, whereas the estimates are statistically significant and of similar size for the state/NUTS-1 (Classification of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS, the French abbreviation for "nomenclature d’unités territoriales 21 statistiques")) and district level in both the US and Europe. We find that Indian workers react to asymmetric regional shocks by adjusting up to a third of a regional non-employment shock through migration within 2 years. This is somewhat higher than the response to non-employment shocks in the US and the EU but somewhat lower than the response to unemployment shocks in these economies. In India, the unemployment rate does not seem to be a reliable measure of regional shocks, at least we find no significant effects for it. However, we find a significant population response to regional wage differentials in India at both the state and district level.
KW - Migration
KW - Non-employment
KW - Population
KW - Regional convergence
KW - Unemployment
KW - Wages
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153061387&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s41027-023-00432-x
DO - 10.1007/s41027-023-00432-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85153061387
VL - 66
SP - 7
EP - 35
JO - Indian Journal of Labour Economics
JF - Indian Journal of Labour Economics
SN - 0971-7927
IS - 1
ER -