Nudging travellers to societally favourable routes: The impact of visual communication and emotional responses on decision making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

External Research Organisations

  • Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number100829
JournalTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Volume19
Early online date28 Apr 2023
Publication statusPublished - May 2023

Abstract

As urbanisation increases, in many places, the transport system is suffering from problems that may affect large parts of the urban population, such as traffic congestion or increased air pollution. In both cases, a better distribution of traffic flows could contribute to establishing a more sustainable transport system, and to improve the situation from a societal point of view. In this paper, we use cartographic symbolisation for communicating favourability of route options for achieving a societal benefit. Since map symbols can evoke different emotional responses in the viewer, we investigate to which extent map symbols evoke positive and negative emotions and whether these influence route choice decision making. We created different cartographic visualisations and designed a user study that investigates the effectiveness and suitability of these different visualisation variants for influencing route choice based on two scenarios: traffic and air quality. Fourteen route maps were prepared using different map symbols to symbolise societally favourable and non-favourable route options. The results of this study show that map symbols can be used effectively for influencing route choice towards choosing the favourable route for the two tested scenarios. While visualisations that modify only lines were more effective in the traffic scenario, area symbol modifications were more effective for the air quality scenario. The symbolisation evoked a wide range of emotions in participants. While non-favourable routes mainly evoke negative emotions (particularly fear), favourable routes mainly evoked positive emotions (particularly contentment) or no emotions. The results further demonstrate that for some of the visualisation variants, emotions felt in response to the map visualisations contributed significantly to changing the route choice decisions in favour of the societally favourable route option. The findings of this research demonstrate the relationship between route choice behaviour and emotional responses elicited by map symbols.

Keywords

    Air quality, Emotions, Map symbolisation, Route choice, Traffic, Visual variables

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

Nudging travellers to societally favourable routes: The impact of visual communication and emotional responses on decision making. / Fuest, Stefan; Sester, Monika; Griffin, Amy L.
In: Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 19, 100829, 05.2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Fuest S, Sester M, Griffin AL. Nudging travellers to societally favourable routes: The impact of visual communication and emotional responses on decision making. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2023 May;19:100829. Epub 2023 Apr 28. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100829
Fuest, Stefan ; Sester, Monika ; Griffin, Amy L. / Nudging travellers to societally favourable routes : The impact of visual communication and emotional responses on decision making. In: Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2023 ; Vol. 19.
Download
@article{0dfcfb69cc9842bb9c39a69eeb9aed5c,
title = "Nudging travellers to societally favourable routes: The impact of visual communication and emotional responses on decision making",
abstract = "As urbanisation increases, in many places, the transport system is suffering from problems that may affect large parts of the urban population, such as traffic congestion or increased air pollution. In both cases, a better distribution of traffic flows could contribute to establishing a more sustainable transport system, and to improve the situation from a societal point of view. In this paper, we use cartographic symbolisation for communicating favourability of route options for achieving a societal benefit. Since map symbols can evoke different emotional responses in the viewer, we investigate to which extent map symbols evoke positive and negative emotions and whether these influence route choice decision making. We created different cartographic visualisations and designed a user study that investigates the effectiveness and suitability of these different visualisation variants for influencing route choice based on two scenarios: traffic and air quality. Fourteen route maps were prepared using different map symbols to symbolise societally favourable and non-favourable route options. The results of this study show that map symbols can be used effectively for influencing route choice towards choosing the favourable route for the two tested scenarios. While visualisations that modify only lines were more effective in the traffic scenario, area symbol modifications were more effective for the air quality scenario. The symbolisation evoked a wide range of emotions in participants. While non-favourable routes mainly evoke negative emotions (particularly fear), favourable routes mainly evoked positive emotions (particularly contentment) or no emotions. The results further demonstrate that for some of the visualisation variants, emotions felt in response to the map visualisations contributed significantly to changing the route choice decisions in favour of the societally favourable route option. The findings of this research demonstrate the relationship between route choice behaviour and emotional responses elicited by map symbols.",
keywords = "Air quality, Emotions, Map symbolisation, Route choice, Traffic, Visual variables",
author = "Stefan Fuest and Monika Sester and Griffin, {Amy L.}",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Grant [227198829/GRK1931]. ",
year = "2023",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.trip.2023.100829",
language = "English",
volume = "19",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nudging travellers to societally favourable routes

T2 - The impact of visual communication and emotional responses on decision making

AU - Fuest, Stefan

AU - Sester, Monika

AU - Griffin, Amy L.

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Grant [227198829/GRK1931].

PY - 2023/5

Y1 - 2023/5

N2 - As urbanisation increases, in many places, the transport system is suffering from problems that may affect large parts of the urban population, such as traffic congestion or increased air pollution. In both cases, a better distribution of traffic flows could contribute to establishing a more sustainable transport system, and to improve the situation from a societal point of view. In this paper, we use cartographic symbolisation for communicating favourability of route options for achieving a societal benefit. Since map symbols can evoke different emotional responses in the viewer, we investigate to which extent map symbols evoke positive and negative emotions and whether these influence route choice decision making. We created different cartographic visualisations and designed a user study that investigates the effectiveness and suitability of these different visualisation variants for influencing route choice based on two scenarios: traffic and air quality. Fourteen route maps were prepared using different map symbols to symbolise societally favourable and non-favourable route options. The results of this study show that map symbols can be used effectively for influencing route choice towards choosing the favourable route for the two tested scenarios. While visualisations that modify only lines were more effective in the traffic scenario, area symbol modifications were more effective for the air quality scenario. The symbolisation evoked a wide range of emotions in participants. While non-favourable routes mainly evoke negative emotions (particularly fear), favourable routes mainly evoked positive emotions (particularly contentment) or no emotions. The results further demonstrate that for some of the visualisation variants, emotions felt in response to the map visualisations contributed significantly to changing the route choice decisions in favour of the societally favourable route option. The findings of this research demonstrate the relationship between route choice behaviour and emotional responses elicited by map symbols.

AB - As urbanisation increases, in many places, the transport system is suffering from problems that may affect large parts of the urban population, such as traffic congestion or increased air pollution. In both cases, a better distribution of traffic flows could contribute to establishing a more sustainable transport system, and to improve the situation from a societal point of view. In this paper, we use cartographic symbolisation for communicating favourability of route options for achieving a societal benefit. Since map symbols can evoke different emotional responses in the viewer, we investigate to which extent map symbols evoke positive and negative emotions and whether these influence route choice decision making. We created different cartographic visualisations and designed a user study that investigates the effectiveness and suitability of these different visualisation variants for influencing route choice based on two scenarios: traffic and air quality. Fourteen route maps were prepared using different map symbols to symbolise societally favourable and non-favourable route options. The results of this study show that map symbols can be used effectively for influencing route choice towards choosing the favourable route for the two tested scenarios. While visualisations that modify only lines were more effective in the traffic scenario, area symbol modifications were more effective for the air quality scenario. The symbolisation evoked a wide range of emotions in participants. While non-favourable routes mainly evoke negative emotions (particularly fear), favourable routes mainly evoked positive emotions (particularly contentment) or no emotions. The results further demonstrate that for some of the visualisation variants, emotions felt in response to the map visualisations contributed significantly to changing the route choice decisions in favour of the societally favourable route option. The findings of this research demonstrate the relationship between route choice behaviour and emotional responses elicited by map symbols.

KW - Air quality

KW - Emotions

KW - Map symbolisation

KW - Route choice

KW - Traffic

KW - Visual variables

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153799617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100829

DO - 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100829

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85153799617

VL - 19

JO - Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives

JF - Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives

M1 - 100829

ER -

By the same author(s)