Negotiating with the tax auditor: Determinants of tax auditors' negotiation strategy choice and the effect on firms’ tax adjustments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Kay Blaufus
  • Daniela Lorenz
  • Michael Milde
  • Benjamin Peuthert
  • Alexander N. Schwäbe

External Research Organisations

  • Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg
  • Berlin Revenue Agency
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number101294
JournalAccounting, Organizations and Society
Volume97
Early online date6 Aug 2021
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Abstract

Using a survey of tax auditors, we investigate which factors determine tax auditors' choice of negotiation strategies during tax audits and analyze the effect of their chosen strategy on audit outcomes. The results show that, compared to a cooperative auditor negotiation strategy, a competitive auditor negotiation strategy is associated with significantly higher additional assessed taxes. However, the competitive strategy is associated with a lower probability that the negotiation partners will reach an agreement. These findings indicate an advantage of combining competitive and cooperative tactics (i.e., using a “mixed strategy”). We find that although this mixed strategy does not lead to significantly fewer additional taxes, it results in a higher agreement probability. Moreover, we show that the probability of using a mixed strategy increases with audit expertise and time pressure, whereas the use of a competitive (cooperative) strategy increases with the availability of higher authority (the quality of the taxpayer's financial accounting system) and a perceived competitive (cooperative or mixed) negotiation strategy of the tax advisor. In sum, our study provides new insights into how firms' tax burden is affected by negotiations between tax auditors and firms' tax advisors. The way these negotiations affect firms' tax burden is relevant for both tax policy and firms.

Keywords

    Negotiation strategies, Tax audit, Tax avoidance, Tax compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Negotiating with the tax auditor: Determinants of tax auditors' negotiation strategy choice and the effect on firms’ tax adjustments. / Blaufus, Kay; Lorenz, Daniela; Milde, Michael et al.
In: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 97, 101294, 02.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Blaufus K, Lorenz D, Milde M, Peuthert B, Schwäbe AN. Negotiating with the tax auditor: Determinants of tax auditors' negotiation strategy choice and the effect on firms’ tax adjustments. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2022 Feb;97:101294. Epub 2021 Aug 6. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2021.101294
Download
@article{b0b44ec8e564466db5d7506ca351d3da,
title = "Negotiating with the tax auditor: Determinants of tax auditors' negotiation strategy choice and the effect on firms{\textquoteright} tax adjustments",
abstract = "Using a survey of tax auditors, we investigate which factors determine tax auditors' choice of negotiation strategies during tax audits and analyze the effect of their chosen strategy on audit outcomes. The results show that, compared to a cooperative auditor negotiation strategy, a competitive auditor negotiation strategy is associated with significantly higher additional assessed taxes. However, the competitive strategy is associated with a lower probability that the negotiation partners will reach an agreement. These findings indicate an advantage of combining competitive and cooperative tactics (i.e., using a “mixed strategy”). We find that although this mixed strategy does not lead to significantly fewer additional taxes, it results in a higher agreement probability. Moreover, we show that the probability of using a mixed strategy increases with audit expertise and time pressure, whereas the use of a competitive (cooperative) strategy increases with the availability of higher authority (the quality of the taxpayer's financial accounting system) and a perceived competitive (cooperative or mixed) negotiation strategy of the tax advisor. In sum, our study provides new insights into how firms' tax burden is affected by negotiations between tax auditors and firms' tax advisors. The way these negotiations affect firms' tax burden is relevant for both tax policy and firms.",
keywords = "Negotiation strategies, Tax audit, Tax avoidance, Tax compliance",
author = "Kay Blaufus and Daniela Lorenz and Michael Milde and Benjamin Peuthert and Schw{\"a}be, {Alexander N.}",
note = "Funding Information: We thank Mark Peecher (editor), two anonymous reviewers, Jonathan Feinstein, Ulfert Gronewold, Jost Heckemeyer, Dirk Kiesewetter, Rainer Niemann, Renate Ortlieb, Deborah Schanz, Georg Schneider, and seminar participants at the Free University of Berlin, Leibniz University Hanover, LMU Munich, the University of Graz, the 2015 Tax Controversy Conference, the 2017 MaTax Conference, and the 2018 German Academic Association for Business Research (VHB) Annual Meeting for helpful comments and suggestions, and the Audit Department of the Senate Department of Finance in Berlin for the permission to conduct the survey among tax auditors.",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.aos.2021.101294",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
journal = "Accounting, Organizations and Society",
issn = "0361-3682",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Negotiating with the tax auditor

T2 - Determinants of tax auditors' negotiation strategy choice and the effect on firms’ tax adjustments

AU - Blaufus, Kay

AU - Lorenz, Daniela

AU - Milde, Michael

AU - Peuthert, Benjamin

AU - Schwäbe, Alexander N.

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Mark Peecher (editor), two anonymous reviewers, Jonathan Feinstein, Ulfert Gronewold, Jost Heckemeyer, Dirk Kiesewetter, Rainer Niemann, Renate Ortlieb, Deborah Schanz, Georg Schneider, and seminar participants at the Free University of Berlin, Leibniz University Hanover, LMU Munich, the University of Graz, the 2015 Tax Controversy Conference, the 2017 MaTax Conference, and the 2018 German Academic Association for Business Research (VHB) Annual Meeting for helpful comments and suggestions, and the Audit Department of the Senate Department of Finance in Berlin for the permission to conduct the survey among tax auditors.

PY - 2022/2

Y1 - 2022/2

N2 - Using a survey of tax auditors, we investigate which factors determine tax auditors' choice of negotiation strategies during tax audits and analyze the effect of their chosen strategy on audit outcomes. The results show that, compared to a cooperative auditor negotiation strategy, a competitive auditor negotiation strategy is associated with significantly higher additional assessed taxes. However, the competitive strategy is associated with a lower probability that the negotiation partners will reach an agreement. These findings indicate an advantage of combining competitive and cooperative tactics (i.e., using a “mixed strategy”). We find that although this mixed strategy does not lead to significantly fewer additional taxes, it results in a higher agreement probability. Moreover, we show that the probability of using a mixed strategy increases with audit expertise and time pressure, whereas the use of a competitive (cooperative) strategy increases with the availability of higher authority (the quality of the taxpayer's financial accounting system) and a perceived competitive (cooperative or mixed) negotiation strategy of the tax advisor. In sum, our study provides new insights into how firms' tax burden is affected by negotiations between tax auditors and firms' tax advisors. The way these negotiations affect firms' tax burden is relevant for both tax policy and firms.

AB - Using a survey of tax auditors, we investigate which factors determine tax auditors' choice of negotiation strategies during tax audits and analyze the effect of their chosen strategy on audit outcomes. The results show that, compared to a cooperative auditor negotiation strategy, a competitive auditor negotiation strategy is associated with significantly higher additional assessed taxes. However, the competitive strategy is associated with a lower probability that the negotiation partners will reach an agreement. These findings indicate an advantage of combining competitive and cooperative tactics (i.e., using a “mixed strategy”). We find that although this mixed strategy does not lead to significantly fewer additional taxes, it results in a higher agreement probability. Moreover, we show that the probability of using a mixed strategy increases with audit expertise and time pressure, whereas the use of a competitive (cooperative) strategy increases with the availability of higher authority (the quality of the taxpayer's financial accounting system) and a perceived competitive (cooperative or mixed) negotiation strategy of the tax advisor. In sum, our study provides new insights into how firms' tax burden is affected by negotiations between tax auditors and firms' tax advisors. The way these negotiations affect firms' tax burden is relevant for both tax policy and firms.

KW - Negotiation strategies

KW - Tax audit

KW - Tax avoidance

KW - Tax compliance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111969148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.aos.2021.101294

DO - 10.1016/j.aos.2021.101294

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85111969148

VL - 97

JO - Accounting, Organizations and Society

JF - Accounting, Organizations and Society

SN - 0361-3682

M1 - 101294

ER -