Keep them busy, keep them flowing? The effects of actively versus passively occupied wait time

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Sebastian Böddeker
  • Caroline Rothert-Schnell
  • Gianfranco Walsh
  • Markus Groth

External Research Organisations

  • UNSW Business School
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number115216
JournalJournal of business research
Volume189
Early online date26 Jan 2025
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Abstract

Having to wait for services is both inevitable and annoying. To mitigate the negative effects, customers can be engaged passively (e.g., watching TV) or actively (e.g., completing forms) while waiting. However, the effectiveness of each approach remains unclear. We investigate how different forms of wait time occupation (non-occupied versus occupied; passively versus actively occupied) affect customers’ intentions to return through their experience of flow and wait time satisfaction. We also investigate whether actual wait time moderates this relationship. A scenario-based (Study 1) and a simulated service (Study 2) experiment confirm the mediating roles of flow experience and wait time satisfaction, such that active, compared to passive, waiting increases the flow experience, enhancing wait time satisfaction and intentions to return. But longer actual wait times weaken the positive effect of the flow experience. Thus, our results suggest that actively occupying wait time effectively enhances service customers’ wait time perceptions.

Keywords

    Active, Flow experience, Health care, Occupied wait time, Passive

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Marketing

Cite this

Keep them busy, keep them flowing? The effects of actively versus passively occupied wait time. / Böddeker, Sebastian; Rothert-Schnell, Caroline; Walsh, Gianfranco et al.
In: Journal of business research, Vol. 189, 115216, 02.2025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Böddeker S, Rothert-Schnell C, Walsh G, Groth M. Keep them busy, keep them flowing? The effects of actively versus passively occupied wait time. Journal of business research. 2025 Feb;189:115216. Epub 2025 Jan 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115216
Böddeker, Sebastian ; Rothert-Schnell, Caroline ; Walsh, Gianfranco et al. / Keep them busy, keep them flowing? The effects of actively versus passively occupied wait time. In: Journal of business research. 2025 ; Vol. 189.
Download
@article{d11fa4037e5741879514abeb03b073b9,
title = "Keep them busy, keep them flowing? The effects of actively versus passively occupied wait time",
abstract = "Having to wait for services is both inevitable and annoying. To mitigate the negative effects, customers can be engaged passively (e.g., watching TV) or actively (e.g., completing forms) while waiting. However, the effectiveness of each approach remains unclear. We investigate how different forms of wait time occupation (non-occupied versus occupied; passively versus actively occupied) affect customers{\textquoteright} intentions to return through their experience of flow and wait time satisfaction. We also investigate whether actual wait time moderates this relationship. A scenario-based (Study 1) and a simulated service (Study 2) experiment confirm the mediating roles of flow experience and wait time satisfaction, such that active, compared to passive, waiting increases the flow experience, enhancing wait time satisfaction and intentions to return. But longer actual wait times weaken the positive effect of the flow experience. Thus, our results suggest that actively occupying wait time effectively enhances service customers{\textquoteright} wait time perceptions.",
keywords = "Active, Flow experience, Health care, Occupied wait time, Passive",
author = "Sebastian B{\"o}ddeker and Caroline Rothert-Schnell and Gianfranco Walsh and Markus Groth",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115216",
language = "English",
volume = "189",
journal = "Journal of business research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Keep them busy, keep them flowing? The effects of actively versus passively occupied wait time

AU - Böddeker, Sebastian

AU - Rothert-Schnell, Caroline

AU - Walsh, Gianfranco

AU - Groth, Markus

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025

PY - 2025/2

Y1 - 2025/2

N2 - Having to wait for services is both inevitable and annoying. To mitigate the negative effects, customers can be engaged passively (e.g., watching TV) or actively (e.g., completing forms) while waiting. However, the effectiveness of each approach remains unclear. We investigate how different forms of wait time occupation (non-occupied versus occupied; passively versus actively occupied) affect customers’ intentions to return through their experience of flow and wait time satisfaction. We also investigate whether actual wait time moderates this relationship. A scenario-based (Study 1) and a simulated service (Study 2) experiment confirm the mediating roles of flow experience and wait time satisfaction, such that active, compared to passive, waiting increases the flow experience, enhancing wait time satisfaction and intentions to return. But longer actual wait times weaken the positive effect of the flow experience. Thus, our results suggest that actively occupying wait time effectively enhances service customers’ wait time perceptions.

AB - Having to wait for services is both inevitable and annoying. To mitigate the negative effects, customers can be engaged passively (e.g., watching TV) or actively (e.g., completing forms) while waiting. However, the effectiveness of each approach remains unclear. We investigate how different forms of wait time occupation (non-occupied versus occupied; passively versus actively occupied) affect customers’ intentions to return through their experience of flow and wait time satisfaction. We also investigate whether actual wait time moderates this relationship. A scenario-based (Study 1) and a simulated service (Study 2) experiment confirm the mediating roles of flow experience and wait time satisfaction, such that active, compared to passive, waiting increases the flow experience, enhancing wait time satisfaction and intentions to return. But longer actual wait times weaken the positive effect of the flow experience. Thus, our results suggest that actively occupying wait time effectively enhances service customers’ wait time perceptions.

KW - Active

KW - Flow experience

KW - Health care

KW - Occupied wait time

KW - Passive

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215940556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115216

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115216

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85215940556

VL - 189

JO - Journal of business research

JF - Journal of business research

SN - 0148-2963

M1 - 115216

ER -