Innovating Web Probing: Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Timo Lenzner
  • Jan Karem Höhne
  • Konstantin Gavras

Research Organisations

External Research Organisations

  • GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
  • German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
  • Universität Pompeu Fabra (UPF)
  • Nesto Software GmbH
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1295-1317
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
Volume12
Issue number5
Early online date2 Aug 2024
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Abstract

Cognitive interviewing in the form of probing is key for developing methodologically sound survey questions. For a long time, probing was tied to the laboratory setting, making it difficult to achieve large sample sizes and creating a time-intensive undertaking for both researchers and participants. Web surveys paved the way for administering probing questions over the Internet in a time- and cost-efficient manner. In so-called web probing studies, respondents first answer a question and then they receive one or more open-ended questions about their response process, with requests for written answers. However, participants frequently provide very short or no answers at all to open-ended questions, in part because answering questions in writing is tedious. This is especially the case when the web survey is completed via a smartphone with a virtual on-screen keypad that shrinks the viewing space. In this study, we examine whether the problem of short and uninterpretable answers in web probing studies can be mitigated by asking respondents to complete the web survey on a smartphone and to record their answers via the built-in microphone. We conducted an experiment in a smartphone survey (N= 1,001), randomizing respondents to different communication modes (written or oral) for answering two comprehension probes about two questions on national identity and citizenship. The results indicate that probes with requests for oral answers produce four to five times more nonresponse than their written counterparts. However, oral answers contain about three times as many words, include about 0.3 more themes (first probing question only), and the proportion of clearly interpretable answers is about 6 percentage points higher (for the first probing question only). Nonetheless, both communication modes result in similar themes mentioned by respondents.

Keywords

    Cognitive pretesting, Experiment, Smartphone survey, Survey question design, Voice recording, Web probing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

Innovating Web Probing: Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey . / Lenzner, Timo; Höhne, Jan Karem; Gavras, Konstantin.
In: Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, Vol. 12, No. 5, 11.2024, p. 1295-1317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Lenzner, T, Höhne, JK & Gavras, K 2024, 'Innovating Web Probing: Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey ', Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1295-1317. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smae031
Lenzner, T., Höhne, J. K., & Gavras, K. (2024). Innovating Web Probing: Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey . Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 12(5), 1295-1317. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smae031
Lenzner T, Höhne JK, Gavras K. Innovating Web Probing: Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey . Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 2024 Nov;12(5):1295-1317. Epub 2024 Aug 2. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smae031
Lenzner, Timo ; Höhne, Jan Karem ; Gavras, Konstantin. / Innovating Web Probing : Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey . In: Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. 2024 ; Vol. 12, No. 5. pp. 1295-1317.
Download
@article{d3a84672fb104055af8384684b450a87,
title = "Innovating Web Probing: Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey ",
abstract = "Cognitive interviewing in the form of probing is key for developing methodologically sound survey questions. For a long time, probing was tied to the laboratory setting, making it difficult to achieve large sample sizes and creating a time-intensive undertaking for both researchers and participants. Web surveys paved the way for administering probing questions over the Internet in a time- and cost-efficient manner. In so-called web probing studies, respondents first answer a question and then they receive one or more open-ended questions about their response process, with requests for written answers. However, participants frequently provide very short or no answers at all to open-ended questions, in part because answering questions in writing is tedious. This is especially the case when the web survey is completed via a smartphone with a virtual on-screen keypad that shrinks the viewing space. In this study, we examine whether the problem of short and uninterpretable answers in web probing studies can be mitigated by asking respondents to complete the web survey on a smartphone and to record their answers via the built-in microphone. We conducted an experiment in a smartphone survey (N= 1,001), randomizing respondents to different communication modes (written or oral) for answering two comprehension probes about two questions on national identity and citizenship. The results indicate that probes with requests for oral answers produce four to five times more nonresponse than their written counterparts. However, oral answers contain about three times as many words, include about 0.3 more themes (first probing question only), and the proportion of clearly interpretable answers is about 6 percentage points higher (for the first probing question only). Nonetheless, both communication modes result in similar themes mentioned by respondents.",
keywords = "Cognitive pretesting, Experiment, Smartphone survey, Survey question design, Voice recording, Web probing",
author = "Timo Lenzner and H{\"o}hne, {Jan Karem} and Konstantin Gavras",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",
year = "2024",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1093/jssam/smae031",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1295--1317",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovating Web Probing

T2 - Comparing Written and Oral Answers to Open-Ended Probing Questions in a Smartphone Survey

AU - Lenzner, Timo

AU - Höhne, Jan Karem

AU - Gavras, Konstantin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

PY - 2024/11

Y1 - 2024/11

N2 - Cognitive interviewing in the form of probing is key for developing methodologically sound survey questions. For a long time, probing was tied to the laboratory setting, making it difficult to achieve large sample sizes and creating a time-intensive undertaking for both researchers and participants. Web surveys paved the way for administering probing questions over the Internet in a time- and cost-efficient manner. In so-called web probing studies, respondents first answer a question and then they receive one or more open-ended questions about their response process, with requests for written answers. However, participants frequently provide very short or no answers at all to open-ended questions, in part because answering questions in writing is tedious. This is especially the case when the web survey is completed via a smartphone with a virtual on-screen keypad that shrinks the viewing space. In this study, we examine whether the problem of short and uninterpretable answers in web probing studies can be mitigated by asking respondents to complete the web survey on a smartphone and to record their answers via the built-in microphone. We conducted an experiment in a smartphone survey (N= 1,001), randomizing respondents to different communication modes (written or oral) for answering two comprehension probes about two questions on national identity and citizenship. The results indicate that probes with requests for oral answers produce four to five times more nonresponse than their written counterparts. However, oral answers contain about three times as many words, include about 0.3 more themes (first probing question only), and the proportion of clearly interpretable answers is about 6 percentage points higher (for the first probing question only). Nonetheless, both communication modes result in similar themes mentioned by respondents.

AB - Cognitive interviewing in the form of probing is key for developing methodologically sound survey questions. For a long time, probing was tied to the laboratory setting, making it difficult to achieve large sample sizes and creating a time-intensive undertaking for both researchers and participants. Web surveys paved the way for administering probing questions over the Internet in a time- and cost-efficient manner. In so-called web probing studies, respondents first answer a question and then they receive one or more open-ended questions about their response process, with requests for written answers. However, participants frequently provide very short or no answers at all to open-ended questions, in part because answering questions in writing is tedious. This is especially the case when the web survey is completed via a smartphone with a virtual on-screen keypad that shrinks the viewing space. In this study, we examine whether the problem of short and uninterpretable answers in web probing studies can be mitigated by asking respondents to complete the web survey on a smartphone and to record their answers via the built-in microphone. We conducted an experiment in a smartphone survey (N= 1,001), randomizing respondents to different communication modes (written or oral) for answering two comprehension probes about two questions on national identity and citizenship. The results indicate that probes with requests for oral answers produce four to five times more nonresponse than their written counterparts. However, oral answers contain about three times as many words, include about 0.3 more themes (first probing question only), and the proportion of clearly interpretable answers is about 6 percentage points higher (for the first probing question only). Nonetheless, both communication modes result in similar themes mentioned by respondents.

KW - Cognitive pretesting

KW - Experiment

KW - Smartphone survey

KW - Survey question design

KW - Voice recording

KW - Web probing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209259012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jssam/smae031

DO - 10.1093/jssam/smae031

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85209259012

VL - 12

SP - 1295

EP - 1317

JO - Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology

JF - Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology

SN - 2325-0984

IS - 5

ER -