How much priority bonus should be given to registered organ donors? An experimental analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Authors

  • Annika Herr
  • Hans Theo Normann

External Research Organisations

  • University Hospital Düsseldorf
  • Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
View graph of relations

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-378
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume158
Early online date23 Dec 2018
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Giving registered organ donors priority on organ waiting list can substantially increase the number of donors and save lifes. Evidence for these effects comes from recent experiments that implemented such priority rules in abstract laboratory environments. In these experiments, participants who registered as organ donors were fully prioritized over those who did not. In the field, however, registering as a donor is only one factor affecting the recipient's score. In this paper, we provide a comparative statics analysis of the priority treatment by varying the number of bonus periods that a registered person can skip on the waiting list. We find that behavior is monotonic: giving more priority to registered donors leads to higher registration rates. Our results also indicate that a medium sized bonus improves registration rates as much as absolute priority (used in the previous literature).

Keywords

    Laboratory experiment, Organ donation, Priority rule, Waiting list

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cite this

How much priority bonus should be given to registered organ donors? An experimental analysis. / Herr, Annika; Normann, Hans Theo.
In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 158, 02.2019, p. 367-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer review

Herr A, Normann HT. How much priority bonus should be given to registered organ donors? An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2019 Feb;158:367-378. Epub 2018 Dec 23. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.006
Download
@article{91787162d6d04ba9bc84fe22538758cb,
title = "How much priority bonus should be given to registered organ donors? An experimental analysis",
abstract = "Giving registered organ donors priority on organ waiting list can substantially increase the number of donors and save lifes. Evidence for these effects comes from recent experiments that implemented such priority rules in abstract laboratory environments. In these experiments, participants who registered as organ donors were fully prioritized over those who did not. In the field, however, registering as a donor is only one factor affecting the recipient's score. In this paper, we provide a comparative statics analysis of the priority treatment by varying the number of bonus periods that a registered person can skip on the waiting list. We find that behavior is monotonic: giving more priority to registered donors leads to higher registration rates. Our results also indicate that a medium sized bonus improves registration rates as much as absolute priority (used in the previous literature).",
keywords = "Laboratory experiment, Organ donation, Priority rule, Waiting list",
author = "Annika Herr and Normann, {Hans Theo}",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.006",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "367--378",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - How much priority bonus should be given to registered organ donors? An experimental analysis

AU - Herr, Annika

AU - Normann, Hans Theo

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Giving registered organ donors priority on organ waiting list can substantially increase the number of donors and save lifes. Evidence for these effects comes from recent experiments that implemented such priority rules in abstract laboratory environments. In these experiments, participants who registered as organ donors were fully prioritized over those who did not. In the field, however, registering as a donor is only one factor affecting the recipient's score. In this paper, we provide a comparative statics analysis of the priority treatment by varying the number of bonus periods that a registered person can skip on the waiting list. We find that behavior is monotonic: giving more priority to registered donors leads to higher registration rates. Our results also indicate that a medium sized bonus improves registration rates as much as absolute priority (used in the previous literature).

AB - Giving registered organ donors priority on organ waiting list can substantially increase the number of donors and save lifes. Evidence for these effects comes from recent experiments that implemented such priority rules in abstract laboratory environments. In these experiments, participants who registered as organ donors were fully prioritized over those who did not. In the field, however, registering as a donor is only one factor affecting the recipient's score. In this paper, we provide a comparative statics analysis of the priority treatment by varying the number of bonus periods that a registered person can skip on the waiting list. We find that behavior is monotonic: giving more priority to registered donors leads to higher registration rates. Our results also indicate that a medium sized bonus improves registration rates as much as absolute priority (used in the previous literature).

KW - Laboratory experiment

KW - Organ donation

KW - Priority rule

KW - Waiting list

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058815890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058815890

VL - 158

SP - 367

EP - 378

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

SN - 0167-2681

ER -